Let all schemes below be excellent. Let $X_0$ be a regular (not necessarily smooth, projective) non-empty scheme of finite type over the generic point $\eta$ of a regular connected scheme $S$. As the answers to my question For a morphism f from a regular scheme, should there exist an open subscheme U of the target such that fibre of f at each point of U is regular show, there does not have to exist a dense open $U\subset S$ such that $X_0$ possesses a fibrewise regular model over $U$. Yet, should there always exist a pseudo-finite dominant morphism $j:U\to S$ and some model $X$ of $X_0$ over $S$ such that $U$ is regular and the reduced scheme associated to $X_U$ is smooth over $U$? Can we assume that the morphism $U\to S$ is radiciel?

Upd.: it is probably sufficient for my purposes to find such a $U$ for a variety $X_0$ that is smooth over the perfect closure of $\eta$. It seems that (the first) BCnrd comment solves the problem; thanks!!

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Mikhail, I edited the question (e.g., "generic fiber $S_0$" of $S$ seemed likely to be a generic pt of $S$). The answer to the modified question (which I hope is what you intended) is "yes". By generic flatness can assume $X$ is $S$-flat, and by descent from perfect closure of $k(\eta)$ (over which regular implies smooth) there's a finite purely insep $K/k(\eta)$ such that $((X_0)_K)_ {\rm{red}}$ is $K$-smooth. Spread $K$ to reduced $U$ finite flat radiciel over dense open in $S$. Then $(X_U)_ {\rm{red}}$ is $U$-smooth. Replace $U$ with regular dense open (excellence!), so you win. QED $\endgroup$
    – BCnrd
    Jul 16, 2010 at 16:30
  • $\begingroup$ Whoops!! Mea culpa, the step where I did descent from perfect closure is wrong, since the underlying reduced scheme of the base change to the perfect closure is merely generic smooth, perhaps not smooth if $X_ {\eta}$ wasn't smooth. I'm now a bit doubtful. Is there a reason why alterations aren't enough for your needs? $\endgroup$
    – BCnrd
    Jul 16, 2010 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ @B.: For the conclusion to be true, the reduced geometric generic fiber $((X_0)_{\bar{k(\eta)}})_{\rm red}$ must be smooth. Your proof shows that this condition is sufficient. I think that just assuming $X_0$ regular is not enough (consider the curve $y^2=x^p-a$ with $a$ not a $p$-th power in characteristic $p>0$, it is even geometrically reduced). $\endgroup$
    – Qing Liu
    Jul 16, 2010 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, the condition is not necessary. $\endgroup$
    – Qing Liu
    Jul 16, 2010 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ Alterations seem to require some additional restrictions. I thought that my method (extending regular schemes from the generic point) would work over an arbitrary excellent base. Perhaps, such a generalization is not really interesting. $\endgroup$ Jul 16, 2010 at 17:02

1 Answer 1


To synthersize a bit: let $S$ be an excellent (quasi-excellent is enough) integral scheme, let $X_0$ be a regular scheme of finite type over $K=K(S)$. I will suppose $X_0$ separated to avoid possible pathologies.

  1. There exists a separated integral noetherian scheme $X$ over $S$ with generic fiber isomorphic to $X_0$.

  2. The singular locus of $X$ is closed (excellence), its projection in $S$ is constructible (Chevalley) and does not contain the generic point of $S$, therefore is contained in a proper closed subset $F$ of $S$. The scheme $X_U$, where $U=S \setminus F$, is a regular model of $X_0$ over $U$ (or $S$).

  3. If $(\overline{X_0})_{\rm red}$ is smooth, then, as explained by BCnrd, there exits a radicial finite flat (hence dominant) morphism $U\to S$ with $U$ integral such that $(X_U)_{\rm red}\to U$ is smooth. [Edit] The assumption of smoothness is also necessary if $(X_U)_{\rm red}\to U$ is smooth for some dominant morphism $U\to S$ (just consider the generic fiber).

  4. The above assumption of smoothness is essentially sharp [Edit] if we want to have a quasi-finite (i.e. finite type with finite fibers) and dominant base change $U\to S$ such that $(X_U)_{\rm red}\to U$ is fiberwise regular. Consider the example $S={\rm Spec} (k[t])$ with $k$ perfect of characteristic $p>2$, and let $X_0$ be the regular affine curve over $K=k(t)$ defined by the equation $y^2=x^p-t$. Then $X_0$ is geometrically integral but not smooth over $K$. Let $X\to S$ be a model of $X_0$ (i.e. finite type separated morphism with generic fiber isomorphic to $X_0$). Shrinking $S$ if necessary, we can suppose that $X\to S$ is flat with geometrically integral fibers ([EGA], IV.9 or directly compare with the obvious projective model associated to the equation $y^2=x^p-t$ over $S$) [Edit] and that the Zariski closure in $X$ of the non-smooth point $(y, x^p-t)\in X_0$ meets every fiber. Let $U\to S$ be any quasi-finite dominant morphism $U\to S$ (with $U$ integral). Then $X_U$ is integral. But none of the closed fibers of $X_U\to U$ is regular because it would be smooth (any finite extension of $k$ is perfect) and then $X_0$ would be smooth at $(y, x^p-t)$, contradiction.

  • $\begingroup$ Item 4 concerns with models with regular fibers, which <i>a priori</a> is a weaker condition then smoothness. $\endgroup$
    – Qing Liu
    Jul 17, 2010 at 13:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.