Questions tagged [set-theory]
forcing, large cardinals, descriptive set theory, infinite combinatorics, cardinal characteristics, forcing axioms, ultrapowers, measures, reflection, pcf theory, models of set theory, axioms of set theory, independence, axiom of choice, continuum hypothesis, determinacy, Borel equivalence relations, Boolean-valued models, embeddings, orders, relations, transfinite recursion, set theory as a foundation of mathematics, the philosophy of set theory.
1,112 questions
28
votes
0
answers
827
views
Can one divide by the cardinal of an amorphous set?
This question arose in a discussion with Peter Doyle.
It is provable in ZF that one can divide by any positive finite cardinal $k$: if $X \times \{1,\ldots,k\} \simeq Y \times \{1,\ldots,k\}$ then $X \...
28
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Construction of nonmeasurable sets
I have a history question for which I've had trouble finding a good answer.
The common story about nonmeasurable sets is that Vitali showed that one existed using the Axiom of Choice, and Lebesgue et ...
27
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Using consistency to create new axioms in set theory
As everybody knows, the ZFC axioms may serve as a foundation for (almost)
all of contemporary mathematics, and it is also well-known that several results
are "indecidable" in ZFC, which means that ...
27
votes
1
answer
932
views
A cardinal inequality for finiteness
Nearly ten years ago, I explained in a blog post that, assuming only ZF, a cardinal number $\mathfrak{n}$ is finite if and only if it satisfies this monstrous inequality:
$$2^{2^{2^{2^{\mathfrak{n}}}}}...
27
votes
3
answers
4k
views
Interactions between (set theory, model theory) and (algebraic geometry, algebraic number theory ,...)
Set theory and model theory have many applications outside of logic, in particular in algebra, topology, analysis, ...
On the other hand model theory, in particular after Hrushovski, found many ...
27
votes
5
answers
4k
views
What is induction up to $\varepsilon_0$?
This is a question asked out of curiosity, and because I can't understand the Wikipedia page.
I have often been told that PA cannot prove the validity of induction up to $\varepsilon_0$, which has ...
27
votes
4
answers
3k
views
What "metatheory" did early set theory/logic researchers use to prove semantic results?
Things like the first-order completeness theorem and the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem are considered foundational in mathematical logic.
The modern approach seems to be, usually, to interpret a "model" ...
27
votes
6
answers
5k
views
Has any open/difficult problem in ordinary mathematics been solved only/mostly by appeal to set theory?
We know that many (if not all) mathematical notions can be reduced to the talk of sets and set-membership. But it nevertheless sounds like a grueling task (if at all possible) to actually get advanced ...
27
votes
4
answers
10k
views
Finite axiom of choice: how do you prove it from just ZF?
The axiom of choice asserts the existence of a choice function for any family of sets F. Suppose, however, that F is finite, or even that F just has one set. Then how do we prove the existence of a ...
26
votes
2
answers
1k
views
When does the choice of the generic matter?
It is a somewhat curious phenomenon that, in forcing arguments, one usually doesn't care about any particular properties of the generic filter being used (this isn't strictly true; there are cases ...
26
votes
9
answers
8k
views
Why are proofs so valuable, although we do not know that our axiom system is consistent? [closed]
As a person who has been spending significant time to learn mathematics, I have to admit that I sometimes find the fact uncovered by Godel very upsetting: we never can know that our axiom system is ...
26
votes
1
answer
3k
views
How far wrong could the Continuum Hypothesis be?
I hear it's consistent with ZFC to have
$$ 2^{\aleph_0} = \aleph_n $$
for any $n = 1, 2, 3, \dots $. How much worse can it get?
More precisely: are there models of ZFC with $2^{\aleph_0} \gt \aleph_n$...
26
votes
4
answers
7k
views
What would be some major consequences of the inconsistency of ZFC?
Update (21st April, 2019). Removed the reference / initial trigger behind my question (please see comment thread below for the reasons). Am retaining, of course, the actual question, noted both in the ...
26
votes
4
answers
1k
views
Is Monsky's theorem dependent on the axiom of choice?
The extension of the 2-adic valuation to the reals used in the usual proof clearly uses AC. But is this really necessary? After all, given an equidissection in $n$ triangles, it is finite, so it ...
26
votes
4
answers
2k
views
Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero set of the same cardinality? Does it contain a meager set of the same cardinality?
This question arises from an issue in my post on Ashutosh's excellent question on Restrictions of the null/meager ideal.
Question 1. Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero subset
of the same ...
