Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
13 votes
2 answers
1k views

What's the deal with De Morgan algebras and Kleene algebras?

The notion of Boolean algebras, and the corresponding classical propositional logic, is very standard, and it is easy to find information about them (for example, among many other such works, there is ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k
4 votes
1 answer
189 views

Do idempotents in an abelian category constitute a lattice?

Consider an object $X$ in an abelian category $\mathcal{C}$. We define $\text{Idem}_{\mathcal{C}}(X)$ as the set of idempotent endomorphisms $a$ in $\text{End}_{\mathcal{C}}(X)$, meaning that $a \circ ...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
234 views

Minimum number of elements needed to represent a lattice with a union-closed family of sets

I know that it is possible to represent every finite lattice $L$ with a union-closed family $\mathcal{F}$ containing the empty set: for every $x\in L$, let $S_x=\{y\in L\, :\, y\not\geq x\}$ and $\...
Fabius Wiesner's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
109 views

Sublattice isomorphisms

Let $L$ be a non-distributive complete (bounded) lattice with the greatest element $1$ and the smallest element $0$. Definitions: For a given $x,y\in L$, let's use the notation $[x,y] := \{z\in L: x\...
Onur Oktay's user avatar
  • 2,605
3 votes
1 answer
119 views

Non-isomorphic $T_0$-spaces with order-isomorphic topologies

Are there non-isomorphic $T_0$-spaces $(X_i, \tau_i)$ for $i = 1,2$ such that $\tau_1 \cong \tau_2$ when considered as partially ordered sets?
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
271 views

Is every finite lattice isomorphic to a union-closed family of sets containing $\emptyset$?

If a family of sets $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^E$ is union-closed and contains $\emptyset$, then $\mathcal{F}$ forms a lattice under the set-inclusion order. To see this, note that unions give the join ...
Clay Thomas's user avatar
29 votes
0 answers
665 views

A conjecture about inclusion–exclusion

$\newcommand\calF{\mathcal{F}} \def\cupdot {\stackrel{\bullet}{\cup}} \def\minusdot {\stackrel{\bullet}{\setminus}}$This post presents a conjecture that we have with some colleagues. It is about ...
M.Monet's user avatar
  • 391
6 votes
1 answer
254 views

Fixed points for finitary distributive lattices bijection

Birkhoff's Fundamental Theorem of Finite Distributive Lattices says that there is a bijection $$ \{ \textrm{finite posets}\} \to \{ \textrm{finite distributive lattices}\} $$ $$ P \mapsto J(P), $$ ...
Sam Hopkins's user avatar
  • 24.2k
3 votes
1 answer
222 views

Embedding of a poset with "desirable" characteristics

Let $(P, \succeq)$ be a poset (you can assume $\succeq$ is not empty). I am interested in finding a poset $(X, \succeq^*)$ that embeds $(P, \succeq)$, and $\forall x,y \in X$ both of the following ...
Pedram's user avatar
  • 97
4 votes
1 answer
216 views

Lattice description of matroid duality

Apologies for this very basic question in matroid theory, but I could not find anything about it online after a bit of searching. There is a well-known bijective correspondence ("cryptomorphism&...
Sam Hopkins's user avatar
  • 24.2k
0 votes
0 answers
117 views

"Infima" and "suprema" in the homomorphism preorder on hypergraphs on $\omega$

$\newcommand{Po}{{\cal P}(\omega)}$ $\newcommand{lh}{\leq_{\text{hom}}}$ If $H_i = (V_i, E_i)$ are hypergraphs for $i = 1,2$, then a map $f:V_1 \to V_2$ is said to be a (hypergraph) homomorphism if $f(...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
125 views

Can we extend "every finite lattice is a sublattice of partitions of a finite set" to linear and/or finitary lattices?

Pudlák and Tůma https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02482893 proved that every finite lattice can be embedded as a sublattice of the partition lattice of a finite set. Can this be generalized ...
Dale's user avatar
  • 429
9 votes
1 answer
364 views

Are the Boolean algebras ${\cal P}(\omega)/(\text{fin})$ and ${\cal P}(\omega)/(\text{thin})$ isomorphic?

