Someone recently asked what the epimorphisms in the category of schemes are; the other day I had been wondering about the similar question: what are the monomorphisms in the category of schemes? I am often frustrated working with schemes because, unlike a lot of other categories, it is not immediate that you have left cancellation of morphisms when you know the underlying map on sets is injective--and I think it must not be true in general, though I don't have an example in mind. Are there nice situations or additional conditions that guarantee that one may safely cancel morphisms of schemes on the left?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ One basic example is immersions. $\endgroup$ – Emerton Feb 25 '11 at 3:57

In EGA IV, 17.2.6 the following characterization of monomorphisms is given:

Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism locally of finite type. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

a) $f$ is a monomorphism.

b) $f$ is radicial and formally unramified.

c) For every $y \in Y$, the fiber $f^{-1}(y)$ is either empty or isomorphic to $\text{Spec}(k(y))$.

Also note that (due to the adjunction) a morphism between affine schemes is a monomorphism (in the category of schemes) if and only if the associated homomorphism of rings is an epimorphism (in the category of rings) and the latter ones can be characterized in many ways. See, for example, this Samuel seminar and this MO discussion. Monomorphisms of noetherian schemes are treated in detail in Exposé 7 by Daniel Ferrand.

Further examples:

1) Immersions are monomorphisms; this follows from the universal property of a closed resp. open immersion.

2) A morphism $X \to Y$ is a monomorphism if and only if the diagonal $X \to X \times_Y X$ is an isomorphism. In particular, every monomorphism is separated.

3) In EGA IV, 18.12.6 it is shown that proper monomorphisms are exactly the closed immersions.

  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Nice and complete answer! I particularly like the criterion (2). I add an example parallel to the last one: In EGA IV, 17.9.1 it's proved that the étale monomorphisms are exactly the open immersions. $\endgroup$ – Lorenzo Feb 25 '11 at 8:16
  • $\begingroup$ Let me mention that one can describe $X \times_Y X$ as a locally ringed space explicitly (see arxiv.org/pdf/1103.2139v1.pdf for instance) and this gives a very explicit description of monomorphisms (using the condition that $X \to X \times_Y X$ is an isomorphism). But I haven't seen it in practice so far. $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Jan 17 '16 at 16:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.