Skip to main content

Questions tagged [set-theory]

forcing, large cardinals, descriptive set theory, infinite combinatorics, cardinal characteristics, forcing axioms, ultrapowers, measures, reflection, pcf theory, models of set theory, axioms of set theory, independence, axiom of choice, continuum hypothesis, determinacy, Borel equivalence relations, Boolean-valued models, embeddings, orders, relations, transfinite recursion, set theory as a foundation of mathematics, the philosophy of set theory.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
28 votes
0 answers
827 views

Can one divide by the cardinal of an amorphous set?

This question arose in a discussion with Peter Doyle. It is provable in ZF that one can divide by any positive finite cardinal $k$: if $X \times \{1,\ldots,k\} \simeq Y \times \{1,\ldots,k\}$ then $X \...
François G. Dorais's user avatar
28 votes
3 answers
3k views

Construction of nonmeasurable sets

I have a history question for which I've had trouble finding a good answer. The common story about nonmeasurable sets is that Vitali showed that one existed using the Axiom of Choice, and Lebesgue et ...
Monroe Eskew's user avatar
  • 18.6k
27 votes
3 answers
2k views

Using consistency to create new axioms in set theory

As everybody knows, the ZFC axioms may serve as a foundation for (almost) all of contemporary mathematics, and it is also well-known that several results are "indecidable" in ZFC, which means that ...
Ewan Delanoy's user avatar
  • 3,595
27 votes
1 answer
932 views

A cardinal inequality for finiteness

Nearly ten years ago, I explained in a blog post that, assuming only ZF, a cardinal number $\mathfrak{n}$ is finite if and only if it satisfies this monstrous inequality: $$2^{2^{2^{2^{\mathfrak{n}}}}}...
François G. Dorais's user avatar
27 votes
3 answers
4k views

Interactions between (set theory, model theory) and (algebraic geometry, algebraic number theory ,...)

Set theory and model theory have many applications outside of logic, in particular in algebra, topology, analysis, ... On the other hand model theory, in particular after Hrushovski, found many ...
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
27 votes
5 answers
4k views

What is induction up to $\varepsilon_0$?

This is a question asked out of curiosity, and because I can't understand the Wikipedia page. I have often been told that PA cannot prove the validity of induction up to $\varepsilon_0$, which has ...
David E Speyer's user avatar
27 votes
4 answers
3k views

What "metatheory" did early set theory/logic researchers use to prove semantic results?

Things like the first-order completeness theorem and the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem are considered foundational in mathematical logic. The modern approach seems to be, usually, to interpret a "model" ...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
27 votes
6 answers
5k views

Has any open/difficult problem in ordinary mathematics been solved only/mostly by appeal to set theory?

We know that many (if not all) mathematical notions can be reduced to the talk of sets and set-membership. But it nevertheless sounds like a grueling task (if at all possible) to actually get advanced ...
27 votes
4 answers
10k views

Finite axiom of choice: how do you prove it from just ZF?

The axiom of choice asserts the existence of a choice function for any family of sets F. Suppose, however, that F is finite, or even that F just has one set. Then how do we prove the existence of a ...
user7758's user avatar
  • 287
26 votes
2 answers
1k views

When does the choice of the generic matter?

It is a somewhat curious phenomenon that, in forcing arguments, one usually doesn't care about any particular properties of the generic filter being used (this isn't strictly true; there are cases ...
Miha Habič's user avatar
  • 2,389
26 votes
9 answers
8k views

Why are proofs so valuable, although we do not know that our axiom system is consistent? [closed]

As a person who has been spending significant time to learn mathematics, I have to admit that I sometimes find the fact uncovered by Godel very upsetting: we never can know that our axiom system is ...
26 votes
1 answer
3k views

How far wrong could the Continuum Hypothesis be?

I hear it's consistent with ZFC to have $$ 2^{\aleph_0} = \aleph_n $$ for any $n = 1, 2, 3, \dots $. How much worse can it get? More precisely: are there models of ZFC with $2^{\aleph_0} \gt \aleph_n$...
John Baez's user avatar
  • 22.3k
26 votes
4 answers
7k views

What would be some major consequences of the inconsistency of ZFC?

Update (21st April, 2019). Removed the reference / initial trigger behind my question (please see comment thread below for the reasons). Am retaining, of course, the actual question, noted both in the ...
Suvrit's user avatar
  • 28.6k
26 votes
4 answers
1k views

Is Monsky's theorem dependent on the axiom of choice?

The extension of the 2-adic valuation to the reals used in the usual proof clearly uses AC. But is this really necessary? After all, given an equidissection in $n$ triangles, it is finite, so it ...
Feldmann Denis's user avatar
26 votes
4 answers
2k views

Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero set of the same cardinality? Does it contain a meager set of the same cardinality?

