Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
14 votes
1 answer
746 views

Can there exist Chow motives/motivic cohomology for compact Kähler manifolds?

Can there exist a 'reasonable' extension of the (higher) Chow groups of complex smooth projective algebraic varieties to functors on the category of compact Kähler manifolds? Are there any ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
2k views

(Mixed) Tate motives

Hi there, in recent times I was reading texts about motives, and I want to ask something about Tate motives which is not clear to me (as I came across different definitions in different texts). Let ...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,547
2 votes
1 answer
555 views

Chow group of a (particular) motive [+ reference request]

I have two (not unrelated) questions. Let me first give a short introduction. Introduction For a general overview of the setup I refer to the introduction (§1) of [Zhang]. Let $k$ be a number field ...
jmc's user avatar
  • 5,504
18 votes
2 answers
1k views

Grothendieck ring of "varieties carrying a function"

Fix a base ring $R$, and consider pairs $(X,f)$ where $X$ is a scheme of finite type over $R$ and $f:X\to R$ is an $R$-valued algebraic (not constructible!) function on $X$. I want to consider a ...
Allen Knutson's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

motivic t-structure and realisations

Let $k$ be a field and $DM_k$ denote the triangulated category of geometric motives with $ \mathbb{Q}$ coeffients over $k$. Recall that there exists a motive functor $M: Var_k\rightarrow DM_k$, which ...
user's user avatar
  • 81
71 votes
1 answer
8k views

What is the relationship between motivic cohomology and the theory of motives?

I will begin by giving a rough sketch of my understanding of motives. In many expositions about motives (for example, http://www.jmilne.org/math/xnotes/MOT102.pdf), the category of motives is defined ...
Makhalan Duff's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
767 views

Realization of Voevodsky Motives over a perfect field in mixed categories.

Let $k$ be a finite field and $l$ be different from characteristic of $k$. Is there a realization functor from the Voevodsky's category with $\mathbb Q$ coefficients to the constructible mixed étale ...
vava's user avatar
  • 113
4 votes
1 answer
603 views

A question about the Tannakian etale fundamental group of a curve

Let $X$ be a smooth connected quasi-projective curve over $\mathbf{Q}$. Let $U$ be the pro-unipotent etale fundamental group of $X$ over $\mathbf{Q}_p$. $U^1 = U$ and let $U^n =[U,U^{n-1}]$. Let $n\...
Harry's user avatar
  • 1,213
3 votes
0 answers
638 views

Weak Lefschetz for torsion motivic cohomology (or torsion Chow groups)?

I am trying to prove the following Weak-Lefschetz-type statement for motivic cohomology: if $Z$ is a smooth hyperplane section of a smooth projective $X$ of dimension $d$ (say, over the field of ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
26 votes
1 answer
4k views

Voevodsky's counterexample to the existence of a motivic t-structure

I have been trying to unravel some of the known relationships between various ideas on mixed motives. I find the literature quite hard to follow -"from experts, for experts". Voevodsky in "...
plm's user avatar
  • 982
15 votes
1 answer
769 views

Crystalline realization of mixed Tate motives

Deligne and Goncharov, in their article of 2005, mention that the crystalline realization functor has yet to be worked out. What's the current state of the literature on this? And how big of an issue ...
Ishaidc's user avatar
  • 313
5 votes
2 answers
848 views

Is there for every variety X an abelian variety A such that their 1st l-adic cohomologies are isomorphic?

This question is somewhat inspired by Kevin Buzzard's answer to What is the interpretation of complex multiplication in terms of Langlands? and somewhat from my own curiosity about such topics. Let $...
Makhalan Duff's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
2k views

How does the conjectural Langlands group fit into the Tannakian point of view?

I've read that one way to formulate the Langlands program is the following: Let $\mathcal{L}_ {\mathbb{Q}}$ be the conjectural Langlands group. Then the category of semi-simple (continuous) ...
14 votes
2 answers
2k views

How would a motivic proof of the Riemann hypothesis over finite fields go?

It is well known that Grothendieck had a different idea than Deligne about how one should go about proving the Riemann hypothesis for finite fields. However, since Grothendieck's desired proof never ...
James D. Taylor's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
777 views

Is the "L-function of the complex cohomology" of a motive equal to the L-function of its l-adic realization?

Let's say I have a motive in $\mathcal{M}_{num}(K)$ ($K$ a number field). For each prime $l$ there is a realization of this motive in terms of etale cohomology with coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}_l$. ...
James D. Taylor's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
299 views

(why) Are the following two constructions of zeta functions equal?

Let $X$ be a variety defined over $\mathbb{Q}$. One has the usual Hasse-Weil zeta function. Now, let's do a different construction. Base change $X$ to $\mathbb{C}$: $X_{\mathbb{C}}$. Now look at its ...
James D. Taylor's user avatar
23 votes
2 answers
2k views

Why would the category of Motives be Tannakian?

