Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
4 votes
0 answers
488 views

Deligne's letter to Soulé from 1985

There is a famous letter of Deligne to C. Soulé in which, apparently, Deligne first formulated the conjecture on the existence of an abelian category of mixed motives, extending Grothendieck's pure ...
6 votes
0 answers
439 views

Cohomology theories for algebraic varieties over number fields

There is a standard line which is repeated by anyone writing/talking about motives and cohomology of algebraic varieties over number fields: namely, there are many such cohomologies and then the ...
31 votes
2 answers
3k views

On Grothendieck's idea on his Standard Conjecture B

Let me recall the Standard Conjecture B (see [1,2] below): The $\Lambda$-operation of Hodge theory is algebraic. It more or less says that the partial inverse to “cupping with the class of a ...
5 votes
0 answers
176 views

Can a Chow motif be isomorphic to its own direct summand?

Let $M$ be a $R$-linear Chow motif over a field $k$ that is perfect but not necessarily algebraically closed. Can one prove that $M$ is not a direct summand of itself (that is, $M\not\cong M\bigoplus ...
3 votes
0 answers
331 views

Motives (and examples) of projective bundles over projective spaces

If a projective bundle $Y$ over a variety $X$ is obtained from a vector bundle $E/X$ then the cohomology and the motif of $Y$ is known to be closely related to that of $X$. Now, what can one say in ...
5 votes
1 answer
300 views

A question on motivic zeta-function

It's well-known that over $\mathbb F_q$ every smooth projective conic $C$ is isomorphic to a projective line. So the formula for the motivic zeta-function $Z_{mot}(C)$ is evident since $S^n\mathbb P^1 ...
7 votes
1 answer
474 views

Motivic $\mathbf{Z}(1)$

I know that the Bloch higher Chow complex, $\mathbf{Z}(i)_{\mathcal{M}}$, on a smooth scheme over a field $k$, reads, in degree $1$: $$\mathbf{Z}(1)_{\mathcal{M}}\simeq\mathbf{G}_m[-1].$$ How to see ...
1 vote
1 answer
383 views

Grothendieck rings and the Tannakian formalism

I understand that the Tannakian formalism (which I only "know" extremely superficially) is very important for the theory of motives. I guess "the" conjectural category of motives ...
8 votes
0 answers
587 views

Values of cohomology theory on a point

$\DeclareMathOperator\Sm{Sm}$It is a well-known fact that in algebraic topology, generalized cohomology theories are determined by their values on the point. I was wondering whether anything similar ...
10 votes
0 answers
481 views

What is the precise definition of "Hypergeometric motives over $\mathbb{Q}$"?

The question is as in the title, but here is some background: Section 4 of this paper by Beukers, Cohen and Mellit is called "Hypergeometric motive over $\mathbb{Q}$" but no actual (pure) ...
3 votes
1 answer
758 views

Motives and topological data analysis

Here is some meta mathematics question. During the last decade there has been some progress in the field of applied maths, called topological data analysis. The setup starts with some set of points in ...
11 votes
1 answer
893 views

K-equivalence ⇒ isomorphism of Chow motives?

An old conjecture of Bondal–Orlov–Kawamata predicts that K-equivalent varieties are D-equivalent, see Kawamata's paper D-equivalence and K-equivalence for definitions. In particular this applies to ...
26 votes
1 answer
1k views

What's motivic about $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy theory? What's motivic about correspondences?

I come today to mathoverflow to showcase some genuine confusion about the motivic world. I want to ask some questions before actually starting to study the subject, to build some sense of direction. I ...
1 vote
0 answers
270 views

Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory versus Weil cohomological theory [closed]

Can someone enlighten me what is the difference between an Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory ( See here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eilenberg%E2%80%93Steenrod_axioms ), and a Weil ...
2 votes
0 answers
137 views

Thickness of category of abelian motives

A motive over a field $k$ is of abelian type if it belongs to the thick and rigid subcategory of Chow motives spanned by the motives of abelian varieties over $k$. I understand that this is the ...
1 vote
0 answers
90 views

The splitting pattern of the Killing form of an algebraic group and the Tits index

Let us assume that $G$ is an anisotropic semisimple, connected algebraic group over a field $k$ of characteristic zero. Let $K_G$ denote the class of its Killing form in the Witt ring of $k$. Let $X$ ...
37 votes
1 answer
3k views

Morava on Shafarevich conjecture

$\DeclareMathOperator\Q{\mathbf{Q}}$Jack Morava has some interesting ideas stemming from stable homotopy theory and geometric topology on the Shafarevich Conjecture. The Shafarevich Conjecture states: ...
4 votes
1 answer
237 views

What are the consequences of the finite generation of $\operatorname{Ext}^1_{\mathcal{O}_F}(\mathbb{1},M)$?

Let $F$ be a number fields. Conjecturally, there is a rigid $\mathbb{Q}$-linear abelian category of mixed motives over $F$. Let $\mathbb{1}$ denotes the unit object of this category. Given a mixed ...
6 votes
1 answer
652 views

$l$-adic periods?

For an algebraic variety $X$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ the comparison isomorphism between Betti and de Rham cohomologies provides the theory of periods with a motivic context whose reformulation as motivic ...
9 votes
0 answers
439 views

Uncountably many non-isomorphic Tate modules

Do there exist uncountably many abelian surfaces with good reduction over $\mathbb{Q}_p$ with pairwise non-isomorphic rational $p$-adic Tate modules? If we took $l$-adic Tate modules there would be ...
2 votes
0 answers
245 views

What unramified Galois representations come from geometry?

I think we don't know what crystalline representations come from geometry. What about the unramified ones? Specifically let $\phi:\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}_p}/\mathbb{Q}_p)\to GL_n(\mathbb{Q}...
9 votes
0 answers
361 views

Would full resolution of singularities have cohomological implications beyond the alteration theory?

De Jong's result on alterations allows one to show the potential semistability of certain Galois representations arising from cohomology of varieties (among other things). If we knew the existence of ...
4 votes
0 answers
108 views

Algorithmically recover the $l'$-adic Galois representation from the $l$-adic one (assuming the Tate conjecture)

Let $E$ be a number field. For any finite Galois extension $E\subset F$ there is a continuous homomorphism $\pi_F:\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{E}/E)\to \mathrm{Gal}(F/E)$. Let $X$ be a smooth projective ...
4 votes
0 answers
265 views

Explicit linear object underlying $l$-adic cohomology for almost all $l$

If you are working with closed manifolds you can consider cohomology with any coefficients you like but ultimately everything is determined by the singular cohomology with $\mathbb{Z}$-coefficients. ...
9 votes
0 answers
276 views

Which field extensions do not affect Chow groups?

Let $X$ be a (say, smooth projective) variety over a field $k$. For which $K$ it is known that the ("ordinary", that is, not higher) Chow groups of $X$ map onto that of $X_K$ bijectively? ...
3 votes
1 answer
174 views

Are "strongly finite dimensional" homotopy invariant sheaves with transfers (locally) constant?

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $S$ be a homotopy invariant $\mathbb{Q}$-linear sheaf with transfers in the sense of Voevodsky–Suslin, and assume that the dimension of $S(U)$ (over $\...
3 votes
0 answers
300 views

Why the scissor relations in Grothendieck rings?

Let $k$ be a field, and let $K_0(V_k)$ be the Grothendieck ring of $k$-varieties. One type of relation which defines $K_0(V_k)$ is the following: if $A$ is a $k$-variety and $C$ a closed subset of $A$,...
5 votes
0 answers
383 views

What is the motive of $\operatorname{Bun}_G(X)$?

$\DeclareMathOperator\Bun{Bun}$Let $X$ be a scheme over algebraically closed field $k$, $G$ a reductive group and $\Bun_G(X)$ the stack of $G$ bundles on $X$. Write $[\Bun_G(X)]\in K_\text{st}$ for ...
8 votes
2 answers
2k views

Hodge standard conjecture in positive characteristic

In the Wikipedia article on the Hodge Standard Conjecture it is written (note [Oct. 2015]: it has since been fixed): In characteristic zero the Hodge standard conjecture holds, being a consequence ...
2 votes
0 answers
118 views

Adjoining data about singularities to "correct" the category of pure motives?

There are a few well known constructions of potential categories of pure motives for smooth projective varieties over a field. My understanding is that modulo the standard conjectures these should be ...
15 votes
2 answers
853 views

Galois group for 0-dimensional motives

It is my understanding that in dimension 0, the theory of motives should just be Galois theory for fields. I am hoping to find a reference or two to help me get some things straightened out. One can ...
3 votes
1 answer
477 views

Arc space & formal loops in motivic integration

One of the most essential ingredients in the theory of motivic integration are the space of arcs of a given $k$-variety $X$. This is a scheme, whose $k$-rational points are the $k[[t]]$-valued points ...
3 votes
0 answers
178 views

Finiteness results in the category of schemes up to $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy

In algebraic geometry, we know that there exist geometrical conditions on a scheme $X/k$ for having finitely many rational points when $k$ is a number field. Namely for curves there is the Mordell ...
1 vote
1 answer
245 views

Pseudo-Abelian Completion in the constrution of Motifs (by Y. Manin)

I reading Yuri Manin's famous paper on "CORRESPONDENCES, MOTIFS AND MONOIDAL TRANSFORMATIONS" and struggle with his definition for so called pseudo-abelian completion given on page 453 by a reason I ...
1 vote
0 answers
107 views

Why is $\Delta - p_0 - p_{2}$ a projector?

I apologize in advance, since I am probably doing a very naive mistake in my computation. I am learning about pure (Chow / Grothendieck) motives. One of the first steps is to consider the category ...
4 votes
1 answer
273 views

Definition field of weight homomorphism and moduli interpretation of Shimura varieties

In "Canonical models of Shimura curves" by J.S. Milne (avaliable at https://www.jmilne.org/math/articles/2003a.pdf), he explains the definition of quaternion Shimura curve, and explains the modern ...
8 votes
1 answer
603 views

How much of the category of motives can be recovered from automorphisms of the Betti functor

Say we are working with schemes over a field $k\subset \mathbb{C}.$ A motive in the sense of Voevodsky is a functor $Sch\to D^bVect$ from (an appropriate category of) schemes to the DG category of ...
4 votes
1 answer
1k views

Gauss--Manin connection for de Rham realisation

Let $X$ and $S$ be smooth schemes of finite type over a field $k$ and let $\pi:X\to S$ be a smooth morphism of finite type. The relative de Rham cohomology $H^i_{dR}(X/S)$ of $X$ over $S$ is a ...
1 vote
0 answers
228 views

Motivic integration of an Abelian variety and its dual are same?

Let $A$ be an abelian variety over $\mathbb{C}$ and $A^*$ the dual Abelian variety. The class of $A$ and the class of $A^*$ in $\mathcal{M}_{\mathbb{C}}=K_0(Var_\mathbb{C})[\mathcal{L}^{- 1}]$ are ...
21 votes
1 answer
1k views

When simple cohomological computations predict ingenious algebro-geometric constructions?

Classical algebraic geometry is full of ingenious constructions and miraculous coincidences: 27 lines on a cubic surface are related to Weyl lattice of type $E_6,$ lines on an intersection of four-...
2 votes
0 answers
263 views

Brauer groups and del Pezzo surfaces

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $0$ und let $X$ be a del Pezzo surface over $k$. Note that $X$ may not have points. Let us consider $N:=\ker(\mathrm{Br}(k) \rightarrow \mathrm{Br}(k(X))$. ...
3 votes
1 answer
249 views

Motivic class of mixed Tate motive

Let $k$ be a field (of characteristic zero), $R$ be a ring and let $X\in DM(k;R)$ be a Tate motive. By definition, this means that $X$ is a summand of an object of the smallest strictly full ...
7 votes
1 answer
552 views

Motivation for Suslin’s Rigidity Conjecture

Suslin Rigidity conjecture states that motivic cohomology $$ H_{\mathcal{M}}^1(\operatorname{Spec}(F),\mathbb{Q}(n)) $$ of the field $F$ coincides with motivic cohomology for the subfield of ...
12 votes
1 answer
596 views

An inverse problem for Grothendieck rings of varieties

Suppose $A$ is a given commutative ring, and suppose that one knows that $A$ is isomorphic to the Grothendieck ring of $k$-varieties for some unknown field $k$. Can $k$ be recovered from $A$ ? If ...
21 votes
1 answer
757 views

What should motives for $L(E,n)$ look like?

Goncharov and Manin showed in this paper that the zeta values $\zeta(n)$ can be realized as periods of framed mixed Tate motives constructed from moduli spaces $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,n+3}$ of ...
42 votes
0 answers
2k views

Are we better in computing integrals than mathematicians of 19th century?

When I started to learn mathematics, I was fascinating by legendary «Демидович»: problems in mathematical analysis. Fifteen years later, when I open chapters about integrals, I see a long list of ...
6 votes
2 answers
600 views

Why is the triangulated category of motives easier than the abelian one?

There are several expository articles with the title "You could have invented [insert something mysterious here]" (a notable one being about spectral sequences, possibly it even started this genre). ...
1 vote
0 answers
305 views

Does the pure motive determine the Voevodsky motive?

I do not quite understand the construction of Voevodsky motives yet. Let $k$ be a field (possibly not algebraically closed), $X$ be a connected smooth projective $k$-scheme. Does the motive of $X$ in ...
6 votes
3 answers
1k views

Motives and homotopy theories of algebraic varieties

The theory of motives is an attempt to cope with the fact that there are many reasonable cohomology theories of algebraic varieties. Now, sometimes your cohomology theory does not just give you a ...
4 votes
2 answers
569 views

Current status of independence of Betti numbers for different Weil cohomology theories

Previous problem: Is $\operatorname{dim} H^1$ of an abelian variety the same for any Weil cohomology? Let $X$ be an smooth projective variety over a field $k$. For any Weil cohomology theory for ...

1
2
3 4 5
8