Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
62 votes
8 answers
14k views

Sheaf cohomology and injective resolutions

In defining sheaf cohomology (say in Hartshorne), a common approach seems to be defining the cohomology functors as derived functors. Is there any conceptual reason for injective resolution to come ...
user avatar
26 votes
1 answer
4k views

When (or why) is a six-functor formalism enough?

The six functor formalism in a given cohomology theory consists of for each space a derived category of sheaves and six different ways to construct functors between those categories (four involving a ...
Will Sawin's user avatar
  • 149k
21 votes
2 answers
1k views

Cohomologically trivial stacks

The following theorem of Serre is well-known: A noetherian scheme $X$ is affine if and only if $H^i(X; \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for all quasi-coherent sheaves $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ and all $i>0$. (...
Lennart Meier's user avatar
19 votes
3 answers
2k views

Classification of rings satisfying $a^4=a$

We have the famous classification of rings satisfying $a^2=a$ (for each element $a$) in terms of Stone spaces, via $X \mapsto C(X,\mathbb{F}_2)$. Similarly, rings satisfying $a^3=a$ are classified by ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
1k views

Does every sheaf embed into a quasicoherent sheaf?

Question. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. Is there always a quasicoherent sheaf $\mathcal{E}'$ together with a monomorphism $\mathcal{E} \to \mathcal{E}'$?...
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
2k views

Where am I suppose to actually learn how to compute hypercohomology?

I'm reading about algebraic de Rham cohomology over characteristic zero which is constructed using hypercohomology. Already, constructing injective resolutions is difficult, and coupling this with ...
54321user's user avatar
  • 1,716
16 votes
1 answer
448 views

Zorn's lemma for Grothendieck sites

In every treatment of Grothendieck sites I can find, flasque sheaves are not defined in the way one would naïvely expect from ordinary sheaf cohomology; namely instead of saying that "restriction ...
cat man's user avatar
  • 163
15 votes
5 answers
6k views

Non-cohomological proof that the pullback of an ample bundle by a finite morphism is ample

It is a standard fact that for any finite morphism of proper Noetherian $A$-schemes ($A$ being Noetherian), the pullback of an ample line bundle is ample. The usual proof of this fact is via Serre's ...
Charles Staats's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
6k views

When does sheaf cohomology commute with arbitrary direct sums?

It is well known and more or less proven in Hartshorne's 'Algebraic Geometry' (p. 209) that for every noetherian scheme $X$ and every collection of abelian sheaves $\mathcal{F}_i$ the canonical map $$...
Lennart Meier's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
1k views

Etale homology via étale cosheaves

Can one develop a theory of étale homology via étale cosheaves? The hope is that this would, for example, return the Tate module (and not its dual) for an elliptic curve, and it would return group ...
David Corwin's user avatar
  • 15.4k
12 votes
1 answer
860 views

Algebraic groups without torsors

If $G$ is an algebraic group such that $H^1(S, G) = 0$ for all schemes $S$, must $G$ be the trivial group? My original motivation for the question is the rationale I always give students for studying ...
Jonathan Wise's user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
2k views

difference between the small and big étale/flat/... site

What is the difference between the small and the big étale (or flat or syntomic or ...) site? How does the cohomology vary? When should I use which one? Up to now, I have always used the small sites.
user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
557 views

Hodge to de Rham spectal sequence with twisted coefficients

Let $M$ be a smooth compact Kahler manifold and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a local system on $M$. Question 1: I assume that there exists a twisted Hodge to de Rham spectral sequence converging to $H^{p+q}(...
Lisa's user avatar
  • 321
10 votes
4 answers
3k views

Cohomology of line bundles

For sure answers to my questions are well known - but I never saw them anywhere. Let $X$ be a smooth projective (or just proper) variety over an algebraically closed field $k$. Let $A_i$ be the ...
Piotr Achinger's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
963 views

intuition about perverse sheaves

firstly, I would know if my very basic intuition on perverse sheaves is correct . secondly, I would have some clarification in what perverse sheaves behaves better than regular sheaves . my intuition ...
Amos Kaminski's user avatar
9 votes
4 answers
3k views

Is there a (satisfying) proof that cellular cohomology is isomorphic to simplicial cohomology that doesn't use relative cohomlogy?

That singular and de Rham cohomologies of a smooth manifold are isomorphic has two proofs that I know of. The classical one uses Stokes' theorem to give the isomorphism explicitly. The second proof ...
Makhalan Duff's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
1k views

Do the cohomology groups of the structure sheaf of a smooth resolution depend on the resolution?

Let $X$ be an affine variety. Let $Y$ be smooth and let the map $f\colon Y\rightarrow X$ be proper birational. We will call $Y$ a smooth resolution of $X$. Do the cohomology groups $H^i(Y,\mathcal{O}...
clementine's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
509 views

Deducing properness from $H^i(X, \mathcal{F})$ finitely generated over $\Gamma(O_X)$

Suppose that $X$ is a quasi-projective variety over a field $k$ and that we further know that for every coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$, $H^i(X,\mathcal{F})$ is finitely generated over $\Gamma(O_X)$. Is ...
Daniel Pomerleano's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
684 views

Is $H^i(X,F)$ finitely generated over $\Gamma(O_X)$ if $F$ is coherent?