25
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Axiom of choice: ultrafilter vs. Vitali set
It is well known that from a free (non-principal) ultrafilter on $\omega$ one can define a non-measurable set of reals. The older example of a non-measurable set is the Vitali set,
a set of ...
25
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Writing a function on $\mathbb{R}$ as a sum of two injections
Let $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function. It is well-known that, using transfinite recursion with a well-ordering of $\mathbb{R}$, one can construct two injective functions $g,h: \...
25
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Detecting uncountable cardinals in $(\mathbb{R};+,\times,\mathbb{N})$
For a structure $\mathcal{X}=(X;...)$, say that a cardinal $\kappa$ is $\mathcal{X}$-detectable iff there is some sentence $\varphi$ in the language of $\mathcal{X}$ together with a fresh unary ...
24
votes
8
answers
6k
views
Choice vs. countable choice
This question arose after reading the answers (and the comments to the answers) to Why worry about the axiom of choice?.
First things first. In my intuitive conception of the hierarchy of sets, the ...
24
votes
2
answers
5k
views
Recent claim that inaccessibles are inconsistent with ZF
Here it is mentioned that someone claims to have proven that there are no weakly inaccessibles in ZF.
Question 1: What reasons are there to believe that weakly inaccessibles exist?
Question(s) 2: ...
24
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Forcing and Family Contentions: Who wins the disputes?
The famous game-theoretic couple, Alice & Bob, live in the set-theoretic universe, $V$, a model of $ZFC$. Just like many other couples they sometimes argue over a statement, $\sigma$, expressible ...
24
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Is it possible to construct an infinite subset of $\Bbb R$ that is not order isomorphic to any proper subset of itself?
Is it possible to construct an infinite subset of $\Bbb R$ that is not order isomorphic to any proper subset of itself?
23
votes
1
answer
3k
views
What's the difference between ZFC+Grothendieck, ZFC+inaccessible cardinals and Tarski-Grothendieck set theory?
Say that "U" is the axiom that "For each set x, there exists a Grothendieck universe U such that x $\in$ U", where Grothendieck universes are defined in the usual way (or, if that'...
23
votes
4
answers
2k
views
Anti-large cardinal principles
I'm interested in axioms that prevent the existence of large cardinals. More precisely:
(Informal definition) $\Phi$ is an anti-large-cardinal axiom iff $V \models \Phi \Rightarrow V \not \models \...
23
votes
2
answers
670
views
Order type of the smallest set containing the identity function and closed under exponentiation
Let $E$ be the smallest set of functions $\mathbb{N}^+\to\mathbb{N}^+$ containing the identity function $n \mapsto n$ and closed under exponentiation $(f,g) \mapsto \left(n \mapsto f(n)^{g(n)}\right)$...
23
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Statements in differential geometry independent from ZFC
It is well known that some problems in functional analysis and in general topology are independent from ZFC: to name a few, Kaplansky's conjecture, the existence of outer automorphisms of the Calkin ...
23
votes
4
answers
20k
views
Is there a natural bijection from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\mathbb{Q}$?
In a conversation where it came up that the Pythagoreans probably found an enumeration of the rational numbers I erroneously remarked that Georg Cantor found a natural bijection from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\...
23
votes
3
answers
2k
views
An ultrafilter is a set of subsets containing exactly one element of each finite partition: reference request
There are probably dozens of ways of defining "ultrafilter". The definition I've seen most often involves first defining "filter", then declaring an ultrafilter to be a maximal filter.
But there's ...
23
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Is it consistent with ZF that $V\to V^{\ast \ast}$ is always surjective?
In a comment to a recent question, Jeremy Rickard asked whether it is consistent with ZF that the map $V \to V^{**}$ from a vector space to its double dual is always surjective. We know that "...
22
votes
4
answers
4k
views
Are proper classes objects?
Many of us presume that mathematics studies objects. In agreement with this, set theorists often say that they study the well founded hereditarily extensional objects generated ex nihilo by the "...
22
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Nice algebraic statements independent from ZF + V=L (constructibility)
Background and motivation
I've always been fascinated about algebraic statements independent from ZFC set theory. One such fascinating example comes from considering $\rm{Ext}^1_\mathbb{Z}(A,\mathbb{Z}...
22
votes
4
answers
4k
views
How much of the axiom of choice do you need in mathematics?
Say we have DC-λ where λ is some inaccessible cardinal. Is that enough to develop all of ordinary mathematics? If not, is there a strengthening that is but that nevertheless does not assume full ...
