Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
8 votes
2 answers
567 views

Darboux property of non-atomic sigma-additive nonnegative measures equivalent to the AC?

A result commonly, and probably erroneously, attributed to W. Sierpiński is that every non-atomic, countably additive, nonnegative measure $\mu: \Sigma \to \bf R$, where $\Sigma$ is a sigma-algebra on ...
Salvo Tringali's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
774 views

Does PA prove (Artemov-style) the consistency of a stronger system?

There was a recent question on Artemov's paper here on MO Situation with Artemov's paper? In one of the answers there it was asserted (apparently incorrectly - see Noah Schweber's comments and ...
abo's user avatar
  • 1,974
8 votes
2 answers
1k views

Is there one binary operation foundational for set theory?

The membership relationship "$\in$" is foundational for set theory, in the sense that the axioms of any set theory are formulated in the language of "$\in$". Naturally, the ...
Ioachim Drugus's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
799 views

Is equality of terms for "real" numbers with roots, logarithm, exponential, sin, cos, and other trigonometric operations decidable with a Turing-machine?

If yes, how? Also, I know you can't do it for arbitrary statements about real numbers, but that's not what I'm asking, and by "real" numbers, I mean the numbers constructible from 1, -, /, and the ...
tailcalled's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
536 views

Is $\in$-induction provable in first order Zermelo set theory?

Are there models of first order Zermelo set theory (axiomatized by: Extensionaity, Foundation, empty set, pairing, set union, power, Separation, infinity) in which $\in$-induction fail? I asked this ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
6 votes
3 answers
444 views

Is $0^{(\omega)}$ a minimal cover in the arithmetic degrees

Is it known if $0^{(\omega)}$ a minimal cover in the arithmetic degrees? In the Turing degrees to show that $0'$ (indeed $0^{(n)}$) isn't a minimal cover one uses the density of r.e. degrees. ...
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
5 votes
2 answers
1k views

How to define compatible topology for first-order structures?

Background Because a bounded distributive lattice can be represented by the clopen sets of a Priestley space, I tried to learn some basics about Priestley spaces. After reading (on Wikipedia) A ...
Thomas Klimpel's user avatar
5 votes
5 answers
2k views

Defining 'free monoid' without Nat?

Is there a definition of what is a 'free monoid' which does not pre-suppose that the natural numbers has already been defined? The definitions that I have been able to track down all use the natural ...
Jacques Carette's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
597 views

Can every cancellative invertible-free monoid be embedded in a group?

A monoid is invertible-free if $xy=1$ implies $x=y=1$ for all $x,y$. Question: Can every cancellative invertible-free monoid be embedded in a group? I'm fairly sure that a quotient of the free product ...
David Pokorny's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
406 views

Computational approach deciding whether a set of Wang Tile could tile the space up to some size

As an applied person, I'm facing one practical problem deciding whether a set of Wang tile could tile the plane periodically or aperiodically. Although both problems seem undecidable, but I'm on a ...
user40780's user avatar
  • 867
5 votes
0 answers
218 views

Improving a Lindstrom-y fact about $\mathcal{L}_{\omega_1,\omega}$?

See e.g. the last section of Ebbinghaus/Flum/Thomas for the relevant background on abstract model theory. Below, all languages are finite for simplicity. "$HC$" is the set of hereditarily ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
790 views

What is lost in General Relativity without Hahn-Banach axiom in the ZF+HB set theory?

In the same spirit of this question: How much of mathematical General Relativity depends on the Axiom of Choice? I want to go radically further ahead and ask for what remains of mathematical general ...
Bastam Tajik's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
720 views

Can the Burgess-Hazen analysis of Predicative Arithmetic be extended to Transfinite Types?

Around page 300 of his book "Mathematical Thought and its Objects", Charles Parsons discusses the work of Edward Nelson, who believes that mathematical induction is impredicative, because it can be ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
2k views

Independence of PA implies independence of PA union all true $\Pi_1$ statements

Prove that if a statement is independent of Peano Arithmetic (PA), then it's also independent of PA$_1$, where PA$_1$ is the union of the set of axioms in PA and the set of all true $\Pi_1$ statements....
Zirui Wang's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
368 views

Ordinal analysis and nonrecursive ordinals

Ordinal analysis is typically described as characterizing recursive ordinals in a theory $T$, but there is a sense in which it can characterize all $T$-ordinals, even those that are nonrecursive. ...
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
709 views

Extendibility vs supercompactness

The following quotes comes from "Cantor's Attic"'s page on supercompacts: If κ is $|V_{κ+η}|$-supercompact with $η<κ$ then it is preceeded by a stationary set of $η$-extendible cardinals. If $κ$ ...
Julian Barathieu's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
203 views

Does $|(X\times\{0\}) \cup (X\times\{1\})| \leq |X|$ for $X$ infinite imply ${\sf AC}$?