A set $A\subseteq \omega$ is said to be thin if $$\lim\sup_{n\to\infty}\frac{|A\cap \{0,\ldots, n\}|}{n+1} = 0.$$ We say for $A, B\subseteq \omega$ that $A\simeq_\text{fin} B$ if the symmetric ...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
213 views

Reference Request for "Finite Semilattice with Top and Bottom is a Lattice"

Let $\mathcal{O}(P)$ be a finite, completely distributive lattice of all lower sets ordered by set inclusion. Moreover, let $K =\; \mathrel{\{} h(x) \mathrel{|} x \in \mathcal{O}(P) \mathrel{\}}$ be ...
Björn's user avatar
  • 33
5 votes
2 answers
478 views

Generalization of the concept of a measure

Consider the following generalization of the concept of a measure: Let $L = (X, \lor, \land, \bot)$ be a semi-bounded lattice. Let $M = (Y, \bullet, e)$ be a commutative monoid. An $(L, M)$-measure is ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
5 votes
0 answers
201 views

Is this "trimming" of a supersolvable semimodular lattice known?

Let $L$ be a finite (upper) semimodular lattice. Recall that this means $L$ is graded and its rank function $\rho\colon L \to \mathbb{N}$ satisfies $$ \rho(x) + \rho(y) \geq \rho(x\vee y)+\rho(x \...
Sam Hopkins's user avatar
  • 24.2k
13 votes
1 answer
283 views

Can any poset of cardinality $\leq 2^{\aleph_0}$ be embedded in ${\cal P}(\omega)/(\text{fin})$?

We endow ${\cal P}(\omega)$ with an equivalence relation by saying that $A\simeq_{\text{fin}} B$ iff the symmetric difference $A\Delta B$ is finite. The resulting set of equivalence classes is denoted ...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
467 views

Is every finite poset a subset of a finite complemented distributive lattice?

Let $(X,\succeq)$ be a poset. I have the following two questions: Is it true that there exists a finite complemented distributive lattice (a Boolean lattice) $(S, \succeq^*)$ such that $X\subseteq S$ ...
Pedram's user avatar
  • 97
1 vote
0 answers
75 views

When can we separate two pairs in ${\mathbb H}_n$, although it is not a lattice?

Recall that a lattice is a partially ordered set $E$ for which any pair $a,b\in E$ admits a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound. Remark that given four elements $a_i,b_j$ ($j=1,2$), in order ...
Denis Serre's user avatar
  • 52.3k
6 votes
1 answer
356 views

Is every homogeneous poset a lattice?

A poset $(P,\leq)$ is homogeneous if $P\cong [a,b]$ for all $a,b\in P$ with $a<b$ (where $[a,b] := \{x\in P: a\leq x\leq b\}$). Examples of homogeneous posets include $[0,1]$, $[0,1]\cap \mathbb{Q}$...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
105 views

What is known about sublocales defined by regular nuclei?

(For basic terminology, which is supposed to be standard anyway, see this other question, which inspired this one.) I am interested in nuclei $j\colon L\to L$ on a frame $L$ which are regular elements ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k
3 votes
1 answer
228 views

Computing the Heyting operation on the frame of nuclei

(The following definitions are meant to be standard and are reproduced for completeness of the question.) A frame is a partially ordered set in which every finite subset has a greatest lower bound (“...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k
5 votes
2 answers
496 views

Do germs of open sets around a point form a frame?

Let $X$ be a topological space and $x \in X$ a point. Let $\Omega$ be the set of open sets (viꝫ. the topology) of $X$, and $\Omega_x$ the set of germs around $x$ of open sets, that is, $\Omega_x = \...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k
8 votes
1 answer
356 views

Example of trickiness of finite lattice representation problem?

