Skip to main content

Questions tagged [sheaf-cohomology]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
62 votes
8 answers
14k views

Sheaf cohomology and injective resolutions

In defining sheaf cohomology (say in Hartshorne), a common approach seems to be defining the cohomology functors as derived functors. Is there any conceptual reason for injective resolution to come ...
user avatar
32 votes
3 answers
4k views

How should a homotopy theorist think about sheaf cohomology?

As a student of homotopy theory or algebraic topology, I have a certain outlook as to how one ought to think of a cohomology theory. There are axioms that help us with rudimentary computations, there ...
Sean Tilson's user avatar
  • 3,726
28 votes
1 answer
3k views

Two points of view about Borel-moore homology

They are several ways to define the Borel-Moore homology on a locally compact space $X$. The first one is by analogy with the singular homology but instead of using finite chains, we use locally ...
C. Dubussy's user avatar
  • 1,017
27 votes
0 answers
470 views

Are these comparison morphisms between Čech and Grothendieck cohomology the same?

For better or for worse, there is more than one approach to comparing Čech cohomology $\smash{\check{H}}^\bullet(\mathfrak{U},X;\mathscr{F})$ of a sheaf $\mathscr{F}$ on a space $X$ w.r.t the cover $\...
FShrike's user avatar
  • 1,020
26 votes
1 answer
4k views

When (or why) is a six-functor formalism enough?

The six functor formalism in a given cohomology theory consists of for each space a derived category of sheaves and six different ways to construct functors between those categories (four involving a ...
Will Sawin's user avatar
  • 149k
22 votes
1 answer
2k views

Is there a concrete application of topos theory?

The notion of topos was originally formulated in SGA 4 in the context of attacking the Weil conjectures. This formalism turned out to be unnecessary for the purposes of proving those conjectures. But ...
Kim's user avatar
  • 4,164
21 votes
2 answers
1k views

Cohomologically trivial stacks

The following theorem of Serre is well-known: A noetherian scheme $X$ is affine if and only if $H^i(X; \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for all quasi-coherent sheaves $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ and all $i>0$. (...
Lennart Meier's user avatar
19 votes
3 answers
2k views

Classification of rings satisfying $a^4=a$

We have the famous classification of rings satisfying $a^2=a$ (for each element $a$) in terms of Stone spaces, via $X \mapsto C(X,\mathbb{F}_2)$. Similarly, rings satisfying $a^3=a$ are classified by ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
17 votes
2 answers
2k views

Is there a complex which computes Cech cohomology?

Suppose $X$ is a (paracompact, Hausdorff) topological space and we want to define its Cech cohomology with coefficients in $\mathbb Z$. Here is the way I have seen this constructed. For each open ...
Mohan Swaminathan's user avatar
17 votes
2 answers
2k views

How to Draw Complex Line Bundles

I am giving a presentation soon on the Classification of Complex Line Bundles and I would like to have some very "basic" visualizations to use as examples. Background and Context I am considering ...
cheyne's user avatar
  • 1,611
16 votes
1 answer
1k views

Does every sheaf embed into a quasicoherent sheaf?

Question. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. Is there always a quasicoherent sheaf $\mathcal{E}'$ together with a monomorphism $\mathcal{E} \to \mathcal{E}'$?...
Ingo Blechschmidt's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
2k views

Where am I suppose to actually learn how to compute hypercohomology?

I'm reading about algebraic de Rham cohomology over characteristic zero which is constructed using hypercohomology. Already, constructing injective resolutions is difficult, and coupling this with ...
54321user's user avatar
  • 1,716
16 votes
1 answer
448 views

Zorn's lemma for Grothendieck sites

In every treatment of Grothendieck sites I can find, flasque sheaves are not defined in the way one would naïvely expect from ordinary sheaf cohomology; namely instead of saying that "restriction ...
cat man's user avatar
  • 163
15 votes
5 answers
6k views

Non-cohomological proof that the pullback of an ample bundle by a finite morphism is ample

It is a standard fact that for any finite morphism of proper Noetherian $A$-schemes ($A$ being Noetherian), the pullback of an ample line bundle is ample. The usual proof of this fact is via Serre's ...
Charles Staats's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
6k views

When does sheaf cohomology commute with arbitrary direct sums?

It is well known and more or less proven in Hartshorne's 'Algebraic Geometry' (p. 209) that for every noetherian scheme $X$ and every collection of abelian sheaves $\mathcal{F}_i$ the canonical map $$...
Lennart Meier's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
1k views

Etale homology via étale cosheaves

Can one develop a theory of étale homology via étale cosheaves? The hope is that this would, for example, return the Tate module (and not its dual) for an elliptic curve, and it would return group ...
David Corwin's user avatar
  • 15.4k
13 votes
1 answer
649 views

Sheaves in combinatorics and discrete geometry

I am looking for examples for the application of sheaves, sheaf-like constructions or the (co)homology of sheaves to problems in combinatorics and discrete geometry. For example given a poset $(P,\...
KoopaTroopa's user avatar
13 votes
0 answers
281 views

Kakuro puzzles and sheaf cohomology

This is a recreational, summer question and could be more well-suited for mathstackexchange. However, some of you on holiday could appreciate the topic. I recently came across Kakuro Puzzles, similar ...
Andrea Marino's user avatar
12 votes
3 answers
2k views

How to compute the cohomology of a local system?

Suppose we have a reasonable topological space $X$ (i.e. a complex algebraic variety or a manifold) whose integral singular cohomology and fundamental group we understand well. Suppose that we are ...
Kim's user avatar
  • 4,164
12 votes
1 answer
860 views

Algebraic groups without torsors

If $G$ is an algebraic group such that $H^1(S, G) = 0$ for all schemes $S$, must $G$ be the trivial group? My original motivation for the question is the rationale I always give students for studying ...
Jonathan Wise's user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
2k views

difference between the small and big étale/flat/... site

What is the difference between the small and the big étale (or flat or syntomic or ...) site? How does the cohomology vary? When should I use which one? Up to now, I have always used the small sites.
user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
557 views

Hodge to de Rham spectal sequence with twisted coefficients

Let $M$ be a smooth compact Kahler manifold and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a local system on $M$. Question 1: I assume that there exists a twisted Hodge to de Rham spectral sequence converging to $H^{p+q}(...
Lisa's user avatar
  • 321
12 votes
0 answers
1k views

Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms of sheaf cohomology

Cohomology of a space is often defined axiomatically: a cohomology theory is a functor from pairs of spaces to abelian groups satisfying the Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms. Is there a similar ...
Dan Petersen's user avatar
  • 40.3k
11 votes
1 answer
408 views

Resolutions of unbounded complexes: Condition ($\ast$) in Spaltenstein's paper

In the paper "Resolutions of unbounded complexes" (Compositio Math., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 121-154) N. Spaltenstein generalizes the 6 functor formalism to unbounded complexes of sheaves over ...
algori's user avatar
  • 23.5k
10 votes
4 answers
3k views

Cohomology of line bundles

For sure answers to my questions are well known - but I never saw them anywhere. Let $X$ be a smooth projective (or just proper) variety over an algebraically closed field $k$. Let $A_i$ be the ...
Piotr Achinger's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
2k views

When does the sheaf cohomology of a topological space vanish?

The question is in the title. A more precise formulation is: Let $X$ be a topological space. When does $H^i(X,F) = 0$ for all $i > 0$ and all abelian sheaves $F$ on $X$? The obvious example is a ...
anon's user avatar
  • 281
10 votes
1 answer
719 views

Leray-Hirsch theorem for Dolbeault cohomology

In Bott and Tu's Differential forms in algebraic topology there is a proof of Leray-Hirsch for the De Rham cohomology. The theorem is this: Theorem (Leray-Hirsch): Let $E$ be a fiber bundle over $M$...
Max Reinhold Jahnke's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
963 views

intuition about perverse sheaves

firstly, I would know if my very basic intuition on perverse sheaves is correct . secondly, I would have some clarification in what perverse sheaves behaves better than regular sheaves . my intuition ...
Amos Kaminski's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
186 views

Countability assumption for good covers in Bott-Tu

In chapter II of their text Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Bott and Tu construct the Čech-De Rham complex with regards to an open covering indexed by some ordered and countable indexing set....
Amueller's user avatar
  • 253
9 votes
2 answers
4k views

Top cohomology detecting compactness

I am looking for a reference for the fact that the top cohomology $H^n(X;A)$ of an $n$-dimensional manifold $X$ is non-trivial precisely when $X$ is compact. I tried to ask this question on Math....
Earthliŋ's user avatar
  • 1,211
9 votes
4 answers
3k views

Is there a (satisfying) proof that cellular cohomology is isomorphic to simplicial cohomology that doesn't use relative cohomlogy?

That singular and de Rham cohomologies of a smooth manifold are isomorphic has two proofs that I know of. The classical one uses Stokes' theorem to give the isomorphism explicitly. The second proof ...
Makhalan Duff's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
1k views

Do the cohomology groups of the structure sheaf of a smooth resolution depend on the resolution?

Let $X$ be an affine variety. Let $Y$ be smooth and let the map $f\colon Y\rightarrow X$ be proper birational. We will call $Y$ a smooth resolution of $X$. Do the cohomology groups $H^i(Y,\mathcal{O}...
clementine's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
1k views

Construction of generalized Eilenberg-MacLane spaces

The Eilenberg-MacLane spaces $K(G,q)$ are readily generalized to study cohomology with local coefficients.The generalized Eilenberg-MacLane space $K_{\pi}(G,q)$ are spaces with only two nnvanishing ...
Xiaoyu Li's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
2k views

Sheaf cohomology with compact supports (and Verdier duality?)

Consider a manifold and a complex where cochains are sections of vector bundles and coboundary maps are differential operators, which are locally exact except in lowest degree (think de Rham complex). ...
Igor Khavkine's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
509 views

Deducing properness from $H^i(X, \mathcal{F})$ finitely generated over $\Gamma(O_X)$

Suppose that $X$ is a quasi-projective variety over a field $k$ and that we further know that for every coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$, $H^i(X,\mathcal{F})$ is finitely generated over $\Gamma(O_X)$. Is ...
Daniel Pomerleano's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
475 views

Using higher topos theory to study Cech cohomology

It seems to me that many classical statements about Cech cohomology should without much effort follow from Lurie's HTT, but I am struggling to fill out the details. I want to show that, given an ...
Markus Zetto's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
571 views

In terms of sheaf cohomology, what does Bott & Tu's relative de Rham cohomology $H^\bullet(f)$ compute for $f: S \to M$ a smooth map?

Given a map $f: S \to M$ of smooth manifolds, Bott & Tu define on page 78 a complex by $\Omega^q(f)=\Omega^q(M) \oplus \Omega^{q-1}(S)$ and $d(\omega, \theta)=(d\omega, f^*\omega - d\theta)$ where ...
ಠ_ಠ's user avatar
  • 6,025
8 votes
2 answers
684 views

Is $H^i(X,F)$ finitely generated over $\Gamma(O_X)$ if $F$ is coherent?

Suppose $\mathcal{X}$ is a smooth quasi-projective variety over $\mathbb{C}$ (I apologize if these hypotheses have little to do with the question at hand). Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $\...
Daniel Pomerleano's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
2k views

Cohomology of Grothendieck topology

My naïve cartoon picture of the construction of étale cohomology is this: start with a scheme, associate to it a Grothendieck topology (making a site). A functor from the Grothendieck topology to ...
Stefan Witzel's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
623 views

Can one determine the trace map for a nonsingular projective variety explicitly?

I've never understood how one would actually go about computing a trace map associated with the canonical sheaf on a smooth projective variety, if it's even possible. Hartshorne proves that the ...
forget this's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

What are the uses of coefficient systems for arithmetic cohomology theories?

In topology when studying a space with non-trivial fundamental group it becomes important to consider homology and cohomology with coefficients in representations of the fundamental group, i.e. local ...
user50948's user avatar
  • 183
8 votes
1 answer
289 views

Injective model structure on sheaves of bounded complexes of $A$-modules

The following might be very well known for people who works with model categories, but I do not find the answer. Let $A$-be a ring. Denote $\mathbf{Ch}_+(A)$ the category of positive degree cochain ...
Tintin's user avatar
  • 2,871
8 votes
1 answer
506 views

Does the sheaf $\mathcal{O}^*$ on a complex manifold have an acyclic cover?

Let $X$ be a complex manifold and let $\mathcal{O}^*$ be the sheaf nonvanishing holomorphic functions on it. Does it have an acyclic cover? That is, a cover for which all open sets and all ...
Josh Lackman's user avatar
  • 1,198
8 votes
1 answer
394 views

Independence of embedding for higher sheaf cohomology of local cohomology on projective space

Suppose $Y$ is a projective variety over a field $k$. Fix an embedding $\iota: Y \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}^n_k$ for some $n$, and consider the local cohomology sheaves $\mathcal{H}^j_Y(\omega_{\...
Nick Switala's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
356 views

An explicit isomorphism between the 1st Cech cohomology and the 1st hypercohomology

Let $\mathbf{X}$ be a Grothendieck topos and let $A$ be an abelian group in $\mathbf{X}$. Verdier's Theorem allows one to describe $\mathrm{H}^n(\mathbf{X},A)$ in terms of hypercoverings, namely, as ...
Uriya First's user avatar
  • 2,928
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

Relative version of de Rham cohomology with local coefficients

Given a vector bundle $E \to M$ with connection $\nabla$, we get a twisted de Rham sequence using the exterior covariant derivative: $$\mathcal{E} \xrightarrow{d^\nabla=\nabla} \Omega^1_M \otimes_{\...
ಠ_ಠ's user avatar
  • 6,025
8 votes
0 answers
647 views

Trying to understand "Shtukas"

I'm studying Goss' Basic structures of function field Arithmetic, chapter 6 about Shtukas. I'm trying to understand some details about some concepts. This chapter is based on a Mumford's paper An ...
MChocko's user avatar
  • 69
8 votes
0 answers
257 views

Global functions on a product of schemes over artinian ring

For a morphism of schemes $f:X\to S$ with $S=\text{Spec}(R)$ affine, let's write $A(X)=H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$. I'm interested in the morphism of $R$-algebras $$ c:A(X)\otimes_R A(Y)\to A(X\times_SY) $$ ...
Matthieu Romagny's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
588 views

Can we use sheaf cohomology to say anything interesting for vector bundles with non-flat connections?

Given a vector bundle $E \to M$ with connection $\nabla$, we get a twisted de Rham sequence using the exterior covariant derivative: $$0 \to \mathcal{E} \xrightarrow{d^\nabla} \Omega^1_M \otimes \...
ಠ_ಠ's user avatar
  • 6,025
8 votes
0 answers
370 views

Dualizing complex of the product of two locally compact spaces

Hello! In the setting of locally compact Hausdorff spaces, I would like to understand the relation between the exterior product ${\mathbb D}_X\boxtimes{\mathbb D}_Y$ of the dualizing complexes of two ...
Hanno's user avatar
  • 2,756

1
2 3 4 5
8