Consider the statement For any infinite set $X$ there is an injection $\varphi$ from $(X\times\{0\}) \cup (X\times\{1\})$ into $X$. Does this imply the ${\sf AC}$?
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
973 views

Compactness and completeness in Gödel logic

The standard proof of the completeness theorem in first-order Gödel logic is based on a first-order countable language. I want to know that is there any proof of the completeness theorem in first-...
amin's user avatar
  • 49
2 votes
1 answer
143 views

Does adding definability axiom expressed in infinitary language to ZF, let all models be pointwise definable?

This posting is generally related to a prior posting titled "Are all constructible from below sets parameter free definable?" If we work in infinitary language $\mathcal L_{\omega_1, \omega}$...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
114 votes
2 answers
12k views

How would you solve this tantalizing Halmos problem?

$1-ab$ invertible $\implies$ $1-ba$ invertible has a slick power series "proof" as below, where Halmos asks for an explanation of why this tantalizing derivation succeeds. Do you know one? Geometric ...
Bill Dubuque's user avatar
  • 4,736
74 votes
8 answers
14k views

Category theory and set theory: just a different language, or different foundation of mathematics?

This is a question to research mathematicians, as well as to those concerned with the history and philosophy of mathematics. I am asking for a reference. In order to make the reference request as ...
Claus's user avatar
  • 6,937
72 votes
13 answers
19k views

Logic in mathematics and philosophy

What are the relations between logic as an area of (modern) philosophy and mathematical logic. The world "modern" refers to 20th century and later, and I am curious mainly about the second ...
Gil Kalai's user avatar
  • 24.7k
60 votes
7 answers
9k views

Does anyone still seriously doubt the consistency of $ZFC$?

As someone self-taught in set theory beginning with Donald Monk’s excellent book on MK set theory, $ZFC$ has always seemed like a weak set theory. Despite this, the majority of professional ...
60 votes
8 answers
6k views

Is the ultraproduct concept fundamentally category-theoretic?

Once again, I would like to take advantage of the large number of knowledgable category theorists on this site for a question I have about category-theoretic aspects of a fundamental logic concept. My ...
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
59 votes
8 answers
8k views

Cauchy reals and Dedekind reals satisfy "the same mathematical theorems"

The succinct question The conjecture of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer (to take a random example) mentions L-functions and hence the complex numbers and hence the real numbers (because the complexes are ...
Kevin Buzzard's user avatar
49 votes
1 answer
2k views

Producing finite objects by forcing!

It is a trivial fact that forcing can not produce finite sets of ground model objects. However there are situations, where we can use forcing to prove the existence of finite objects with some ...
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
47 votes
5 answers
10k views

Set theory and Model Theory

This question probably doesn't make any sense, but I don't see why, so I ask it here hoping someone will illuminate the matter: There is this whole area of study in Set Theory about the consistency, ...
Enrique Acosta's user avatar
46 votes
2 answers
2k views

Applications of Zorn’s lemma that aren’t chain-complete/directed-complete?

Zorn’s Lemma applies to posets in which every chain has an upper bound. However, in all applications I know, the poset is also evidently chain-complete — chains have least upper bounds. A few ...
Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine's user avatar
44 votes
2 answers
4k views

Is multiplication implicitly definable from successor?

A relation $R$ is implicitly definable in a structure $M$ if there is a formula $\varphi(\dot R)$ in the first-order language of $M$ expanded to include relation $R$, such that $M\models\varphi(\dot R)...
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
43 votes
1 answer
2k views

Do the analogies between metamathematics of set theory and arithmetic have some deeper meaning?

By "formal analogies" between the metamathematics of $\mathsf{ZFC}$/set theory and $\mathsf{PA}$(=Peano Arithmetic)/first order arithmetic, I mean facts such as the following: We are considering a ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k
43 votes
9 answers
5k views

The sets in mathematical logic

It is well known that intuitive set theory (or naive set theory) is characterized by having paradoxes, e.g. Russell's paradox, Cantor's paradox, etc. To avoid these and any other discovered or ...
zzzhhh's user avatar
  • 764
40 votes
3 answers
5k views

How much of mathematical General Relativity depends on the Axiom of Choice?

One of the cornerstones of the mathematical formulation of General Relativity (GR) is the result (due to Choquet-Bruhat and others) that the initial value problem for the Einstein field equations is ...
Pelota's user avatar
  • 655
39 votes
7 answers
6k views

Is V, the Universe of Sets, a fixed object?

When I first read Set Theory by Jech, I came under the impression that the Universe of Sets, $V$ was a fixed, well defined object like $\pi$ or the Klein four group. However as I have read on, I am ...
Elie Ben-Shlomo's user avatar
39 votes
3 answers
5k views

For which Millennium Problems does undecidable -> true?

