Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with or
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
1 answer
672 views

vanishing theorems

I would be glad to know about possible generalizations of the following results: 1) (Grothendieck) Let $X$ be a noetherian topological space of dimension $n$. Then for all $i>n$ and all sheaves of ...
Agustí Roig's user avatar
  • 1,975
8 votes
2 answers
4k views

Sheaf cohomology question

For a topological space $X$ and a sheaf of abelian groups $F$ on it, sheaf cohomology $H^n(X,F)$ is defined. Singular cohomology of $X$ can be expressed as sheaf cohomology if $X$ is locally ...
Victor L.'s user avatar
  • 221
5 votes
1 answer
631 views

Does the concept of a basis for a topology on a category exist?

If we want to define a sheaf F on a topological space X and we have a basis B for the topology of X, what we can do is to define objects and restrictions for guys in B, check that they satisfy the "B-...
babubba's user avatar
  • 1,993
3 votes
1 answer
587 views

Functoriality of base change

Let $a:W\rightarrow X$, $c:X\rightarrow Z$, $b:W\rightarrow Y$ and $d:Y\rightarrow Z$ be a pull-back diagram in the category of topological spaces. Then one can construct a natural isomorphism $\kappa$...
JJH's user avatar
  • 1,457
5 votes
1 answer
2k views

Natural morphism appearing in Grothendieck spectral sequence

Assume we are in the setting of the Grothendieck spectral sequence (Weibel, 5.8): $G : A \to B, F : B \to C$ are left exact functors such that $G$ sends injective objects to $F$-acyclic objects. Now ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
23 votes
4 answers
5k views

De Rham decomposition theorem, generalisations and good references

De Rham decomposition theorem states that every simply-connected Riemannian manifold $M$ that admits complementary sub-bundles $T'(M)$ and $T''(M)$ of its tangent bundle parallel with respect to the ...
Dmitri Panov's user avatar
  • 28.9k
4 votes
3 answers
6k views

Is Bredon's Topology a sufficient prelude to Bredon's Sheaf Theory?

I intend to try working through Bredon's seminal sheaf theory text prior to graduating (I am currently a second year undergraduate), but it is at a level which is far beyond my own (friends of mine ...
lambdafunctor's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
728 views

Sheaf Cohomology on a Stone Space

Let $X$ be a stone space, i.e. a compact, totally disconnected hausdorff space. Then $H^1(X,\mathbb{Z}/2)=0$. Here's one way of proving this: $X$ with $\mathbb{Z}/2$ (the constant sheaf) is an affine ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
205 views

sheaves on thickened nodal cubics

Suppose F is an algebraically closed field (of any characteristic) and that h in F[x,y,z] is an irreducible cubic form defining a plane curve C with a node. A lot is known about sheaves on C; for ...
paul Monsky's user avatar
  • 5,422
14 votes
1 answer
457 views

References regarding a connection between recursion theory and sheaves

In Manin's A Course in Mathematical Logic for Mathematicians, he defines (p.201) a structure $(\mathcal{E},R)$ given an enumerable set $E \subset (\mathbb{Z}^+)^n$ by: $\mathcal{E}$ is the set of all ...
user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
489 views

Why is continuity required for sheaf-theoretic definitions of a structure on a space

For example, I take differentiability, analyticity, and algebraicity(of a function). All(more or less) imply continuity. So when we define a differentiable function on $\mathbb R^n$ or an analytic ...
Akela's user avatar
  • 3,699
7 votes
0 answers
815 views

A question on a proof that fine sheaves are soft

Let's open R.O.Wells "Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds" p. 53 and have a look at the Proposition 3.5 stating that all fine sheaves are soft (over a paracompact Hausdorff $X$). In the proof ...
Kestutis Cesnavicius's user avatar
6 votes
7 answers
3k views

Are two sheaves that are locally isomorphic globally isomorphic ?

Let $X$ be a topological space and let $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ be two sheaves over $X$. Of course, if one has a morphism $f : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ such that for all $x\in X$, $f_x : \...
user2330's user avatar
  • 1,320
17 votes
2 answers
1k views

What are the merits of the different finiteness conditions on quasi-coherent sheaves?

It's my understanding that there's no disagreement about the right way to define a quasi-coherence for a sheaf $F$ of $O_X$-algebras (over a scheme, locally ringed space, or even locally ringed topos)....
JBorger's user avatar
  • 9,408
11 votes
5 answers
8k views

When is the push-forward of the structure sheaf locally free

Let $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ be a morphism of noetherian schemes. Under what conditions is $f_\ast \mathcal{O}_X$ a locally free $\mathcal{O}_Y$-module? Example 1. Suppose that $f$ is affine. Then $f_\...
Ariyan Javanpeykar's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
5k views

Wikipedia's definition of constant sheaf is wrong [closed]

According to wikipedia (constant sheaf) the constant sheaf $\underline{S}$ for an object $S$ is given by defining $\underline{S}(U)$ to be the set of functions $U \to S$, which are constant on each ...
4 votes
1 answer
639 views

Morphisms between pure complexes of sheaves

I would like to understand the theory of pure complexes of (etale?) sheaves (of geometric origin?). In particular, I would like to understand which conditions are realy necessary in (part 1 of) ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
4k views

Closed subschemes and pulling back the structure sheaf via the inclusion map

I would just like a clarification related to closed subschemes. If $(X,{\cal O}_X)$ is a locally ringed space and $A\subset X$ is any subset with the subspace topology then $i^{-1}{\cal O}_X$ will be ...
Beren Sanders's user avatar
36 votes
6 answers
9k views

What is the Zariski topology good/bad for?

In a comment to this question the quotation "The Zariski Topology is the 'Wrong' topology for Algebraic Geometry" appears. Well, so some spontaneous questions arise: 1) What is Zariski topology ...
5 votes
1 answer
3k views

Question about hypercohomology / spectral sequence of a complex of "almost-acyclic" sheaves

I have a very particular situation involving a (non-exact) complex $K$ of coherent sheaves on a nonsingular projective variety $X$, and I need to compute the hypercohomology of the complex. The ...
user5395's user avatar
  • 545
6 votes
0 answers
2k views

group cohomology and cohomology of classifying space [closed]

Let $G$ be a discrete group, and $BG$ is the classifying space. It is well-known that the group cohomology of $G$-module M, is the same as the cohomology on $BG$ with coefficient in $\tilde{M}$, which ...
JJH's user avatar
  • 1,457
9 votes
1 answer
3k views

Motivation for equivariant sheaves?

Hello everyone; i'm looking for a motivation for equivariant sheaves (see http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/equivariant+sheaf) ~ Why are we interested in them? More explicitely: Can I think of G-...
Gerrit Begher's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
987 views

The equivalence of category of equivariant sheaves on principal bundle and category of sheaves on base space

Let $\pi:P\to B$ is a $G$-principal bundle, which means $G$ acts on $P$ freely and $\pi$ is a locally trivial fibration. Here is a well-known theorem: THeorem: The inverse image functor $\pi^{*}$ ...
JJH's user avatar
  • 1,457
8 votes
1 answer
562 views

Category of copresheaves over commutative monoids

Let C be a symmetric monoidal category. Let Comm(C) be the category of commutative monoids in C. Consider the topos X = CoPSh(Comm(C)) of covariant functors from Comm(C) to the category Set of sets. ...
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
383 views

How to characterize Abelian sheaves that are quasi-coherent?

Let $X$ be a scheme. Suppose you are given a sheaf of Abelian groups $\mathcal{A}$ over $X$. How can you determine if $\mathcal{A}$ is the underlying Abelian sheaf of a sheaf of $O_X$-modules? In ...
Qfwfq's user avatar
  • 23.3k
4 votes
1 answer
549 views

Does this condition reduce to the correct notion of irreducibility on schemes?

Consider the category of sheaves (of sets) on the affine étale site. It's a well known fact that a morphism of schemes is a Zariski-open immersion if and only if it is an étale monomorphism, so we ...
Harry Gindi's user avatar
  • 19.6k
5 votes
2 answers
830 views

Closed monoidal structure on the derived category of sheaves

Given a topological space X, i'd like to find Der X - the derived category of sheaves of abelian groups on X - to be a closed monoidal category. Hom should be cohomological and the internal-hom should ...
Gerrit Begher's user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
3k views

Internal hom of sheaves

Consider a topos, i.e. the category $Shv$ of sheaves on a Grothendieck site $T$ with values in abelian groups. The category $Shv$ is symmetric monoidal with $\otimes$, the tensor product in every ...
roger123's user avatar
  • 2,782
3 votes
1 answer
583 views

Simplifying the definition of a geometric context using sieves?

On Pages 1-3 of Cours 2 of Toën's Master Course on Stacks, he defines the notion of a Geometric context with a rather extensive list of axioms (they take up about two pages over and above the ...
Harry Gindi's user avatar
  • 19.6k
21 votes
3 answers
2k views

Is there a "categorical" description of Grothendieck's algebra of differential operators?

First, pick a commutative ring $k$ as the "ground field". Everything I say will be $k$-linear, e.g. "algebra" means "unital associative algebra over $k$". Then recall the following construction due ...
Theo Johnson-Freyd's user avatar
54 votes
3 answers
11k views

Sheaves and bundles in differential geometry

Because the theory of sheaves is a functorial theory, it has been adopted in algebraic geometry (both using the functor of points approach and the locally ringed space approach) as the "main theory" ...
Harry Gindi's user avatar
  • 19.6k
9 votes
2 answers
1k views

Is there a description of sheaf cohomology in algebraic-topological terms?

Is there a description of of sheaf cohomology for the sheaf of sections of a continuous function in terms of common constructions in Algebraic Topology? In more detail: Any sheaf on a space X can be ...
Omar Antolín-Camarena's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
2k views

Cohomology with compact support for coherent sheaves on a scheme

Is there a notion (for schemes or just locally ringed spaces) of cohomology with compact support? I guess there is for algebraic schemes over $\mathbf{C}$, but what about schemes in general? Does ...
Amira's user avatar
  • 163
0 votes
1 answer
346 views

O_X module with support Z \subset X vs O_S module?

Given a $O_X$ module $\cal F$ whose support is a closed subscheme $Z \subset X$. Under what conditions can we say that $ \cal F$ is an $O_S$ module ( how far off is $\cal F$ an $O_S$ module ? )
John Doe's user avatar
  • 238
10 votes
3 answers
825 views

Sheaves as full reflective subcategories

Hello everyone. My question is concerned with the following statement. "Having a grothendieck topology on a category C is equivalent to having a full reflective subcategory Sh(C) in the category PSh(...
Gerrit Begher's user avatar
18 votes
4 answers
1k views

Cohomology of a sheaf of functions locally constant along a foliation

Take a smooth manifold $M^n$ with a smooth foliation $F$. Consider the sheaf $\cal F$ of $C^{\infty}$ functions on $M^n$, locally constant along the foliation $F$. What is known about Chech cohomology ...
Dmitri Panov's user avatar
  • 28.9k
25 votes
3 answers
5k views

Stacks and sheaves

I'm a bit confused by the double role which sheaves play in the theory of stacks. On the one hand, sheaves on a site are the obvious generalization of a sheaf on a topological space. On the other ...
Andrea Ferretti's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
723 views

Sheaf condition and representability in the category Top

This is a rather nice question I got from this user via private communication. Let $\mathcal{C} = Top$ the category of topological spaces. Let $\mathcal{C}^\prime$ be the category $Funct(\mathcal{C}^{...
Anweshi's user avatar
  • 7,442
9 votes
4 answers
3k views

Relative version of sheaf cohomology?

Is there a relative version of sheaf cohomology? EDIT: I rather mean the cohomology of pairs.
Rootof's user avatar
  • 93
26 votes
2 answers
2k views

Loop Spaces as Generalized Smooth spaces or as Infinite dimensional Manifolds?

There are two ways to define smooth mapping spaces and I want to know how they compare. Let's take the concrete special case of free loops spaces. I think this is the most studied example so will ...
Chris Schommer-Pries's user avatar
6 votes
3 answers
1k views

Definition of sheaves in wikipedia

In wikipedia, sheaves were first defined in the case of concrete categories (with usual identity and gluing axioms), then in the general case. (writing it as an "exact" sequence) Do these two ...
user avatar
36 votes
3 answers
4k views

What is the right version of "partitions of unity implies vanishing sheaf cohomology"

There are several theorems I know of the form "Let $X$ be a locally ringed space obeying some condition like existence of partitions of unity. Let $E$ be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$ modules obeying ...
David E Speyer's user avatar
20 votes
5 answers
2k views

Equivalence of ordered and unordered cech cohomology.

Given a topological space X and a finite cover X = $\cup X_i$, one can define Cech cohomology of a sheaf of abelian groups F with respect to the cover $\{X_i\}$ in two different ways: (Ordered): ...
David Zureick-Brown's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
786 views

Sites which are stacks over themselves

A site C with pullbacks is subcanonical (all representable presheaves are sheaves) if and only if its codomain fibration $Arr(C) \to C$ is a prestack (all hom-presheaves are sheaves). Is there a ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.8k
7 votes
2 answers
458 views

A technical question about derivations of sheaves on group schemes

Let $G$ be a group scheme (for instance, over $k$ a field of characteristic 0). Let $e$ be its unit. I denote by $O_G$ the structural sheaf of $G$. Let $D_e : O_{G,e} \to k$ a derivation. I would ...
user2330's user avatar
  • 1,320
3 votes
3 answers
687 views

Nature of Invertible Sheaves in which there are no global sections.

EDIT: Let me try to make the question clearer. Consider the invertible sheaves $\mathcal{O}(d)$ over the projective space $\mathbb{P}^n$ where $d\in \mathbb{Z}$. Now, if $d>0$, among many ...
Csar Lozano Huerta's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

Encoding fuzzy logic with the topos of set-valued sheaves

One of the canonical examples used by Barr & Wells in order to motivate the use of topoi is that we can construct a theory for fuzzy logic and fuzzy set theory as set-valued sheaves on a poset (...
Mikael Vejdemo-Johansson's user avatar
11 votes
2 answers
878 views

Does sheafification preserve sheaves for a different topology?

Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be two Grothendieck topologies on the same small category $C$, and let $T_3 = T_1 \cup T_2$ (by which I mean the smallest Grothendieck topology on $C$ containing $T_1$ and $T_2$). ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.8k
24 votes
4 answers
6k views

What is a section?

This question comes out of the answers to Ho Chung Siu's question about vector bundles. Based on my reading, it seems that the definition of the term "section" went through several phases of ...
Qiaochu Yuan's user avatar
35 votes
5 answers
4k views

Heuristic explanation of why we lose projectives in sheaves.

We know that presheaves of any category have enough projectives and that sheaves do not, why is this, and how does it effect our thinking? This question was asked(and I found it very helpful) but I ...
B. Bischof's user avatar
  • 4,842