Suppose $\mathcal{X}$ is a smooth quasi-projective variety over $\mathbb{C}$ (I apologize if these hypotheses have little to do with the question at hand). Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $\...
Daniel Pomerleano's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
2k views

Cohomology of Grothendieck topology

My naïve cartoon picture of the construction of étale cohomology is this: start with a scheme, associate to it a Grothendieck topology (making a site). A functor from the Grothendieck topology to ...
Stefan Witzel's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
623 views

Can one determine the trace map for a nonsingular projective variety explicitly?

I've never understood how one would actually go about computing a trace map associated with the canonical sheaf on a smooth projective variety, if it's even possible. Hartshorne proves that the ...
forget this's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

What are the uses of coefficient systems for arithmetic cohomology theories?

In topology when studying a space with non-trivial fundamental group it becomes important to consider homology and cohomology with coefficients in representations of the fundamental group, i.e. local ...
user50948's user avatar
  • 183
8 votes
1 answer
506 views

Does the sheaf $\mathcal{O}^*$ on a complex manifold have an acyclic cover?

Let $X$ be a complex manifold and let $\mathcal{O}^*$ be the sheaf nonvanishing holomorphic functions on it. Does it have an acyclic cover? That is, a cover for which all open sets and all ...
Josh Lackman's user avatar
  • 1,198
8 votes
1 answer
394 views

Independence of embedding for higher sheaf cohomology of local cohomology on projective space

Suppose $Y$ is a projective variety over a field $k$. Fix an embedding $\iota: Y \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}^n_k$ for some $n$, and consider the local cohomology sheaves $\mathcal{H}^j_Y(\omega_{\...
Nick Switala's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
646 views

Trying to understand "Shtukas"

I'm studying Goss' Basic structures of function field Arithmetic, chapter 6 about Shtukas. I'm trying to understand some details about some concepts. This chapter is based on a Mumford's paper An ...
MChocko's user avatar
  • 69
8 votes
0 answers
257 views

Global functions on a product of schemes over artinian ring

For a morphism of schemes $f:X\to S$ with $S=\text{Spec}(R)$ affine, let's write $A(X)=H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$. I'm interested in the morphism of $R$-algebras $$ c:A(X)\otimes_R A(Y)\to A(X\times_SY) $$ ...
Matthieu Romagny's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

Are injective quasi-coherent modules acyclic?

Let $X$ be a scheme and $F$ be an injective object of $\mathrm{Qcoh}(X)$. Is it true that $F$ is acyclic with respect to the usual sheaf cohomology? For noetherian schemes $X$ this is well-known; ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
559 views

Local cohomology groups and linearity

I am reading local cohomology and am confused on a silly point. Let $U$ be an affine, non-singular variety and $Z \subset U$ a hypersurface section on $U$ (i.e., complete intersection in $U$ of ...
user45397's user avatar
  • 2,323
7 votes
1 answer
334 views

Extending $G$-torsors on open subsets of affine space

Let $k$ be a characteristic zero field, $V \subset \mathbb{A}^n_k$ an open subscheme, $G$ a split reductive group over $k$ and $T$ a $G$-torsor over $V$ (in the etale, equivalently fppf topology). ...
Jef's user avatar
  • 984
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

Basic properties of Nisnevich cohomology; $l'$-topology?

I would like to know more about Nisnevich cohomology (especially, on its properties that could be easily formulated). In particular, I would like to know which of the following statements are true, ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
574 views

What is the geometric intuition for the sheaf-theoretic terms "soft", "fine", and "flabby"?

The sheaf-theoretic terms "soft", "flabby", and "fine" are of an obviously geometric character, and suggest opposition with "hard", "rigid", and "coarse" sheaves (I'm just inventing these terms here). ...
ಠ_ಠ's user avatar
  • 6,025
6 votes
1 answer
1k views

Poincare duality on the level of complexes

The classical Poincare duality is formulated in terms of cohomology groups. I am wondering if we can also formulate it in terms of complexes. In particular, suppose $\mathcal{C}^*$ is a complex of $...
yue he's user avatar
  • 69
6 votes
2 answers
789 views

Reference request: Kleiman's proof of Snapper's Lemma

On page 4 of Nitin Nitsure's paper Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, the author refers to the fact that Hilbert polynomials are indeed polynomials as a special case of Snapper's Lemma, see &...
The Thin Whistler's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
385 views

cohomology and $j_!$

I have a projective variety $X$ and an open immersion $j : U \to X$. Say I have a sheaf, locally free in my case of interest, $\mathcal{S}$ on $U$. Is there any reasonable relationship between $H^i(X,...
Andy B's user avatar
  • 758
6 votes
2 answers
524 views

Global sections of multiples of a divisor

Let $D$ be an integral divisor on a smooth projective variety $X$. Consider the multiples $mD$ of $D$ for $m\geq 0$. Clearly, $h^0(X,mD) = 1$ for $m = 0$. Is there any example where $h^0(X,mD) = 0$ ...
Puzzled's user avatar
  • 8,998
6 votes
2 answers
632 views

Geometric meaning of coherent sheaves $\mathcal{F} \otimes \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^n}(d)$ over $\mathbb{P}^n$

Maybe it sounds like a silly question but I'm not able to figure out in my head the geometric meaning of "twisting" vector bundles (or more generaly coherent sheaf) over $\mathbb{P}^n$. I ...
gigi's user avatar
  • 1,343
6 votes
1 answer
443 views

Where can I find a definition of $\underline{H}^p(X, \mathscr{F})$?

