Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
13 votes
2 answers
660 views

Categories in which isomorphism of stalks does not imply isomorphism of sheaves

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a locally small category with colimits of small filtered diagrams. For the purposes of this question, an $\mathcal{A}$-presheaf on a topological space $X$ is a functor $\Omega (X)^...
Zhen Lin's user avatar
  • 15.9k
11 votes
1 answer
390 views

Giraud's axioms imply balanced

I'm stuck on the following. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a category satisfying the Giraud axioms: namely $\mathcal{E}$ is locally presentable, has universal colimits, has disjoint coproducts, and has ...
Emilio Minichiello's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
290 views

Day Convolution of Sheaves

In Bodil Biering's master's thesis, Conjecture 4.3.3 conjectures that Day convolution of presheaves does not generally preserve sheaf conditions, with an incomplete attempt at a counter-example given. ...
Max New's user avatar
  • 989
4 votes
1 answer
371 views

Grothendieck topoi as a constructive property

This question is inspired by Homotopy type theory, but I believe it can be thought about also in other constructive foundations. In HoTT the question could be stated as follows: Given a definition of ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 1,347
3 votes
0 answers
199 views

When a fully faithful functor from an abelian category to itself will be an equivalence

Let $A$ be an abelian category. Suppose $i:A\to A$ is a fully faithful functor from $A$ to itself. I wonder when the functor will be an equivalence. If $A$ is a "nice" category, I think $i$ ...
Mike's user avatar
  • 253
1 vote
1 answer
122 views

System of local isos gives system of local epis

Suppose that $W$ is a system of local isomorphisms on a presheaf topos $\mathbf{Pre}(\mathcal{C})$. We say a map in $W$ is a $W$-local isomorphism, and we say that a map of presheaves $f: X \to Y$ is ...
Emilio Minichiello's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
103 views

Is the derived category of sheaves localised at pointwise homotopy equivalences locally small?

In order to define the cup and cross products in sheaf cohomology, Iversen makes computations in an intermediate derived category. If $K(X;k)$ is the triangulated category of cochain complexes of ...
FShrike's user avatar
  • 1,021
7 votes
1 answer
205 views

Variation on definition of logical functors avoiding power objects

Without power sets in meta-theory not every Grothendieck topos is an elementary topos, Set is still Grothendieck, but it lacks power objects. Now I am looking for a definition of a logical functor ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 1,347
5 votes
1 answer
411 views

Day convolution and sheafification

$\DeclareMathOperator\Psh{Psh}\DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh}\newcommand\copower{\mathrm{copower}}$I was looking through Bodil Biering's thesis On the Logic of Bunched Implications - and its relation to ...
Anthony D'Arienzo's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
100 views

Site structure on smooth fibered manifolds

Let $\mathsf{FB}_{s}$ be the category whose objects are smooth fibered manifolds, and whose morphisms are smooth strong projectable maps. Recall that given fibered manifolds $(\pi:Y\rightarrow X)$ and ...
Bence Racskó's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
163 views

Why equaliser of product and terminal object is coproduct?

I’m reading “Sheaves in geometry and logic”, in page 80: Please refer to [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/INrU0.jpg It says “…,therefore $FU=\coprod_{x\in U} fx$. The space…”. So could anyone please explain ...
Bonan Su's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
94 views

Are the injections of a coproduct a cover in the canonical pretopology?

Assume we're in a category $C$ with all pullbacks and finite coproducts. Recall that the canonical coverage of $C$ is the finest Grothendieck (pre) topology for which all representables are sheaves. A ...
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
395 views

Relationship between canonical topology on a topos and its site of definition

The canonical (Grothendieck) topology for a category $C$ is the largest (finest) topology such that every representable presheaf over $C$ is a sheaf. According to First Order Categorical Logic Lemma 1....
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
245 views

Compatibility of Beck Chevalley condition: sheaves

Given a (not necessarily Cartesian) square of spaces $$\require{AMScd}\begin{CD} X @>g>> \overline{X} \\ @VVfV @VV\overline{f}V \\ Y @>\overline{g}>> \overline{Y} \end{CD}$$ does the ...
Pulcinella's user avatar
  • 5,701
3 votes
0 answers
215 views

How to read the definition of Grothendieck Pretopology in SGA4?

In SGA4, the first axiom of a Grothendieck pretopology is given as: PT0: Pour tout objet $X$ de $C$, les morphismes des familles de morphismes de $Cov(𝑋)$ sont quarrables. (Rappelons qu’un morphisme ...
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
7 votes
3 answers
924 views

not quite the sheaf condition

Let $Sets$ be the category of finite sets and all maps. I have come accross several example of functors $F : Sets^{op} \to Sets$ which satisfy the condition below: -- There exists an integer $k$ such ...
Pierre's user avatar
  • 2,287
2 votes
1 answer
193 views

Unifying categorical equivalences and dualities for the functors : Gelfand spectrum and Zariski spectrum, Structural sheaf and Continuous sections

I would be very grateful for any references I might be led to, from a categorical point of view for the functors: $\textsf{Spec}_{\mathscr{Z}\textrm{arisky}}(-)$, related to $\mathcal{O}(-)$, which ...
Julien Dalpayrat-Glutron's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
255 views

Subobject classifier for sheaves on large sites with WISC

Let $\mathsf{C}$ be a possibly large category with a Grothendieck topology satisfying the Weakly Initial Set of Covers condition: there is for each $X$ a set (not a proper class) of covering families ...
Robbie Lyman's user avatar
  • 1,996
1 vote
0 answers
79 views

What is $\text{Hom}(\mathcal{F}\times\mathcal{G}, \mathbb{A}^1)$?

Let $S$ be an affine scheme and let $\text{Aff}(S)$ be the site of affine $S$-schemes. Let $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ be a pair of sheaves on $\text{Aff}(S)$, and let $\mathbb{A}^1_S$ be the ...
kindasorta's user avatar
  • 2,907
4 votes
3 answers
483 views

"Quasi-coherent" vector spaces in Sch/S

$\DeclareMathOperator\Vec{Vec}\newcommand\Sch{\mathrm{Sch}}\DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom}$Let $S$ be a base scheme. Let me write $\Vec(S)$ to denote the category of $\mathbb A_S$-vector space objects ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 775
3 votes
0 answers
186 views

The site and the space

There is a (seemingly simple) statement in the literature on sheaf theory, namely, If $E$ is the site of opens of a topological space $X$, the notion of sheaf over $X$ coincides with that of sheaf of ...
user234212323's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
533 views

Isbell duality between algebras and sheaves

nLab says on Isbell duality, the following: A general abstract adjunction $(\mathcal{O} \dashv \operatorname{Spec}) : \mathrm{CoPresheaves} \leftrightarrows \mathrm{Presheaves}$ relates (higher) ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 1,347
6 votes
1 answer
455 views

Subsheaves of Spec K, K a field

$\DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec}\newcommand\Ring{\mathrm{Ring}}\newcommand\op{^\text{op}}\DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom}\DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh}$In the category of schemes the objects of the form $\...
Nico's user avatar
  • 775
0 votes
1 answer
177 views

Does the (Vistoli-)sheafification induce isomorphism?

Given a presheaf, in Angelo Vistoli's 2007 Notes on Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory there is a construction of the sheafification (Proof for theorem 2.64). Note: In ...
Muster Maxfrau's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
172 views

Is the Grothendieck topology equivalent to its Singleton Grothendieck topology?

I'm using the definition of a Grothendieck topology in Angelo Vistoli’s 2007 Notes on Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory and I found on nLab about superextensive site, that ...
Muster Maxfrau's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
106 views

Joins of (closed) subschemes and Zariski-local Z-functors

$\newcommand\Aff{\mathrm{Aff}}\newcommand\cRing{\mathrm{cRing}}\newcommand\Sch{\mathrm{Sch}}$Equip $\Aff = \cRing^\text{op}$ with the Zariski Grothendieck-topology. There are nested categories: $$\Aff\...
Nico's user avatar
  • 775
1 vote
1 answer
213 views

Concrete sheaves

On the nLab, given a local $S$-topos $E$, a concrete sheaf is defined as an object that is separated with respect to the local isomorphisms (the morphisms that are inverted by the global sections ...
NDewolf's user avatar
  • 193
3 votes
0 answers
142 views

Johnstone's Elephant - Lemma C2.1.7 confusion

I don't understand the proof of (ii) in the Johnstone's Elephant: Lemma 2.1.6 is: Now consider $\bigcup_{f \in R} f \circ f^*(S)$. This is my notation for the sieve Johnstone references in the proof ...
Emilio Minichiello's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
448 views

Zorn's lemma for Grothendieck sites

In every treatment of Grothendieck sites I can find, flasque sheaves are not defined in the way one would naïvely expect from ordinary sheaf cohomology; namely instead of saying that "restriction ...
cat man's user avatar
  • 163
19 votes
2 answers
393 views

Why is $1$ not a dense sub-site in a group with the trivial Grothendieck topology?

A friend of mine had the following question while reading the section "C2.2 The topos of sheaves" in "Sketches of an Elephant". Let $G$ be a group (considered as a category with ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
513 views

Proof without sieves: Equivalent grothendieck topologies have the same sheaves

I'm currently learning about sheaf theory with Angelo Vistoli’s 2007 Notes on Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory. And in page 35, there is the following definition of a ...
Muster Maxfrau's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
226 views

Is the right adjoint to presheaf direct image interesting?

Let $X\overset{f}{\to}Y$ be a continuous map. It induces on presheaves a classical adjunction inverse image ⊣ direct image. However, the direct image functor has a further right adjoint, defined by ...
Arrow's user avatar
  • 10.5k
3 votes
1 answer
244 views

Compatibility of pullbacks with an equivalence relation

This question was originally posted last week in Math Stack Exchange (see here). I'm currently working on the proof of the existence of the sheafification in Angelo Vistoli’s 2007 Notes on ...
Muster Maxfrau's user avatar
17 votes
1 answer
442 views

Examples of statements that are valid in every spatial topos

I am looking for statements¹ that, when interpreted in the internal language of a topos, are valid in all spatial toposes (i.e., the topos of sheaves of any topological space) that are not valid in ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k
15 votes
2 answers
616 views

Is it true that $\operatorname{2-colim}_U \textsf{QCoh}(U) = \textsf{Vect}(K_X)$, as $U$ shrinks to the generic point?

Let $X$ be an integral scheme with function field $K$. If $U\subset X$ is an open subscheme, we may consider the restriction functor $$\textsf{QCoh}(X) \to \textsf{QCoh}(U).$$ I don't know much about ...
Gabriel's user avatar
  • 711
7 votes
1 answer
353 views

Does the category of cosheaves have enough projectives?

Given a general topological space $X$ does the category $\mathbf{coShv}(X,\mathbf{Mod}_R)$ have enough projectives ? I know that under some conditions this is true, for example if $X$ is a cell ...
Hyperion's user avatar
  • 173
2 votes
0 answers
136 views

Homotopy fixed points vs coalgebras

Referring to the last part of this answer https://mathoverflow.net/a/225403/170683, I would like to understand how in the case of a Galois cover $f\colon X\to Y=X/G$ with Galois group $G$ (I guess ...
Nikio's user avatar
  • 351
9 votes
2 answers
377 views

Cartesian-closed full subcategory of locally ringed spaces containing smooth manifolds

This coming fall, I will be teaching a course on differential topology to a small group of strong students. In preparation for it, I'm trying to find a category $\mathrm{GDiff}$ with the following ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
465 views

When is a basis of a topological space a Grothendieck pretopology?

Bases of a topological space in point set topology will in general form a coverage on its category of inclusion on open subsets and on its category of inclusion on basic opens, but it takes a bit more ...
saolof's user avatar
  • 1,947
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

What's the point of a point-free locale?

In [1, example C.1.2.8], a locale $Y$ (dense in another locale $X$) without any point is given. I fail to understand the point of such point-less locale - Why can't we identify those as the trivial ...
Student's user avatar
  • 5,230
11 votes
2 answers
1k views

Is there a relation between Gelfand duality and the spectrum of a ring (with its Zariski topology)?

Compare the following two results: Thm A) Let $A$ be a commutative $C^*$-algebra and let $X$ be its Gelfand spectrum. Gelfand duality says that there's a natural isometric $*$-isomorphism from $A$ to ...
Gabriel's user avatar
  • 711
5 votes
0 answers
290 views

About the left adjoint of $f^*$

In lots of different cases (Verdier duality, Grothendieck duality, étale cohomology, ...) the very existence of a (right) adjoint to the sheaf functor $f_!$ gives useful information. (I'm going to ...
Gabriel's user avatar
  • 711
7 votes
1 answer
291 views

Direct and inverse image terminology

Let $f\colon X\to Y$ be a continuous map. Then $f$ induces a geometric morphism $f^\ast\dashv f_\ast\colon \mathrm{Sh}(X)\leftrightarrows\mathrm{Sh}(Y)$, whose left adjoint is called inverse image and ...
user1005113's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
1k views

Are groups determined by their morphisms from solvable groups?

$\newcommand{\Grp}{\mathrm{Grp}}$Consider the category of groups $\Grp$, and within it we have the solvable groups $S$. Then any group $G$ determines the functor from solvable groups: $$h_G:=\text{hom}...
Chris H's user avatar
  • 1,949
1 vote
0 answers
106 views

Invariance of categories of sheaves (on simplicial presheaves) under (local) weak equivalence

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a Grothendieck site (secretly in my head I am thinking of Hausdorff topological spaces with open covers; if I am daring I might be thinking of the big etale site on complex ...
rvk's user avatar
  • 563
1 vote
0 answers
123 views

Motivic homotopy categories closed under subobjects and quotients

It is well known that the category $\mathbf{HI}_{\rm Nis}^{\rm tr}(k)$ of $\mathbb{A}^1$-local Nisnevich sheaves with transfers is closed under subobjects and quotients, from the highly nontrivial ...
user197402's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
115 views

About condition for structure sheaf of a scheme being compact object in a category of sheaf of module over X [duplicate]

I found the condition for one direction : Categorical interpretation of quasi-compact quasi-separated schemes This article said that if $X$ is quasi compact and quasi separated, $\mathscr{O}_X$ is a ...
Doyoung Choi's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
361 views

How to model (affine) schemes with a large sketch?

Guitart states in "Toute theorie est algebrique et topologique" as Proposition 17 that the category $\mathbf{Sch}$ of schemes is the category of models of a large mixed sketch. Presumably, ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
225 views

Sheaves on sites given by a (regular) cd-structure

Let $C$ be a category equipped with a Grothendieck topology generated by a cd-structure (see https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/cd-structure or Voevodsky's paper Homotopy theory of simplicial presheaves in ...
Josefien K's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
293 views

Functorial isomorphisms

$\DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom}\DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh}\DeclareMathOperator\PSh{PSh}$We know that a presheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on category $ \mathcal{C} $ gives a colimit preasheaf $ \mathcal{F}^{+} $ ...
BouaichiAnas's user avatar