22
votes
2
answers
1k
views
How "much" does (Grigorieff) forcing destroy an ultrafilter?
Introduction. I recently revisited Shelah's model without P-points and I was wondering how "badly" Grigorieff forcing destroys ultrafilters, i.e., what kind of properties can survive the destruction ...
22
votes
1
answer
686
views
Is a model of set theory determined by the Cohen reals over it?
This question concerns the amount of information about a model $M$ that is contained in the collection of all reals Cohen over $M$.
Specifically, let $M$ and $N$ be countable transitive models of ZFC ...
22
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Half Cantor-Bernstein without choice
I had a discussion with one of my teachers the other day, which boiled to the following question:
Assume ZF. Let $A,B$ be sets such that there exist $f\colon A\to B$ which is injective and $g\colon A\...
22
votes
1
answer
938
views
How badly can the GCH fail globally?
It's known that we can have global failures of GCH---for example, where $\forall \lambda(2^\lambda = \lambda^{++})$---given suitable large cardinal axioms.
My question is whether we can have global ...
22
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Where are Georg Cantor's Original Manuscripts?
Georg Cantor is famous for introducing transfinite numbers and set theory.
A main part of his mathematical point of view about this new type of "numbers" and this new "realm of mathematics" cannot be ...
21
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Philosophical arguments in defense (or against) large cardinals
The question is essentially what is asked in the title. I split it into two parts
(A) (Arguments supporting the existence of large cardinals) What are the main philosophical arguments in defense of ...
21
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Surmounting set-theoretical difficulties in algebraic geometry
The category $\text{AffSch}_S$ of affine schemes over some base affine scheme $S$ is not essentially small. This lends itself to certain set-theoretical difficulties when working with a category $Sh(\...
21
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Are there as many real-closed fields of a given cardinality as I think there are?
Let $\kappa$ be an infinite cardinal. Then there exists at least one real-closed field of cardinality $\kappa$ (e.g. Lowenheim-Skolem; or, start with a function field over $\mathbb{Q}$ in $\kappa$ ...
21
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Antirandom reals
This is a crossposting of https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1446602/anti-random-reals, which has not gotten any answers; after thinking about the problem, I've become more convinced that it ...
21
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Logical endofunctors of Set?
What set-theoretic assumptions are necessary and sufficient to ensure the existence of a nontrivial (i.e. not isomorphic to the identity) endofunctor of the category Set which is logical (i.e. ...
21
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Is Dependent Choice all we really need?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_dependent_choice
Is DC sufficient for the understanding of objects that are countable in some suitable sense?
For example, is DC sufficient for the full ...
20
votes
2
answers
1k
views
An order type $\tau$ equal to its power $\tau^n, n>2$
(This is a re-post of my old unanswered question from Math.SE)
For purposes of this question, let's concern ourselves only with linear (but not necessarily well-founded) order types.
Recall that:
$...
20
votes
4
answers
3k
views
A New Continuum Hypothesis (Revised Version)
Define $N_n$ as $n$ th natural number: $N_0=0, N_1=1, N_2=2, ...$.
What happens after exponentiation?
We have the following equation: $2^{N_n}=N_{2^{n}}$.
(Which says: For all finite cardinal $n$ ...
20
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Cantor's argument revisited
This was inspired by this recent question.
In my answer there, I pointed out that, given $F:{\mathcal P}(X)\to X$, an argument dating back to Zermelo allows us to define a pair $(A,B)$ of distinct ...
20
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Axiom of choice and bases of vector spaces over a fixed field
Let $k$ be a field. In 1984 Andreas Blass proved that the axiom "for every extension $K|k$, every vector space over $K$ has a basis" implies the axiom of choice. He also raised the question
Does ...
20
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Does $V = \textit{Ultimate }L$ imply GCH?
In his Midrasha Mathematicae lectures ("In Search of Ultimate $L$", BSL 23 [2017]: 1–109), Woodin notes that $V = \textit{Ultimate }L$ implies $\textrm{CH}$ (Theorem 7.26, p.103). Is it known whether $...
20
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Why does inner model theory need so much descriptive set theory (and vice versa)?
I am curious about how much descriptive set theory is involved in inner model theory.
For instance Shoenfield's absoluteness result is based on the construction of the Shoenfield tree which ...
20
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Axiom of Choice versus V=L in opposition to large cardinals
Consider the following two observations:
The axiom $V=L$ is incompatible with large cardinal axioms that are somehow "too large", like measurable cardinals.
The axiom of Choice is incompatible with ...