Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3 votes
0 answers
175 views

Boundedness indices in Voevodsky's smash nilpotence conjecture in family

Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over an algebraically closed field $k$. Voevodsky introduced the following notion : an algebraic cycle $Z$ in $X$ is smash nilpotent if there exist $N>0$ such ...
Libli's user avatar
  • 7,300
11 votes
1 answer
1k views

How should I think about 1-motives?

By definition, a 1-motive over an algebraically closed field $k$ is the data $$ M = [X\stackrel{u}{\to}G] $$ where $X$ is a free abelian group of finite type, $G$ is a semi-abelian variety over $k$, ...
user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
213 views

Algebraic correspondence as morphisms in Betti cohomology

$\newcommand{\sing}{\mathrm{sing}}$Take a commutative ring $R$ and smooth projective complex varieties $X$ and $Y$. An element $\alpha\in CH^*(X\times Y)_R$ induces the algebraic correspondence for ...
OOOOOO's user avatar
  • 349
3 votes
0 answers
331 views

Motives (and examples) of projective bundles over projective spaces

If a projective bundle $Y$ over a variety $X$ is obtained from a vector bundle $E/X$ then the cohomology and the motif of $Y$ is known to be closely related to that of $X$. Now, what can one say in ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
270 views

Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory versus Weil cohomological theory [closed]

Can someone enlighten me what is the difference between an Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory ( See here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eilenberg%E2%80%93Steenrod_axioms ), and a Weil ...
Angel65's user avatar
  • 595
9 votes
0 answers
361 views

Would full resolution of singularities have cohomological implications beyond the alteration theory?

De Jong's result on alterations allows one to show the potential semistability of certain Galois representations arising from cohomology of varieties (among other things). If we knew the existence of ...
user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
300 views

Why the scissor relations in Grothendieck rings?

Let $k$ be a field, and let $K_0(V_k)$ be the Grothendieck ring of $k$-varieties. One type of relation which defines $K_0(V_k)$ is the following: if $A$ is a $k$-variety and $C$ a closed subset of $A$,...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,547
21 votes
1 answer
1k views

When simple cohomological computations predict ingenious algebro-geometric constructions?

Classical algebraic geometry is full of ingenious constructions and miraculous coincidences: 27 lines on a cubic surface are related to Weyl lattice of type $E_6,$ lines on an intersection of four-...
2 votes
0 answers
304 views

Should all cohomology theories have a smooth proper base change

Let $H$ be a cohomology theory with respect to some Grothendieck topology (e.g. Zariski, analytic, etale, fppf, Nisnevich, etc.) Does H satisfy smooth proper base? If yes, does this mean that "...
Ciro's user avatar
  • 119
1 vote
0 answers
176 views

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
591 views

Is there a yoga of effectivity for motives and their realizations?

Inside the 'usual' categories of motives (Chow, Voevodsky ones) there are the categories of effective motives. Similarly, there are effective Hodge structures; they seem to be closely related with ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
31 votes
1 answer
4k views

For which varieties is the natural map from the Chow ring to integral cohomology an isomorphism?

My apologies if this question is too naive. Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex variety. There is a natural map $A^{\bullet}(X) \to H^{2\bullet}(X)$ of graded rings from the Chow ring of $X$ to ...
Qiaochu Yuan's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
326 views

Voevodsky's 'split standard triple' argument: an explanation; does it work with $Z/nZ$-coefficients?

For varieties over a perfect field (of some characteristic $p$ that could be 0) Voevodsky defines the notion of a 'standard triple' (see http://books.google.ru/books?id=TzUmk87bN9cC&pg=PA85&...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
1k views

Are two conjectural descriptions of the motivic t-structure (via cohomology and via affine varieties) known to be equivalent?

I know of two conjectural descriptions of the motivic $t$-structure for Voevodsky's motives. The first one is based on the conjecture that Weil cohomology theories should yield exact and ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
178 views

$G_m$-cohomology of a motif (that corresponds to a stack?)

As in the question For a G-variety, what could one say about the motif of the corresponding simplicial variety I am in the following situation: $G$ is an algerbraic group, and X is a smooth $G$-...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
729 views

Integral decomposition of the diagonal (Chow motives)

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and let $X$ be a smooth proper varity over $k$ of dimension $d$. The Künneth standard conjecture conjectures that there exist projectors $e_0, e_1, \ldots, ...
Xandi Tuni's user avatar
  • 4,015