All Questions
16 questions
3
votes
0
answers
175
views
Boundedness indices in Voevodsky's smash nilpotence conjecture in family
Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over an algebraically closed field $k$. Voevodsky introduced the following notion : an algebraic cycle $Z$ in $X$ is smash nilpotent if there exist $N>0$ such ...
11
votes
1
answer
1k
views
How should I think about 1-motives?
By definition, a 1-motive over an algebraically closed field $k$ is the data
$$
M = [X\stackrel{u}{\to}G]
$$
where $X$ is a free abelian group of finite type, $G$ is a semi-abelian variety over $k$, ...
1
vote
0
answers
213
views
Algebraic correspondence as morphisms in Betti cohomology
$\newcommand{\sing}{\mathrm{sing}}$Take a commutative ring $R$ and smooth projective complex varieties $X$ and $Y$. An element $\alpha\in CH^*(X\times Y)_R$ induces the algebraic correspondence for ...
3
votes
0
answers
331
views
Motives (and examples) of projective bundles over projective spaces
If a projective bundle $Y$ over a variety $X$ is obtained from a vector bundle $E/X$ then the cohomology and the motif of $Y$ is known to be closely related to that of $X$. Now, what can one say in ...
1
vote
0
answers
270
views
Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory versus Weil cohomological theory [closed]
Can someone enlighten me what is the difference between an Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory ( See here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eilenberg%E2%80%93Steenrod_axioms ), and a Weil ...
9
votes
0
answers
361
views
Would full resolution of singularities have cohomological implications beyond the alteration theory?
De Jong's result on alterations allows one to show the potential semistability of certain Galois representations arising from cohomology of varieties (among other things). If we knew the existence of ...
3
votes
0
answers
300
views
Why the scissor relations in Grothendieck rings?
Let $k$ be a field, and let $K_0(V_k)$ be the Grothendieck ring of $k$-varieties. One type of relation which defines $K_0(V_k)$ is the following: if $A$ is a $k$-variety and $C$ a closed subset of $A$,...
21
votes
1
answer
1k
views
When simple cohomological computations predict ingenious algebro-geometric constructions?
Classical algebraic geometry is full of ingenious constructions and miraculous coincidences: 27 lines on a cubic surface are related to Weyl lattice of type $E_6,$ lines on an intersection of four-...
2
votes
0
answers
304
views
Should all cohomology theories have a smooth proper base change
Let $H$ be a cohomology theory with respect to some Grothendieck topology (e.g. Zariski, analytic, etale, fppf, Nisnevich, etc.)
Does H satisfy smooth proper base?
If yes, does this mean that "...
1
vote
0
answers
176
views
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
13
votes
1
answer
591
views
Is there a yoga of effectivity for motives and their realizations?
Inside the 'usual' categories of motives (Chow, Voevodsky ones) there are the categories of effective motives. Similarly, there are effective Hodge structures; they seem to be closely related with ...
31
votes
1
answer
4k
views
For which varieties is the natural map from the Chow ring to integral cohomology an isomorphism?
My apologies if this question is too naive.
Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex variety. There is a natural map $A^{\bullet}(X) \to H^{2\bullet}(X)$ of graded rings from the Chow ring of $X$ to ...
2
votes
0
answers
326
views
Voevodsky's 'split standard triple' argument: an explanation; does it work with $Z/nZ$-coefficients?
For varieties over a perfect field (of some characteristic $p$ that could be 0) Voevodsky defines the notion of a 'standard triple' (see http://books.google.ru/books?id=TzUmk87bN9cC&pg=PA85&...
14
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Are two conjectural descriptions of the motivic t-structure (via cohomology and via affine varieties) known to be equivalent?
I know of two conjectural descriptions of the motivic $t$-structure for Voevodsky's motives.
The first one is based on the conjecture that Weil cohomology theories should yield exact and ...
1
vote
0
answers
178
views
$G_m$-cohomology of a motif (that corresponds to a stack?)
As in the question For a G-variety, what could one say about the motif of the corresponding simplicial variety
I am in the following situation: $G$ is an algerbraic group, and X is a smooth $G$-...
7
votes
0
answers
729
views
Integral decomposition of the diagonal (Chow motives)
Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and let $X$ be a smooth proper varity over $k$ of dimension $d$. The Künneth standard conjecture conjectures that there exist projectors $e_0, e_1, \ldots, ...