After reading the answer to my previous question: What are the different theories that the motivic fundamental group attempts to unify? I decided to read up on Tannakian formalism. Given the ...
James D. Taylor's user avatar
19 votes
2 answers
3k views

What are the different theories that the motivic fundamental group attempts to unify?

I must preface by confessing complete ignorance in the subject. I've read introductory texts about the theory of motives, but I am certainly no expert. In http://www.math.ias.edu/files/deligne/...
James D. Taylor's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
242 views

Are Tate twists of t-positive motives positive with respect to the Voevodsky's homotopy t-structure?

Let $X$ be a Voevodsky's motif (over a perfect field) that belongs to the positive part of the homotopy $t$-structure (i.e. its cohomology as an object of $D^-(ShSmCor)$ is zero in negative degrees). ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
141 votes
0 answers
13k views

Grothendieck-Teichmüller conjecture

(1) In "Esquisse d'un programme", Grothendieck conjectures Grothendieck-Teichmüller conjecture: the morphism $$ G_{\mathbb{Q}} \longrightarrow Aut(\widehat{T}) $$ is an isomorphism. Here $...
AFK's user avatar
  • 7,527
8 votes
1 answer
985 views

commutativity constraint in Grothendieck's motives

This is a basic question about Grothendieck's conjectural category $M_k$ of pure motives (over a field $k$). This construction first produces a category (the "false category of motives") which need ...
SGP's user avatar
  • 3,867
3 votes
1 answer
767 views

Is there a 'classical' definition for the support of a perverse sheaves.

I would like to define the support of a mixed motivic sheaf. This should be something similar to the support of a perverse sheaf.:) Is there any 'classical' definition for the latter? I suspect that ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
1k views

Are two conjectural descriptions of the motivic t-structure (via cohomology and via affine varieties) known to be equivalent?

I know of two conjectural descriptions of the motivic $t$-structure for Voevodsky's motives. The first one is based on the conjecture that Weil cohomology theories should yield exact and ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
392 views

Could the Kunneth decomposition of a motif depend on the choice of $l$?

Suppose that over some (algebraically closed) field $K$ of characteristic $p>0$ we have: numerical equivalence of cycles coincides with homological one with respect to ${\mathbb{Q}}_{l}$ and ${\...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

If the numerical equivalence of cycles coincides with the homological one, does the Hodge standard conjecture follow?

Suppose that over an algebraically closed field $K$ of finite characteristic the numerical equivalence of cycles relation (for algebraic cycles of smooth projective varieties) coincides with the ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
178 views

$G_m$-cohomology of a motif (that corresponds to a stack?)

As in the question For a G-variety, what could one say about the motif of the corresponding simplicial variety I am in the following situation: $G$ is an algerbraic group, and X is a smooth $G$-...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
288 views

Do $Q_l$-etale Euler characteristics of Chow motives coincide for all $l$?

I am interested in (Chow) motives over (algebraically closed) characteristic $p>0$ fields. For $H$ being $\mathbb{Q}_l$-adic cohomology, one can consider $Ch_l(M)=\sum (-1)^i\dim_{\mathbb{Q}_l} H^i(...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
515 views

A motivic complex

By definition, Voevodsky's motivic complex (an object of his $DM^{eff}_-$) is a complex of sheaves with transfers whose cohomology sheaves are homotopy invariant. Now, I consider the complex (of ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
284 views

For a G-variety, what could one say about the motif of the corresponding simplicial variety

Let G be an algerbraic group, and X be a G-variety (that I will assume to be smooth). Then one can consider a simlicial variety whose terms are $G^i\times X$. This simplicial variety yields a 'complex ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
589 views

Are finite correspondances flat?

In Voevodsky&Mazza&Weibel's book on motivic cohomology they define "an elementary correspondance from X (Smooth connected scheme over $k$) to Y (separated scheme over $k$) as an irreducible ...
Tintin's user avatar
  • 2,871
10 votes
1 answer
743 views

Stable motivic cohomology with finite coefficients?

In this question, which attracted no responces so far, I've asked whether it is possible to extend the Beilinson-Lichtenbaum etale descent rule for motivic cohomology to singular varieties, in ...
Leonid Positselski's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
661 views

A composition of a finite morphisms with the transpose correspondence: is it the multiplication by the degree?