Let $X$ be a topological space and $\mathscr{F}$ a sheaf on $X$. In the paper Tropical cycle classes for non-archimedean spaces and weight decomposition of de Rham cohomology sheaves by Yifeng Liu, ...
Jakob Werner's user avatar
  • 1,153
6 votes
1 answer
753 views

Sections of the conormal bundle

Let $X\subset\mathbb{P}^N$ be a quadratic manifold. That is $I(X)$ is generated by quadratic polynomials $Q_1,...,Q_m$. Let $\mathcal{I}_X$ be the ideal sheaf of $X$ and $\mathcal{I}_X/\mathcal{I}_X^...
user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
557 views

Cohomology and base change without Noetherian assumption

In the "The Rising Sea" by Vakil one can find the base change theorem for proper morphisms over a locally Noetherian base (28.1.6). He later indicates (28.2.M) how one could exchange the ...
Fabian Ruoff's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
728 views

Sheaf cohomology with support vanishes

I am trying to solve the exercise 2.4 chapter III in Hartshorne's "Algebraic Geometry". For this I would like to prove for a sheaf $F$ of Abelian groups on a topological space $X$ and $U$ open subset ...
Lilolance's user avatar
  • 233
6 votes
1 answer
478 views

A mysterious quasi-isomorphism in Kashiwara-Schapira's proof of HKR

On p. 127 of Kashiwara-Schapira's paper "Deformation Quantization Modules", there is the following situation: $X$ is a smooth complex (quasi?)projective variety and $\delta\colon X\to X\times X$ is ...
A Rock and a Hard Place's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
512 views

infinite grassmannian in algebraic geometry

Geometric realization of $B{\mathbb G}_{\mathfrak m}({\mathbb C})$ is ${\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}^\infty=\varinjlim_n~ {\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}^n_k$; what if one considers a separable field $k\neq {\...
sms1's user avatar
  • 193
6 votes
1 answer
334 views

Naive question on local cohomology

Let $X$ be a smooth, projective variety and $Z_1, Z_2$ two smooth, projective subvarieties in $X$ of the same dimension. Let $E$ be a locally free sheaf on $X$. Recall, there are natural morphims: $$...
Chen's user avatar
  • 1,593
6 votes
1 answer
761 views

The Yoneda pairing, hypercohomology, and cup product

Let $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ be coherent analytic sheaves on $\mathbb{P}^n$. Let $\mathcal{F}_\bullet$ be a locally free resolution of $\mathcal{F}$. In Principles of Algebraic Geometry by ...
Svinto's user avatar
  • 294
6 votes
1 answer
284 views

Formal character of local cohomology groups with support in Schubert cells

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero, $G$ a connected semi-simple algebraic group over $k$ and $B$ a fixed Borel subgroup of $G$ with maximal torus $T$. Also denote by $W$ the Weyl-group of $G$. ...
KKD's user avatar
  • 473
6 votes
1 answer
294 views

When does isomorphism on singular cohomology imply isomorphism on Picard and Brauer groups?

Assume that $f:X\to Y$ is a morphism of complex varieties, and the homomorphisms $H^i_\text{sing}(f)$ are bijective for $0\le i\le 3$ (though possibly $3$ is too much here:)). Under which ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
261 views

Do general sheaves on P^2 have cohomology governed by their Euler characteristic?

Suppose $\xi$ is chern character on $\mathbb P^2$. Then there is a moduli space $M(\xi)$ of semistable sheaves of chern character $\xi$. If $\xi$ has Euler characteristic 0, then apparently there is ...
Drew's user avatar
  • 1,509
6 votes
0 answers
1k views

Intuition behind exceptional inverse image?

The story is probably well-known: given a map $f:X\to Y$ of spaces (say schemes, but there are many other contexts), we have two classical operations between sheaves on $X$ and those on $Y$: the ...
Wojowu's user avatar
  • 28.2k
6 votes
2 answers
445 views

Representability of flat cohomology by a group scheme

In his paper "Supersingular K3 surfaces", Artin states the following theorem (Theorem 3.1) without proof: Let $\pi:X \to S = \mathrm{Spec}(k)$ be a smooth proper surface with $k$ an ...
naf's user avatar
  • 10.5k
6 votes
0 answers
637 views

Calculation in prismatic cohomology

In the standard references for prismatic cohomology, most theorems are proved in a local context (i.e. with completeness assumptions), and the devissage to the global case (i.e. smooth proper ...
Vitay's user avatar
  • 91

1
2 3 4 5