This question arises from an issue in my post on Ashutosh's excellent question on Restrictions of the null/meager ideal. Question 1. Does every set of reals contain a measure-zero subset of the same ...
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
25 votes
2 answers
2k views

Axiom of choice: ultrafilter vs. Vitali set

It is well known that from a free (non-principal) ultrafilter on $\omega$ one can define a non-measurable set of reals. The older example of a non-measurable set is the Vitali set, a set of ...
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
25 votes
2 answers
2k views

Writing a function on $\mathbb{R}$ as a sum of two injections

Let $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function. It is well-known that, using transfinite recursion with a well-ordering of $\mathbb{R}$, one can construct two injective functions $g,h: \...
Burak's user avatar
  • 4,265
25 votes
2 answers
1k views

Detecting uncountable cardinals in $(\mathbb{R};+,\times,\mathbb{N})$

For a structure $\mathcal{X}=(X;...)$, say that a cardinal $\kappa$ is $\mathcal{X}$-detectable iff there is some sentence $\varphi$ in the language of $\mathcal{X}$ together with a fresh unary ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
24 votes
8 answers
6k views

Choice vs. countable choice

This question arose after reading the answers (and the comments to the answers) to Why worry about the axiom of choice?. First things first. In my intuitive conception of the hierarchy of sets, the ...
G. Rodrigues's user avatar
  • 1,848
24 votes
2 answers
5k views

Recent claim that inaccessibles are inconsistent with ZF

Here it is mentioned that someone claims to have proven that there are no weakly inaccessibles in ZF. Question 1: What reasons are there to believe that weakly inaccessibles exist? Question(s) 2: ...
Quinn Culver's user avatar
24 votes
1 answer
1k views

Forcing and Family Contentions: Who wins the disputes?

The famous game-theoretic couple, Alice & Bob, live in the set-theoretic universe, $V$, a model of $ZFC$. Just like many other couples they sometimes argue over a statement, $\sigma$, expressible ...
Morteza Azad's user avatar
24 votes
3 answers
2k views

Is it possible to construct an infinite subset of $\Bbb R$ that is not order isomorphic to any proper subset of itself?

Is it possible to construct an infinite subset of $\Bbb R$ that is not order isomorphic to any proper subset of itself?
Marty Colos's user avatar
23 votes
1 answer
3k views

What's the difference between ZFC+Grothendieck, ZFC+inaccessible cardinals and Tarski-Grothendieck set theory?

Say that "U" is the axiom that "For each set x, there exists a Grothendieck universe U such that x $\in$ U", where Grothendieck universes are defined in the usual way (or, if that'...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
23 votes
4 answers
2k views

Anti-large cardinal principles

I'm interested in axioms that prevent the existence of large cardinals. More precisely: (Informal definition) $\Phi$ is an anti-large-cardinal axiom iff $V \models \Phi \Rightarrow V \not \models \...
Neil Barton's user avatar
23 votes
2 answers
670 views

Order type of the smallest set containing the identity function and closed under exponentiation

Let $E$ be the smallest set of functions $\mathbb{N}^+\to\mathbb{N}^+$ containing the identity function $n \mapsto n$ and closed under exponentiation $(f,g) \mapsto \left(n \mapsto f(n)^{g(n)}\right)$...
TauMu's user avatar
  • 872
23 votes
2 answers
1k views

Statements in differential geometry independent from ZFC

It is well known that some problems in functional analysis and in general topology are independent from ZFC: to name a few, Kaplansky's conjecture, the existence of outer automorphisms of the Calkin ...
23 votes
4 answers
20k views

Is there a natural bijection from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\mathbb{Q}$?

In a conversation where it came up that the Pythagoreans probably found an enumeration of the rational numbers I erroneously remarked that Georg Cantor found a natural bijection from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
23 votes
3 answers
2k views

An ultrafilter is a set of subsets containing exactly one element of each finite partition: reference request

There are probably dozens of ways of defining "ultrafilter". The definition I've seen most often involves first defining "filter", then declaring an ultrafilter to be a maximal filter. But there's ...
Tom Leinster's user avatar
  • 27.7k
23 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is it consistent with ZF that $V\to V^{\ast \ast}$ is always surjective?

In a comment to a recent question, Jeremy Rickard asked whether it is consistent with ZF that the map $V \to V^{**}$ from a vector space to its double dual is always surjective. We know that "...
Timothy Chow's user avatar
  • 82.7k
22 votes
4 answers
4k views

Are proper classes objects?

Many of us presume that mathematics studies objects. In agreement with this, set theorists often say that they study the well founded hereditarily extensional objects generated ex nihilo by the "...
Cole Leahy's user avatar
  • 1,081
22 votes
3 answers
2k views

Nice algebraic statements independent from ZF + V=L (constructibility)

Background and motivation I've always been fascinated about algebraic statements independent from ZFC set theory. One such fascinating example comes from considering $\rm{Ext}^1_\mathbb{Z}(A,\mathbb{Z}...
user avatar
22 votes
4 answers
4k views

How much of the axiom of choice do you need in mathematics?

Say we have DC-λ where λ is some inaccessible cardinal. Is that enough to develop all of ordinary mathematics? If not, is there a strengthening that is but that nevertheless does not assume full ...
Someone211's user avatar
22 votes
2 answers
1k views

How "much" does (Grigorieff) forcing destroy an ultrafilter?

Introduction. I recently revisited Shelah's model without P-points and I was wondering how "badly" Grigorieff forcing destroys ultrafilters, i.e., what kind of properties can survive the destruction ...
22 votes
1 answer
686 views

Is a model of set theory determined by the Cohen reals over it?

This question concerns the amount of information about a model $M$ that is contained in the collection of all reals Cohen over $M$. Specifically, let $M$ and $N$ be countable transitive models of ZFC ...
Miha Habič's user avatar
  • 2,389
22 votes
3 answers
3k views

Half Cantor-Bernstein without choice

I had a discussion with one of my teachers the other day, which boiled to the following question: Assume ZF. Let $A,B$ be sets such that there exist $f\colon A\to B$ which is injective and $g\colon A\...
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
22 votes
1 answer
938 views

How badly can the GCH fail globally?

It's known that we can have global failures of GCH---for example, where $\forall \lambda(2^\lambda = \lambda^{++})$---given suitable large cardinal axioms. My question is whether we can have global ...
Sam Roberts's user avatar
  • 1,198
22 votes
2 answers
3k views

Where are Georg Cantor's Original Manuscripts?

Georg Cantor is famous for introducing transfinite numbers and set theory. A main part of his mathematical point of view about this new type of "numbers" and this new "realm of mathematics" cannot be ...
user45421's user avatar
  • 229
21 votes
2 answers
2k views

Philosophical arguments in defense (or against) large cardinals

The question is essentially what is asked in the title. I split it into two parts (A) (Arguments supporting the existence of large cardinals) What are the main philosophical arguments in defense of ...
21 votes
1 answer
2k views

Surmounting set-theoretical difficulties in algebraic geometry

The category $\text{AffSch}_S$ of affine schemes over some base affine scheme $S$ is not essentially small. This lends itself to certain set-theoretical difficulties when working with a category $Sh(\...
Exit path's user avatar
  • 3,019
21 votes
3 answers
2k views

Are there as many real-closed fields of a given cardinality as I think there are?

Let $\kappa$ be an infinite cardinal. Then there exists at least one real-closed field of cardinality $\kappa$ (e.g. Lowenheim-Skolem; or, start with a function field over $\mathbb{Q}$ in $\kappa$ ...
Pete L. Clark's user avatar
21 votes
2 answers
1k views

Antirandom reals

This is a crossposting of https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1446602/anti-random-reals, which has not gotten any answers; after thinking about the problem, I've become more convinced that it ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
21 votes
1 answer
1k views

Logical endofunctors of Set?

What set-theoretic assumptions are necessary and sufficient to ensure the existence of a nontrivial (i.e. not isomorphic to the identity) endofunctor of the category Set which is logical (i.e. ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.8k
21 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is Dependent Choice all we really need?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_dependent_choice Is DC sufficient for the understanding of objects that are countable in some suitable sense? For example, is DC sufficient for the full ...
Andre's user avatar
  • 1,199
20 votes
2 answers
1k views

An order type $\tau$ equal to its power $\tau^n, n>2$

(This is a re-post of my old unanswered question from Math.SE) For purposes of this question, let's concern ourselves only with linear (but not necessarily well-founded) order types. Recall that: $...
Vladimir Reshetnikov's user avatar
20 votes
4 answers
3k views

A New Continuum Hypothesis (Revised Version)

Define $N_n$ as $n$ th natural number: $N_0=0, N_1=1, N_2=2, ...$. What happens after exponentiation? We have the following equation: $2^{N_n}=N_{2^{n}}$. (Which says: For all finite cardinal $n$ ...
user avatar
20 votes
2 answers
2k views

Cantor's argument revisited

This was inspired by this recent question. In my answer there, I pointed out that, given $F:{\mathcal P}(X)\to X$, an argument dating back to Zermelo allows us to define a pair $(A,B)$ of distinct ...
Andrés E. Caicedo's user avatar
20 votes
1 answer
2k views

Axiom of choice and bases of vector spaces over a fixed field

Let $k$ be a field. In 1984 Andreas Blass proved that the axiom "for every extension $K|k$, every vector space over $K$ has a basis" implies the axiom of choice. He also raised the question Does ...
Ralph's user avatar
  • 16.2k
20 votes
2 answers
2k views

Does $V = \textit{Ultimate }L$ imply GCH?

In his Midrasha Mathematicae lectures ("In Search of Ultimate $L$", BSL 23 [2017]: 1–109), Woodin notes that $V = \textit{Ultimate }L$ implies $\textrm{CH}$ (Theorem 7.26, p.103). Is it known whether $...
Beau Madison Mount's user avatar
20 votes
2 answers
2k views

Why does inner model theory need so much descriptive set theory (and vice versa)?

I am curious about how much descriptive set theory is involved in inner model theory. For instance Shoenfield's absoluteness result is based on the construction of the Shoenfield tree which ...
Rachid Atmai's user avatar
  • 3,804
20 votes
1 answer
1k views

Axiom of Choice versus V=L in opposition to large cardinals

Consider the following two observations: The axiom $V=L$ is incompatible with large cardinal axioms that are somehow "too large", like measurable cardinals. The axiom of Choice is incompatible with ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k

1
7 8
9
10 11
23