Let $X,Y$ be smooth varieties over a field $k$ (which in my case is perfect of finite characteristic $p$; we may also assume that $X,Y$ are connected); $s:Y\to X$ is a finite morphism of degree $d$. ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
729 views

Integral decomposition of the diagonal (Chow motives)

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and let $X$ be a smooth proper varity over $k$ of dimension $d$. The Künneth standard conjecture conjectures that there exist projectors $e_0, e_1, \ldots, ...
Xandi Tuni's user avatar
  • 4,015
9 votes
1 answer
804 views

Motivic characterization of affine spaces

Let $k$ be a field and let $X$ be a smooth irreducible variety over $k$. Suppose that I know that the image of $X$ in the Grothendieck group of varieties over $k$ is equal to that of a) ${\mathbb A}^...
Alexander Braverman's user avatar
45 votes
2 answers
3k views

Langlands in dimension 2: the Yoshida conjecture

Background: One prominent part of the Langlands program is the conjecture that all motives are automorphic. It is of interest to consider special cases that are more precise, if less sweeping. ...
Laie's user avatar
  • 1,704
37 votes
1 answer
3k views

Morava on Shafarevich conjecture

$\DeclareMathOperator\Q{\mathbf{Q}}$Jack Morava has some interesting ideas stemming from stable homotopy theory and geometric topology on the Shafarevich Conjecture. The Shafarevich Conjecture states: ...
Romeo's user avatar
  • 2,734
6 votes
1 answer
1k views

When is the K-theory presheaf a sheaf?

Let $F$ be a Deligne-Mumford stack that is of finite type, smooth and proper over $\mathrm{Spec~}k$ for a perfect field $k$. Consider $K_m$, the presheaf of $m$-th $K$-groups on $F_{et}$, the etale ...
expz's user avatar
  • 562
7 votes
2 answers
882 views

Rankin-Selberg convolutions of motivic L-series

Background: Let $M_{f_i}, i=1,2$ be two modular motives associated to cusp forms $f_i \in S_{w_i}(\Gamma_0(N_i))$ of weight $w_i$ and level $N_i$ respectively. The Rankin-Selberg convolution ...
Laie's user avatar
  • 1,704
24 votes
3 answers
4k views

Are there "motivic" proofs of Weil conjectures in special cases?

This is a question meant as a first step to get into reading more on Weil conjectures and standard conjectures. It is known that the standard conjectures on vanishing of cycles would imply the Weil ...
Anweshi's user avatar
  • 7,442
30 votes
3 answers
4k views

t-structures and higher categories?

I'm curious to find out where the viewpoint of higher categories may be useful so here is a somewhat vague question (which may or may not have a reasonable answer). Given a triangulated category, one ...
algori's user avatar
  • 23.5k
18 votes
1 answer
6k views

Deligne's proof of Ramanujan's conjecture

I am trying to understand Deligne's proof of the Ramanujan conjecture and more generally how one associates geometric objects (ultimately, motives) to modular forms. As the first step, which I ...
Evgeny Shinder's user avatar
34 votes
2 answers
6k views

Derived Algebraic Geometry and Chow Rings/Chow Motives

I recently heard a talk about Chow motives and also read Milne's exposition on motives. If I understand it correctly, the naive definition of the Chow ring would be that it simply consists of all ...
Lennart Meier's user avatar
40 votes
8 answers
12k views

What is the proper initiation to the theory of motives for a new student of algebraic geometry?

A preliminary apology is in order: I realize that most of my contributions to this site are in the form of reference requests. I understand that this makes it seem as though I do nothing more than sit ...
lambdafunctor's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
2k views

Hodge standard conjecture in positive characteristic

In the Wikipedia article on the Hodge Standard Conjecture it is written (note [Oct. 2015]: it has since been fixed): In characteristic zero the Hodge standard conjecture holds, being a consequence ...
Dyke Acland's user avatar
  • 1,479
20 votes
2 answers
2k views

Unipotency in realisations of the motivic fundamental group

Deligne, in his 1987 paper on the fundamental group of $\mathbb{P}^1 \setminus \{0,1,\infty\}$ (in "Galois Groups over $\mathbb{Q}$"), defines a system of realisations for a motivic fundamental group. ...
Frank's user avatar
  • 2,976
4 votes
1 answer
1k views

Gauss--Manin connection for de Rham realisation

Let $X$ and $S$ be smooth schemes of finite type over a field $k$ and let $\pi:X\to S$ be a smooth morphism of finite type. The relative de Rham cohomology $H^i_{dR}(X/S)$ of $X$ over $S$ is a ...
Xandi Tuni's user avatar
  • 4,015
11 votes
0 answers
2k views

What are "fractional motives"?

Kirti Joshi's musings mention "fractional motives". Do you know what are they good for and what the current state of constructions is for them? Edit: Further cases of "fractional motives" as ...
Thomas Riepe's user avatar
  • 10.8k
16 votes
3 answers
3k views

Motives versus Motifs

I was in Paris recently for a meeting about motives or motifs, and since I'm too jet lagged for real work let me ask the following somewhat frivolous question. The word "motif" is usually translated ...
28 votes
3 answers
2k views

What do you lose when passing to the motive?

I contemplated about what information about a scheme we lose when passing to its motive. I came up with the following examples: The projective bundle of a vector bundle does only depend on the rank ...
user avatar
18 votes
4 answers
2k views

Why does one invert $G_m$ in the construction of the motivic stable homotopy category?

Morel and Voevodsky construct the motivic stable homotopy category, a category through which all cohomology theories factor and where they are representable, by starting with a category of schemes, ...
Peter Arndt's user avatar
  • 12.3k

1
4 5 6
7
8