Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
71 votes
1 answer
8k views

What is the relationship between motivic cohomology and the theory of motives?

I will begin by giving a rough sketch of my understanding of motives. In many expositions about motives (for example, http://www.jmilne.org/math/xnotes/MOT102.pdf), the category of motives is defined ...
Makhalan Duff's user avatar
108 votes
7 answers
21k views

What is the field with one element?

I've heard of this many times, but I don't know anything about it. What I do know is that it is supposed to solve the problem of the fact that the final object in the category of schemes is one-...
Benjamin Antieau's user avatar
24 votes
3 answers
4k views

Are there "motivic" proofs of Weil conjectures in special cases?

This is a question meant as a first step to get into reading more on Weil conjectures and standard conjectures. It is known that the standard conjectures on vanishing of cycles would imply the Weil ...
Anweshi's user avatar
  • 7,442
35 votes
4 answers
8k views

What would a "moral" proof of the Weil Conjectures require?

At the very end of this 2006 interview (rm), Kontsevich says "...many great theorems are originally proven but I think the proofs are not, kind of, "morally right." There should be better proofs......
bhwang's user avatar
  • 1,764
34 votes
2 answers
6k views

Derived Algebraic Geometry and Chow Rings/Chow Motives

I recently heard a talk about Chow motives and also read Milne's exposition on motives. If I understand it correctly, the naive definition of the Chow ring would be that it simply consists of all ...
Lennart Meier's user avatar
32 votes
4 answers
3k views

Spectrum of the Grothendieck ring of varieties

Here's a problem that may ultimately require just simple algebraic-geometry skills to be solved, or perhaps it's very deep and will never be solved at all. From the comments, some literature and my ...
Ilya Nikokoshev's user avatar
31 votes
1 answer
4k views

For which varieties is the natural map from the Chow ring to integral cohomology an isomorphism?

My apologies if this question is too naive. Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex variety. There is a natural map $A^{\bullet}(X) \to H^{2\bullet}(X)$ of graded rings from the Chow ring of $X$ to ...
Qiaochu Yuan's user avatar
29 votes
3 answers
2k views

$\zeta(n)$ as a mixed Tate motive

I am trying to understand why there exists, for each $n \geq 2$, a mixed Tate motive $M$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ such that $M \in Ext^1_{MT(\mathbb{Q})}(\mathbb{Q}(0), \mathbb{Q}(n))$ and $\zeta(n)$, ...
mtm93's user avatar
  • 291
29 votes
1 answer
2k views

Is there a higher Grothendieck ring of varieties?

Fix a field $k$. The Grothendieck ring $K_0(\mathrm{Var}_k)$ of varieties over $k$ is defined as the quotient of the free abelian group on isomorphism classes of algebraic varieties by the scissor ...
Gring's user avatar
  • 293
26 votes
1 answer
4k views

Voevodsky's counterexample to the existence of a motivic t-structure

I have been trying to unravel some of the known relationships between various ideas on mixed motives. I find the literature quite hard to follow -"from experts, for experts". Voevodsky in "...
plm's user avatar
  • 982
12 votes
1 answer
1k views

Relation between motives and geometric Langlands

When working over a number field (or a function field over a finite field), one predicts that the Langlands program is related to the theory of motives over this field. There are several ways I have ...
JustLikeNumberTheory's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
2k views

How does the conjectural Langlands group fit into the Tannakian point of view?

I've read that one way to formulate the Langlands program is the following: Let $\mathcal{L}_ {\mathbb{Q}}$ be the conjectural Langlands group. Then the category of semi-simple (continuous) ...
8 votes
2 answers
793 views

Some questions about the map $K_0(\text{Var})\to K_0(\text{Mot})$

Let $k$ be a field. The naive Grothendieck ring of varieties $K_0(\text{Var})$ is generated by isomorphism classes of varieties over $k$ with the scissors relation $[X]=[X-Y]+[Y]$ for $Y$ a closed ...
peterx's user avatar
  • 693
8 votes
1 answer
989 views

How to think about $\mathbf{Z}(n)_{\mathcal{M}}$

One definition of motivic cohomology for smooth schemes $X$ over a field, is via Friedlander-Suslin complexes. A refresher (you may skip to the question at the bottom) One defines (1) $z_n(X,d) :=$...
user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
406 views

Are exotic affine spaces motivic/whatever equivalent to affine space?

This question is inspired by this MO question; in turn by this MO; in turn by these MO, MO. An exotic affine space is an affine variety $V$ whose $\mathbb{C}$-points are diffeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^{...
Alexander Chervov's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
154 views

Connecting Quillen functors between motivic homotopy categories (of different "types"): references?

For a perfect base field $k$ there exists the following collection of "motivic homotopy" categories related to it: (a) the homotopy category of simplicial presheaves (from smooth $k$-varieties); here ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
141 votes
0 answers
13k views

Grothendieck-Teichmüller conjecture

(1) In "Esquisse d'un programme", Grothendieck conjectures Grothendieck-Teichmüller conjecture: the morphism $$ G_{\mathbb{Q}} \longrightarrow Aut(\widehat{T}) $$ is an isomorphism. Here $...
AFK's user avatar
  • 7,527
45 votes
2 answers
3k views

Langlands in dimension 2: the Yoshida conjecture

Background: One prominent part of the Langlands program is the conjecture that all motives are automorphic. It is of interest to consider special cases that are more precise, if less sweeping. ...
Laie's user avatar
  • 1,704
42 votes
1 answer
6k views

Progress on the standard conjectures on algebraic cycles

What's the current state of these conjectures? Who is working on them? In "Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles" Grothendieck says: "They would form the basis of the so-called "theory of ...
user avatar
42 votes
0 answers
2k views

Are we better in computing integrals than mathematicians of 19th century?

When I started to learn mathematics, I was fascinating by legendary «Демидович»: problems in mathematical analysis. Fifteen years later, when I open chapters about integrals, I see a long list of ...
41 votes
4 answers
4k views

Understanding the definition of the Lefschetz (pure effective) motive

For all those who are unlikely to have answers to my questions, I provide some Background: In some sense, pure motives are generalisations of smooth projective varieties. Every Weil cohomology ...
Konrad Voelkel's user avatar
30 votes
1 answer
4k views

Reasons for the use of Nisnevich topology in motivic homotopy theory

The objects of interest in motivic homotopy theory are "spaces"-which are simplicial sheaves of sets on the big Nisnevich site $Sm/k$ of smooth schemes of finite type over a field $k$. I understand ...
Carl's user avatar
  • 805
18 votes
1 answer
6k views

Deligne's proof of Ramanujan's conjecture

I am trying to understand Deligne's proof of the Ramanujan conjecture and more generally how one associates geometric objects (ultimately, motives) to modular forms. As the first step, which I ...
Evgeny Shinder's user avatar
17 votes
1 answer
1k views

Why presheaves with transfer?

Presheaves with transfer are a main technical ingredient in Voevodsky's construction of his category of mixed motives. From the perspective of motivic homotopy theory, the only difference between SH ...
Fabian Carlström's user avatar
15 votes
1 answer
2k views

Moduli space of motives vs moduli space of varieties

A (projective) abelian variety $A$ over the complex numbers is determined by $H^1(A,\mathbb{Z})$ together with its Hodge structure and polarization. This miracle means that one can parametrise ...
eric's user avatar
  • 829
13 votes
1 answer
973 views

Which degree does a motivic Galois representation show up in?

Consider a representation $\rho: \operatorname{Gal} (\overline{\mathbb Q} | \mathbb Q ) \to GL_n ( \overline{\mathbb Q}_\ell)$ that is a subrepresentation of $H^i(X, \overline{\mathbb Q}_\ell (j))$ ...
Will Sawin's user avatar
  • 148k
12 votes
3 answers
2k views

Motivic vs Deligne cohomology

Where can I find the construction of the cycle class map from motivic cohomology to Deligne cohomology of smooth projective varieties over the complex numbers? It should be a construction by Bloch ...
user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
608 views

Reference - motives of curves

There is a really interesting comment in this question that I was unable to find a reference... Under the "Tate conjectures, then every motive belongs to the tensor category generated by motives of ...
Lucas's user avatar
  • 121
12 votes
2 answers
3k views

Mysterious quotes (at least for me)

I heard two quotes, one from Alain Connes and an other one from Orlov. Alain Connes was talking about noncommutative geometry and he said the following: " a noncommutative algebra creates its own ...
Max's user avatar
  • 1,607
11 votes
1 answer
967 views

How to think about infinite generatedness of motivic cohomology

In this question I previously asked how to think about the motivic complex $\mathbf{Z}(1)_{\mathcal{M}}$, whose Zariski hypercohomology should morally be the "singular cohomology" $H^*((-)\wedge S^{2n}...
user avatar
11 votes
2 answers
1k views

The vanishing of $MGL^{2n+i,n}(X)$; do spectra of smooth projective varieties generate $SH_{l}$?

