Skip to main content

Questions tagged [schemes]

The first purpose of schemes theory is the geometrical study of solutions of algebraic systems of equations, not only over the real/complex numbers, but also over integer numbers (and more generally over any commutative ring with 1). It was finalized by Alexandre Grothendieck, during the 1950s and the 1960s.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
3 answers
651 views

Sections of morphisms of schemes up to a finite morphism

Let $f:X\longrightarrow S$ be a flat projective morphism of regular integral noetherian schemes such that that the generic fibre $X_\eta\longrightarrow K(S)$ is a smooth projective connected curve ...
Amira's user avatar
  • 163
6 votes
1 answer
824 views

More on universal homeomorphisms

I would like to understand this notion better; where could I find some examples? In particular, I am interested in the following questions (and references for the answers). Is a universal ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
337 views

Is the pre-image of a regular subscheme with respect to a universal homeomorphism of regular schemes regular?

Let $f:X\to Y$ be a universal homeomorphism of regular (excellent finite-dimensional) schemes, $Z\subset Y$ be a regular subscheme. Is $f^{-1}(Z)$ necessarily regular?
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
220 views

When inverse image is conservative; a reference or a generalization?

I am interested in the following question: for $f$ being a morphism of schemes, which conditions ensure that $Rf^*_{et}$ is conservative? This is true if $f$ has a section or if $f$ is an \'etale ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
326 views

Classification of fat projective lines?

In section III.3.4 of Eisenbud & Harris's "The Geometry of Schemes," we/they construct an infinite family of double structures on $\mathbb{P}^1 \subset \mathbb{P}^3$ that are distinguished from ...
David Steinberg's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
735 views

Do all the main properties of constructible and perverse sheaves (in an 'arithmetic' situation) follow from results of Gabber?

This question is a continuation of Bad behaviour of perverse sheaves over 'general' bases? Let $S$ (for example) be a finite type separated scheme over $\mathbb{Z}$. I would like: (1) to ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
2k views

Coproducts of schemes ("gluing construction") ?

In this MO question it was raised the topic of "gluing constructions" in the category of schemes. I understand the phrase "gluing two schemes along maps to them" as "there exists a coproduct of the ...
Qfwfq's user avatar
  • 23.3k
1 vote
1 answer
338 views

Group scheme of infinite dimensional linear groups ?

Hi there, I know there are fairly straightforward ways to write down the schemes of infinite dimensional projective spaces (not restricting myself to only countable dimensions), but what happens with ...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,547
7 votes
2 answers
813 views

Scheme-theoretic account of why every variety embeds in a complete variety

The standard reference for the statement that "any abstract variety is an open subscheme of a complete variety" is Nagata's 1962 paper Imbedding of an abstract variety in a complete variety. ...
Charles Staats's user avatar
22 votes
1 answer
7k views

What are the monomorphisms in the category of schemes?

Someone recently asked what the epimorphisms in the category of schemes are; the other day I had been wondering about the similar question: what are the monomorphisms in the category of schemes? I am ...
Phillip Williams's user avatar
26 votes
1 answer
5k views

What are the epimorphisms in the category of schemes?

Is there a known characterization of epimorphisms in the category of schemes? It is easy to see that a morphism $f : X \to Y$ such that the underlying map $\lvert f\rvert$ is surjective and the ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
24 votes
2 answers
2k views

Does Zariski's Main Theorem come with a canonical factorization?

Zariski's Main Theorem (EGA IV, Thm 8.12.6): Suppose $Y$ is a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme, and $f:X\to Y$ is quasi-finite, separated, and finitely presented. Then $f$ factors as $X\...
Anton Geraschenko's user avatar
29 votes
1 answer
2k views

Why and how did preschemes become schemes?

Originally (e.g., in the first edition of EGA and in Mumford's Red Book), what are now called "schemes" were referred to as "preschemes." The word "scheme" was reserved for what are now called "...
3 votes
0 answers
361 views

A presentation of a scheme as a limit of smooth ones over finitely generated bases

Suppose that a scheme $S$ is separated, excellent, and has finite Krull dimension. Which of the following statements are true: If $S$ is regular, then it can be presented as a projective limit of ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
2k views

Diagonal map and "infinitesimal points"

Let $f:X\to Y$ be a morphism between schemes. To construct the relative sheaf of differentials on $X$ (relative to $Y$), we first consider the diagonal map $\Delta: X \to X\times_Y X$ and then define $...
Brian's user avatar
  • 1,510
5 votes
1 answer
1k views

How to compute cohomology groups of a closed subscheme Z of projective space, defined by a homogeneous polynomial of degree d?

Let $Z = \mathrm{Proj}\,k[x_{0},x_{1},\ldots,x_{r}]/f$ be a closed subscheme of degree $d$, i.e., $f$ is a homogeneous polynomial of degree $d$, and $\mathcal{O}_{Z}(1)=i^{*}\mathcal{O}_\mathbb{P}(1)$....
jaz's user avatar
  • 63
2 votes
2 answers
533 views

Do affine schemes form a Mal'cev category?

This may be a silly question, but I have no intuition in this direction. Every category internal to a Mal'cev category is a groupoid (this is why categories internal to $Grp$ are groupoids). If this ...
David Roberts's user avatar
  • 35.5k
31 votes
4 answers
5k views

The Frobenius morphism

I found the following list on the "Frobenius Page" by David Ben-Zvi, described by the author as "an outdated collection of intuitive ways to think about raising to the p-th power". Generates a ...
6 votes
0 answers
305 views

Does one need l to be invertible in S in order to consider the l-adic cohomology of S-schemes and motives?

When Ivorra defines the $l$-adic realization of $S$-motives (i.e. of Voevodsky's motives over a scheme $S$) he demands $l$ to be invertible in $S$. Is this condition really necessary? What happens ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
151 views

An (almost) terminological question: could one shorten the phrase 'the spectrum of the residue field of a point'?

For a scheme S I want to consider the spectra of the residue fields of points of S. Is there any way to make this phrase shorter? Is there a term for the morphism that connects such a spectrum with S?
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
60 votes
1 answer
7k views

Why "open immersion" rather than "open embedding"?

When topologists speak of an "immersion", they are quite deliberately describing something that is not necessarily an "embedding." But I cannot think of any use of the word "embedding" in algebraic ...
2 votes
0 answers
298 views

Induced groupoid schemes

This is a more direct version of this question, which was perhaps a bit obtuse. This is a more elementary formulation. Recall that for a groupoid scheme (or indeed any internal groupoid) $X = (X_1 \...
David Roberts's user avatar
  • 35.5k
16 votes
1 answer
2k views

Universal homeomorphisms and the étale topology

Let $f:X\to S$ be a universal homeomorphism of schemes. Assume $X(S')\neq\emptyset$ for some étale surjective $S'\to S$. Does $f$ have a section? The answer is yes if $S$ is reduced, by descent. ...
Laurent Moret-Bailly's user avatar
6 votes
3 answers
1k views

Intuition for rational functions

I asked this on mathematics stack exchange and did not receive answer . I hope it is good manners to ask here. Thank you very much. Let $X$ be integral scheme and $\mathcal K$ sheaf of rationnal ...
evgeniamerkulova's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
2k views

Scheme theoretic closure of a locallly closed subscheme

In the book "The Geometry of Schemes" of Eisenbud and Harris, page 26, it is said that the scheme theoretic closure of a closed subscheme Z of an open subscheme U is the closed subscheme of X defined ...
brunoh's user avatar
  • 1,128
8 votes
2 answers
910 views

Is this finite surjective flat morphism of 2 dimensional schemes a local complete intersection

Let $X$ be a regular integral noetherian scheme of dimension 2 and let $D$ be a simple normal crossings divisor in $X$. EDIT: Let $U = X-D$. Consider a finite etale morphism $V\longrightarrow U$ ...
Ariyan Javanpeykar's user avatar
39 votes
6 answers
9k views

What is the inverse image sheaf necessary for in algebraic geometry?

Given a continuous map $f \colon X \to Y$ of topological spaces, and a sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $Y$, the inverse image sheaf $f^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ is the sheafification of the presheaf $$U \mapsto \...
Charles Staats's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
433 views

Ever seen a ringed group?

A locally ringed space is a common generalization of schemes and various manifolds. I am wondering about a locally ringed group which should be a common generalization of group schemes and various Lie ...
Bugs Bunny's user avatar
  • 12.3k
4 votes
1 answer
3k views

Ringed and locally ringed spaces

A pair $(X,O_X)$ is a ringed space if $X$ is a topological space and $O_X$ is a sheaf of rings. If every stalk $O_{X,x}$ is a local ring, then we say that $(X,O_X)$ is a locally ringed space. In the ...
Jesus Martinez Garcia's user avatar
25 votes
4 answers
6k views

When is an irreducible scheme quasi-compact?

The standard examples of schemes that are not quasi-compact are either non-noetherian or have an infinite number of irreducible components. It is also easy to find non-separated irreducible examples. ...
David Rydh's user avatar
  • 5,039
1 vote
1 answer
445 views

Are morphisms of schemes generically affine

Let $f \colon X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes, where $X$ and $Y$ are separated integral Noetherian schemes. Does there necessarily exist a nonempty open affine $U \subset Y$ such that $f^{-1}(U)$ is ...
Charles Staats's user avatar
13 votes
4 answers
2k views

Replacing Spectrum with Valuations of a Field - An Alternative to Schemes?

A scheme is defined to be a sheaf which is locally isomorphic to the spectrum of a ring. The idea behind this is that given an affine coordinate ring of a variety over an algebraically closed field, ...
David Corwin's user avatar
  • 15.4k
5 votes
1 answer
1k views

Model of a scheme regular over the generic point

Let all schemes below be excellent. Let $X_0$ be a regular (not necessarily smooth, projective) non-empty scheme of finite type over the generic point $\eta$ of a regular connected scheme $S$. As the ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
456 views

If $f:X\to S$ is a universal homeomorphism, is $f':X\times_S X\to X$ a nil-immersion?

If $f:X\to S$ is a universal homeomorphism, is $f':X\times_S X\to X$ always a nil-immersion? This seems to be easy, yet possibly I miss something. Should I give references to this fact in a paper?
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
681 views

For a morphism f from a regular scheme, should there exist an open subscheme U of the target such that fibre of f at each point of U is regular

For a finite type morphism $f:X\to S$, $X$ is a regular scheme, should there always exist an open (dense) subscheme $U\subset S$ such that the fibre of $f$ at each Zariski point of $U$ is regular? All ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
2k views

Can a scheme be defined by gluing open affines such that the intersections are affine?

One way to think of a manifold is as a family of of open subsets $U_i \subset \mathbb{R}^n$, together with distinguished subsets $V_{ij} \subset U_i$ and isomorphisms $\psi_{ij}: V_{ij} \to V_{ji}$ ...
Akhil Mathew's user avatar
  • 25.6k
3 votes
0 answers
356 views

Colimit of an etale diagram of schemes

It is known that the category of schemes is not cocomplete (e.g. see this question: Colimits of schemes). However, do diagrams of schemes for which every morphism is etale have colimits? More ...
David Carchedi's user avatar
182 votes
33 answers
32k views

What should be learned in a first serious schemes course?

I've just finished teaching a year-long "foundations of algebraic geometry" class. It was my third time teaching it, and my notes are gradually converging. I've enjoyed it for a number of reasons (...
2 votes
1 answer
2k views

on the genus of a function field

Let $K$ be an algebraic function field of one variable. Then we can define its genus. On the other hand, it can also be seen as a scheme, so we can define the arithmetic and geometric genus. Could ...
Yujia Qiu's user avatar
  • 249
31 votes
7 answers
4k views

Categorical construction of the category of schemes?

The answer to the following question is probably well known or the question itself is well known not to have a reasonable answer. In the latter case could you please let me know what the "right" ...
algori's user avatar
  • 23.5k
12 votes
1 answer
480 views

Extending properties of commutative rings to schemes

I'm trying to pin down the various ways we can extend a property of commutative rings to a corresponding property for schemes. Let $P$ be a property of commutative rings. We could define a scheme $(X,\...
Beren Sanders's user avatar
11 votes
5 answers
8k views

When is the push-forward of the structure sheaf locally free

Let $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ be a morphism of noetherian schemes. Under what conditions is $f_\ast \mathcal{O}_X$ a locally free $\mathcal{O}_Y$-module? Example 1. Suppose that $f$ is affine. Then $f_\...
Ariyan Javanpeykar's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
303 views

Restriction of Proj S to D(f) is isomorphic to Spec S_{(f)}

$S$ is a graded ring (over non-negative integers), $f \in S_{+}$ is a homogeneous element of positive degree, $D(f)$ the elements of Proj $S$ not containing $f$. I don't see the bijection between $D(f)...
ashpool's user avatar
  • 2,857
6 votes
2 answers
740 views

Philosophy : seeking examples illuminating deeper geometric ideas behind base change of schemes

So for certain base changes, it's clear that 'base change' really means base change from high school : for example, if a curve is defined over a field, it will be of course defined over any extension ...
xuros's user avatar
  • 373
8 votes
2 answers
4k views

Closed subschemes and pulling back the structure sheaf via the inclusion map

I would just like a clarification related to closed subschemes. If $(X,{\cal O}_X)$ is a locally ringed space and $A\subset X$ is any subset with the subspace topology then $i^{-1}{\cal O}_X$ will be ...
Beren Sanders's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
987 views

Quotient morphisms in the category of schemes

Which morphisms of schemes (or varieties, if you prefer) $\pi: X \rightarrow Y$ are quotient morphisms, i.e. satisfy the following universal property (*)? (*) For any morphism $f:X \rightarrow Z$, ...
Qfwfq's user avatar
  • 23.3k
11 votes
3 answers
2k views

What is the difference between Grothendieck groups K_0(X) vs K^0(X) on schemes?

More specifically, I was wondering if there are well-known conditions to put on $X$ in order to make $K_0(X)\simeq K^0(X)$. Wikipedia says they are the same if $X$ is smooth. It seems to me that you ...
Matt's user avatar
  • 970
28 votes
4 answers
7k views

Extending vector bundles on a given open subscheme

Let $U$ be a dense open subscheme of an integral noetherian scheme $X$ and let $E$ be a vector bundle on $U$. Suppose that the complement $Y$ of $U$ has codimension $\textrm{codim}(Y,X) \geq 2$. Let $...
Ariyan Javanpeykar's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
825 views

When singular points of a reduced scheme are not dense in it?

A stupid AG question: could singular (Zarisky) points be dense in a reduced (Noetherian) scheme $S$? If yes, which 'standard' restrictions on $S$ could ensure that this does not happen? For example, ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
902 views

Given a morphism from X to Y, when is the morphism from O_Y to the pushforward of O_X injective

I would like to know under what condition the morphism $\mathcal{O}_Y\longrightarrow f_\ast \mathcal{O}_X$ induced by a morphism $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ of schemes is injective. Let me give an example ...
Ariyan Javanpeykar's user avatar