I'm trying to come up with a good explanation for my students of why the finite lattice representation problem is difficult. I've already shown that the "greedy approach" to representing the ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
114 views

Product-decomposition of ${\cal P}(\omega)/\rm{fin}$ [closed]

For $A,B\in {\cal P}(\omega)$ let us say that $A\simeq_{\rm{fin}} B$ if both $A\setminus B$ and $B\setminus A$ are finite. It is easy to see that this establishes an equivalence relation on ${\cal P}(\...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
234 views

To whom is the classification of atomic, modular finite lattices due?

Here lattice means a poset with meets and joins. A lattice is called atomic if every element is a join of atoms. There are a few different ways to define modular for finite lattices: one is that the ...
Sam Hopkins's user avatar
  • 24.2k
2 votes
0 answers
52 views

Can we decompose an increasing net of functions into two increasing nets with prescribed supports?

Let $K$ be a compact Hausdorff space and let $U,V\subset K$ be open. Let $\left(f_{i}\right)_{i\in I}$ be an increasing net of continuous non-negative functions such that $f_{i}\le 1$ and $f_{i}$ ...
erz's user avatar
  • 5,529
10 votes
4 answers
928 views

Are arbitrary nonempty intersections of principal filters principal?

Suppose $\langle L,\leq\rangle$ is a lattice with join $\sqcup$. Let $F_1$ and $F_2$ be principal filters on $L$. Thus, for $i\in I=\{1,2\}$ there are $x_i\in L$ so that $F_i=\{y\in L:x_i\leq y\}$. In ...
underwhelmer's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
188 views

Natural bijection between join- and meet-irreducibles in modular lattices?

A well known property of finite modular lattices is that they have the same number of join-irreducible and meet-irreducible elements. I was wondering if there exists a natural bijection between these ...
Igor Makhlin's user avatar
  • 3,513
14 votes
5 answers
881 views

Birkhoff's representation theorem vs matroid-geometric lattice correspondence

This question is motivated by the superficial observation that Birkhoff's representation theorem and the cryptomorphism between matroids and geometric lattices are sort of similar. The former says ...
Igor Makhlin's user avatar
  • 3,513
5 votes
1 answer
218 views

Classification of multiplicative lattices

Question 1:Is there a classification of finite lattices which admit a multiplication making them into a finite multiplicative lattices? (see https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/Multiplicative_lattice ...
Mare's user avatar
  • 26.5k
7 votes
0 answers
139 views

poset of lattice properties

Is there a good overview of the dependencies between properties that a (finite) lattice poset can have? To give a practical example, I was looking for a property weaker than congruence uniform and ...
Martin Rubey's user avatar
  • 5,822
5 votes
0 answers
197 views

Weak compactness is to trees as [?] is to lattices?

Let $\kappa$ be an inaccessible cardinal. Recall that $\kappa$ is weakly compact if every tree of height $\kappa$ has either a level of size $\kappa$ or a branch of size $\kappa$. So if $\kappa$ is a ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 63.9k
2 votes
1 answer
119 views

Dedekind-MacNeille completion of ${\cal P}(\omega)/({\rm fin})$

Let ${\cal P}(\omega)/({\rm fin})$ be the quotient of the Boolean algebra ${\cal P}(\omega)$ where two sets are considered to be equivalent if they differ by a finite number of elements. It turns out ...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
504 views

"Pseudo-Boolean" lattice (almost every element has several complements)

If $(L,\leq)$ is a lattice with bottom element $0$ and top element $1$ and $x\in L$ we say that $y$ is a complement of $x$ if $x\vee y = 1$ and $x\wedge y = 0$. Is there a lattice $(L,\leq)$ with more ...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
150 views

In a constructive order/lattice theory are the arbitrary join and the weak suprema the same?

For a poset $X$ we define an upperbound $w \in X$ of a subset $S \subseteq X$ to be a weak-supremum if $(\forall a \in S (a \leq b)) \implies w \leq b$. While a supremum is defined more carefully (in ...
ToucanIan's user avatar
  • 411
3 votes
0 answers
214 views

Does every finite lattice embed into a finite Eulerian lattice?