I have two questions related to the stable motivic homotopy categories of Morel-Voevodsky. The first is probably simple; I wonder what is known on the second one. For the algebraic cobordism theory $...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
11 votes
0 answers
2k views

What are "fractional motives"?

Kirti Joshi's musings mention "fractional motives". Do you know what are they good for and what the current state of constructions is for them? Edit: Further cases of "fractional motives" as ...
Thomas Riepe's user avatar
  • 10.8k
10 votes
1 answer
947 views

Derived version of equivalence between motives and representations of Motivic galois groups?

A slight variant $\tilde Mot_{num}(k,\mathbb{Q})$ of the category of pure motives $Mot_{num}(k,\mathbb{Q})$ is a Tannakian category equivalent to a category of representations of some algebraic group $...
tttbase's user avatar
  • 1,720
8 votes
1 answer
813 views

Is Scholl construction of modular motives related to Deligne's construction of $\ell$-adic representations?

First of all, I need to declare my extreme ignorance on the topic of modular forms, so, please, does not assume that I know Deligne's construction in details. In Motives for modular forms, Scholl ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 2,227
8 votes
1 answer
846 views

A Naive Question on Mixed Motives and Mixed Hodge Structures

As a physicist, I have some naive questions about mixed motives and its mixed Hodge structure (MHS) realization. Any references, comments, answers will be appreciated! The category of mixed motives ...
Wenzhe's user avatar
  • 2,971
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

motivic t-structure and realisations

Let $k$ be a field and $DM_k$ denote the triangulated category of geometric motives with $ \mathbb{Q}$ coeffients over $k$. Recall that there exists a motive functor $M: Var_k\rightarrow DM_k$, which ...
user's user avatar
  • 81
7 votes
1 answer
787 views

Special cases of the Kimura-O’Sullivan conjecture, i.e., examples of finite dimensional motives?

In this 2005 paper, Kimura introduces a notion of finite dimensionality for Chow motives, defined in terms of vanishing of high symmetric and wedge powers. Toward the end of his paper, he conjectures ...
Tyler Foster's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
433 views

Is $\operatorname{dim} H^1$ of an abelian variety the same for any Weil cohomology?

Let $A$ be an abelian variety over a field $k$ of dimension $g$, and $H$ be a Weil cohomology theory for smooth projective varieties over $k$ with characteristic $0$ coefficient field $E$. Is it ...
Zhiyu's user avatar
  • 6,622
6 votes
4 answers
2k views

References - Voevodsky motives are the derived category of Nori motives?

First I would like to know if this has been worked out, and if the answer is affirmative I would like to know some references.
tttbase's user avatar
  • 1,720
6 votes
0 answers
230 views

Nice references for injective model structures and Quillen functors between motivic homotopy categories

It seems that for the injective model structures for the categories simplicial presheaves and simplicial Nisnevich sheaves (on the category of smooth varieties over a perfect field $k$) there exist ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
450 views

Constructing groups of Type E7 with certain Tits Index

In a new survey on $E_8$, namely Skip Garibaldi - E8 the most exceptional group , the author gives an example (Example 8.4., page 15) on how to construct a group of type E8 with a prescribed Tits-...
nxir's user avatar
  • 1,479
5 votes
1 answer
468 views

Any "motive"(-like) theory which can catch that cusp $y^2=x^3$ (and similar) are non-trivial?

Consider cusp $y^2=x^3$ which can also be described as $k[z]~without~z$ , taking $x=z^3,y=z^2$. Algebraically its $Spec$ is quite different from $k$. For example: it has plenty non-trivial "line-...
Alexander Chervov's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
265 views

Explicit linear object underlying $l$-adic cohomology for almost all $l$

If you are working with closed manifolds you can consider cohomology with any coefficients you like but ultimately everything is determined by the singular cohomology with $\mathbb{Z}$-coefficients. ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
438 views

Virtual Lefschetz motive

Hi there, I have a question which popped up while reading papers on motives. Let $V_k$ be the category of (projective) k-varieties, and let $K_0(V_k)$ be the Grothendieck ring of $V_k$; then $\...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,547
2 votes
0 answers
261 views

Codimension restrictions on intersections

This is a question I stumbled across earlier this week. I see a similar one has been asked here. Suppose I have a smooth quasi projective variety $X$ over a field $K$, and I call $\text{Chow}^r(X\...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
589 views

Are finite correspondances flat?

In Voevodsky&Mazza&Weibel's book on motivic cohomology they define "an elementary correspondance from X (Smooth connected scheme over $k$) to Y (separated scheme over $k$) as an irreducible ...
Tintin's user avatar
  • 2,871