Three good answers were received — by Alex Gavrilov, Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen, and Terry Tao — and the bounty has been awarded (somewhat arbitrarily) to Alex Gavrilov. The answers ...
39 votes
5 answers
4k views

A “mother of all groups”? What kind of structures have "mother of all"s?

For ordered fields, we have a “mother of all ordered fields”, the surreal numbers $\mathbf{No}$, a proper-class “field” which includes (an isomorphic copy of) every other ordered field as a subfield. ...
The_Sympathizer's user avatar
38 votes
1 answer
3k views

Is the area of the Mandelbrot provably computable?

Recall the Mandelbrot set $M$ is the set of points $c$ in the complex plane such that the sequence $z_0 = 0, z_{n+1} = z_n^2 + c$ is bounded. It is well-known that $M$ is a compact set of positive ...
Jason Rute's user avatar
  • 6,287
37 votes
1 answer
3k views

Community experiences writing Lamport's structured proofs

About two years ago, I came across this paper by Lamport http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/lamport/pubs/lamport-how-to-write.pdf on writing proofs hierarchically. It changed how I wrote ...
37 votes
4 answers
2k views

Is the field of constructible numbers known to be decidable?

By the field of constructible numbers I mean the union of all finite towers of real quadratic extensions beginning with $\mathbb{Q}$. By decidable I mean the set of first order truths in this field, ...
Colin McLarty's user avatar
36 votes
3 answers
3k views

The set-theoretic multiverse as a (bi)category

Joel Hamkin's The set-theoretic multiverse has featured in MO questions before, e.g., here and here. But I was wondering about the best category theoretic angle to take on it. In the paper Joel ...
David Corfield's user avatar
36 votes
6 answers
5k views

Does finite mathematics need the axiom of infinity?

A statement referring to an infinite set can sometimes be logically rephrased using only finite sets/objects. For example, "The set of primes is infinite" <-> "There is no largest prime". ...
Andrew Critch's user avatar
36 votes
8 answers
2k views

Does the truth of any statement of real matrix algebra stabilize in sufficiently high dimensions?

This question is related to this recent but currently unanswered MO question of Ricky Demer, where it arose as a comment. Consider the structure $R^n$ consisting of $n\times n$ matrices over the ...
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
35 votes
15 answers
2k views

Objects which can't be defined without making choices but which end up independent of the choice

It happens a lot of times that when one defines a new object (ring, module, space, group, algebra, morphism, whatever) out of given data, one first chooses some additional structure. And sometimes (...
35 votes
8 answers
3k views

Examples of statements with a high quantifier complexity

What are some natural properties, definitions, and statements that require many alternating quantifiers? The complexity could be $\Pi^0_k$, $\Pi^1_k$, $\Pi^V_k$, or something else entirely, as long $k$...
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
35 votes
9 answers
14k views

What is... a grossone?

Y. Sergeyev developed a positional system for representing infinite numbers using a basic unit called a "grossone", as well as what he calls an "infinity computer". The ...
Mikhail Katz's user avatar
  • 16.6k
35 votes
9 answers
3k views

Are there examples of statements that have been proven whose consistency proofs came before their proofs?

I'm wondering if there are examples of statements that have been proven whose consistency proofs came before the proofs of the statements themselves. More informally, I'm wondering how promising in ...
Chris Jerdonek's user avatar
34 votes
3 answers
6k views

What would remain of current mathematics without axiom of power set? [closed]

The power set of every infinite set is uncountable. An infinite set (as an element of the power set) cannot be defined by writing the infinite sequence of its elements but only by a finite formula. By ...
user avatar
34 votes
5 answers
1k views

Does the exact pair phenomenon for partial orders occur in your area of mathematics?

Suppose that I have a partial order P and an increasing sequence $a_0< a_1<a_2<\cdots$ of elements of $P$. A pair of elements (b,c) from P is said to be an exact pair for this sequence, if ...
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
34 votes
4 answers
3k views

In what rigorous sense are Sperner's Lemma and the Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem equivalent?

I understand that one can give a proof of each of these propositions assuming the truth of the other. But this seems a bit squishy to me, since there is a trivial sense in which any two true theorems ...
James Propp's user avatar
  • 19.7k
33 votes
2 answers
2k views

Quantifier complexity of the definition of continuity of functions

This was previously asked at MSE, but I was told to ask it on MO. Consider the structure $(\mathbb{R};+,-,*,0,1,<)$. We adjoin to it a unary function $f$ defined everywhere on the set of real ...
user107952's user avatar
  • 2,023
33 votes
3 answers
5k views

Top-down mathematics, or "Where it all begins"

Sorry if this is off-topic. It was my attempt to take a top-down approach to mathematics. Being an inexperienced undergraduate (so please take my writing here lightly), I've been presented with ZFC as ...
steve's user avatar
  • 447

1 2 3
4
5
23