Questions tagged [sites]

For question related to the mathematical notion of site, which among others generalizes the notion of topological space. For questions on internet-sites use online-resources, but note that these question need to be very specific to research-level mathematics to be on-topic.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1
vote
0answers
115 views

Confusion in understanding the notion of $G$ Principal bundle where $G$ is a geometric group over a site

The first paragraph of the section Overview in the paper Principal infinity-bundles - General theory by Nikolaus, Schreiber and Stevenson https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0248 precisely reads the following: ...
1
vote
0answers
165 views

Čech-Alexander complex in computing (crystalline/prismatic) cohomology

I have a naive question about Čech-Alexander complexes in prismatic cohomology (although I suspect that the situation is similar for crystalline cohomology). They seemed to be introduced as a method ...
7
votes
0answers
174 views

What is a morphism of ∞-sites?

Recall that a morphism of sites is a covering-flat functor that preserves covering families. Morphisms of sites can be identified with those geometric morphisms of induced toposes for which the ...
12
votes
1answer
719 views

Are there (enough) injectives in condensed abelian groups?

The question is very simple : does $Cond(\mathbf{Ab})$, the category of condensed abelian groups (as defined in Scholze's Lectures in Condensed Mathematics), have enough injectives ? Does it, in fact,...
3
votes
1answer
180 views

What to call a morphism of sites inducing an equivalence on categories of sheaves?

Is there a standard term for a morphism of sites $(C,J)\to(C',J')$ which induces an equivalence on sheaf categories $\operatorname{Sh}(C',J')\xrightarrow\sim\operatorname{Sh}(C,J)$? The nLab entry ...
14
votes
1answer
584 views

Has this “backwards” perspective on toposes been studied?

Topos theory can be seen as a categorification of topology via the following analogies. \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{locales}&\text{Grothendieck toposes}\\\hline \text{open sets}&\text{...
1
vote
0answers
71 views

“Covering-flat” part in definition of morphism of sites

Let $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{I})$ and $(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{J})$ be sites where $\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{D}$ are categories and $\mathcal{I}$ and $\mathcal{J}$ are Grothendieck topologies on $\mathcal{C}...
4
votes
1answer
272 views

How to construct cup-product in a general site?

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site on the category of schemes for some Grothendieck topology, $X$ a scheme, and let $F,G$ be two sheaves of abelian groups on $\mathcal{C}$. Do we have cup-product as follows? ...
0
votes
0answers
282 views

Grothendieck topology on a scheme equivalent to the circle

Suppose a class of morphisms of schemes is reasonable enough so that we can associate a small site to any scheme (just like small étale site). Is there a simple class of morphisms such that there is a ...
9
votes
1answer
370 views

Points of the big Zariski site

It's relatively simple to show that the geometric morphisms $ \mathbf{Set} \to \mathrm{Sh}(\mathbf{CRing}^\mathrm{op}_{\mathrm{fp}}, \mathrm{Zar})$ correspond to local rings. More precisely, since ...
2
votes
0answers
137 views

Pullback of a constant sheaf over arbitrary sites

Given a geometric morphism between arbitrary Grothendieck topoi, $f:\mathcal{Sh(D)}\to\mathcal{Sh(C)}$, does the pullback $f^{-1}$ (i.e, the left adjoint) take constant sheafs to constant sheafs?
6
votes
1answer
319 views

Equivalence of the definitions of a sheaf in SGA4 and in “Categories and Sheaves”

I asked this question on Mathematics Stack Exchange, but got no answer. I don't understand why the definition of a sheaf (Definition 17.3.1 (ii)) given in the book [KS] Categories and Sheaves by ...
10
votes
0answers
384 views

Differential Forms in Infinite Dimensions

In Kriegl/Michor's book "The convenient setting of global analysis", they define the space of differential $k$-forms on a possibly infinite-dimensional manifold $M$ as the space of smooth sections of ...
4
votes
0answers
160 views

Is the restriction of sheaves from the big to small etale sites an equivalence?

Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $(\mathrm{Sch}/X)_{ét}$ and $X_{ét}$ be the big and small étale sites, resp. Is the restriction functor from $\operatorname{Sh}((\mathrm{Sch}/X)_{ét})$ to $\operatorname{Sh}(...
6
votes
0answers
125 views

Dense (∞,1)-subsites

So if $C$ is a 1-site and $D$ is a subsite (with the induced coverage), there are some conditions that ensure that the pre-composition and right Kan extension functors yield an equivalence of ...
4
votes
1answer
261 views

Stacks for the extensive topology?

Recall that any extensive category can be canonically endowed the structure of a site via the extensive topology, which is the Grothendieck topology whose covering morphisms are the coproduct ...
1
vote
0answers
62 views

Morphism of 2-sites

Let $X$ and $Y$ be Grothendieck sites. A $\textit{morphism}$ between $X$ and $Y$ is a functor on the underlying categories that is covering-flat and preserves covering families. See https://ncatlab....
5
votes
0answers
215 views

Examples of nonstable ∞-categories in which sifted colimits commute with finite limits

What are some natural examples (if any) of nonstable ∞-categories in which finite limits commute with sifted colimits (or rather just colimits over Δ^op)? Stable ∞-categories do satisfy this property,...
5
votes
1answer
315 views

Categorification of covering morphisms

Given a category $\mathsf{A}$, let $\mathsf{Fam}(\mathsf{A})$ be its free coproduct cocompletion (which is always extensive). This means every object has a unique up to iso presentation as a coproduct ...
1
vote
0answers
172 views

$\mathbb E$-descent maps in topological spaces in terms of different sites?

The paper Facets of Descent I by Janelidze and Tholen defines $\mathbb E$-descent maps as those for which $\Phi^p:\mathbb EB\longrightarrow \mathsf{Des}_\mathbb{E}(p)$ is an equivalence of categories. ...
0
votes
1answer
84 views

A confusion about covering flatness

I'm reading this entry on nLab. But I'm confusing with the notion of covering-flatness. More precisely, I meet some trouble when I try to show that the $Sets$-valued flatness is a special case of ...
10
votes
0answers
337 views

Making the conceptual leap from locales to Grothendieck topologies?

I find the definition for locales and sheaves on locales to be straightforward, but I'm stumbling over the idea of a Grothendieck topology. Is there a nice way to see roughly how the latter ...
3
votes
2answers
394 views

Morphism on schemes induced by continuous morphism of sites

I am beginner in the theory of Grothendieck topologies and I have the following question. Let $X, Y$ be schemes over an algebraically closed field $k$. Denote by $X_{et}$ and $Y_{et}$ the Etale sites ...
8
votes
1answer
258 views

Which dense inclusions of sites are ∞-dense?

An inclusion of sites f: D→C is dense if it induces an equivalence between the categories of sheaves on C and D. Likewise, f is ∞-dense is it induces an equivalence between the ∞-categories of ∞-...
3
votes
2answers
332 views

1st cech cohomology groups on ringed sites

Let $(C, O)$ be a ringed site -- i.e., $C$ is a small category with a grothendieck topology $\tau$ and $O$ a sheaf of rings on the site $(C,\tau)$. In this context, for any object $U$ of $C$ one can ...
16
votes
1answer
1k views

Points in sites (etale, fppf, … )

I asked a part of this in an earlier question, but that part of my question didn't receive precedence. Etale site is useful - examples of using the small fppf site? Let $X$ be a scheme (assume it ...
20
votes
2answers
2k views

Etale site is useful - examples of using the small fppf site?

Edit: After the answers and comments, I'm hoping for a little bit of elaboration (in the comment to the answer below.) Also, question 2 was discussed here: Points in sites (etale, fppf, ... ) There, ...