A finite Boolean lattice is a lattice isomorphic to the subset lattice of a finite set. Every Boolean lattice is Eulerian, namely, a graded lattice $L$ such that $\mu(a,b) = (-1)^{|b|-|a|}$ for all $a,...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
249 views

closure operator on a complete lattice arising from adjunction on lattice itself

Define a closure operator on a complete lattice $L$ as a function $f:L \to L$ which is order preserving and idempotent and satisfies $x \leq fx$. Every closure operator arises from an adjunction ...
John Stell's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
551 views

Can one characterize maximal antichains in terms of distributive lattices?

This is inspired by the recent question Verification of a maximal antichain The celebrated duality between finite posets and finite distributive lattices has several nice formulations. One of them ...
მამუკა ჯიბლაძე's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
129 views

Ordering preserved by an inverse frame homomorphism

Recall that a frame homomorphism $h:L\to M$ is called ($L$ and $M$ are frames): Dense if, for any $x ∈ L$, $h(x) = 0$ implies $x = 0$. Codense if, for any $x ∈ L$, $h(x) = 1$ implies $x = 1$. ...
Biller Alberto's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
294 views

Euler characteristic of the simplicial complex of sets of elements in a semilattice with non-zero meet

In a combinatorial computation, I came across the following quantity: Consider a finite meet semilattice $L$, that is, a finite poset which is closed under $\min$. Denote the least element of $L$ by $...
Christian Gorski's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
177 views

How to construct a lattice having a subset of a given relations?

I am given a (smallish, say $n=14$ element) set $X$, and a set $R$ of (a few hundred) quadruples of elements $(a, b, c, d)$ with $a,b,c, d\in X$. I want to construct lattices on $X$, such that for all ...
Martin Rubey's user avatar
  • 5,822
12 votes
11 answers
1k views

Lattices on classical combinatorial families

I am asking for examples of lattices defined on classical combinatorial families, such as Permutations, Catalan objects, set partitions or integer partitions, graphs. I am mosty interested in lattices ...
Martin Rubey's user avatar
  • 5,822
10 votes
1 answer
492 views

is there a ‘nice’ lattice on the set of unlabelled graphs with $n$ vertices?

It is easy to endow the set of vertex-labelled graphs with $n$ vertices with a lattice structure: take the union and the intersection of the edge set as meet and join respectively. However, I wonder ...
Martin Rubey's user avatar
  • 5,822
10 votes
2 answers
445 views

Class of lattices that excludes $M_3$?

It is well known that a lattice is distributive iff it excludes as a sublattice $N_5$ (the pentagon) and $M_3$ (three unordered elements with a top and bottom). Further, a lattice that only excludes $...
Gershom B's user avatar
  • 123
0 votes
2 answers
526 views

The union of two cuts is a cut?

Every poset $\langle P, \leq \rangle$ has a Dedekind-MacNeille completion, a complete lattice that embeds $\langle P, \leq \rangle$. For $A \subseteq P$, the upset $U(A) = \{p \in P\ |\ \forall a \in ...
gnarizard's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
124 views

Explicit lifting characterization of complete lattices among posets?

It's well-known that the complete lattices are characterized among all posets as the regular-injectives. That is, a poset $L$ is a complete lattice if and only if $L$ has the right lifting property ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 63.9k
0 votes
2 answers
103 views

Is this ordering on the set of all covers of $\omega$ a (complete) lattice?

Let ${\frak C} \subseteq {\cal P}({\cal P}(\omega))$ be the collection of all covers of $\omega$ (that is, ${\cal C} \in {\frak C}$ iff $\bigcup {\cal C} = \omega$.) We define the following binary ...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
289 views

Does the lattice of partitions map onto the lattice of subsets?

Let $X\neq \emptyset$ be a set and let $X^X$ denote the collection of all functions $f:X\to X$. We put a binary relation (reflexive and transitive), the composition preorder on $X^X$ by setting for $f,...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
102 views

Are non-trivial interval-isomorphic posets lattices?

We say that a partially ordered set $(P,\leq)$ is interval-isomorphic if for all $a<b \in P$ we have $P \cong [a,b]$, where $[a,b]=\{x\in P:a\leq x\leq b\}$. Suppose $(P,\leq)$ is interval-...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar