Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Ehresmann connections; covariant derivatives; connections on vector bundles, principal bundles, ∞-bundles, submersions, bundle gerbes; holonomy and higher holonomy; parallel transport; torsion; curvature. See also the tags [principal-bundles], [vector-bundles], [gerbes], [curvature], [geodesics], [characteristic-classes], [torsion].
6
votes
Commutative/ symmetric second covariant derivative
If the second covariant derivative of every vector field $Z$ is symmetric in the sense that $\nabla(\nabla Z)$ (which is a section of $TM\otimes T^*M\otimes T^*M$) is a section of the sub bundle $TM\o …
3
votes
Obstructions to the existence of a flat connection on a vector bundle
A slightly different point of view for answering this question is the following one:
First, if $M$ is simply connected, then $E\to M$ admits a flat connection if and only if $E$ is trivial, so in this …
3
votes
Accepted
Homogeneous metric connections on 3-dimensional Lie groups
This is something of an exercise is unwinding the definitions, but there's an interesting twist to it as well, so here's an outline of an answer:
Let $G$ be a connected $3$-dimensional Lie group (not …
5
votes
Accepted
If any two triangles of equal area can be mapped via affine maps, what can we say about the ...
Using the structure equations, it is not difficult to show that, if $f:(M,g)\to(N,h)$ is a diffeomorphism of (not necessarily complete) connected surfaces that is affine in the OP's sense, i.e., $\nab …
50
votes
What is the Levi-Civita connection trying to describe?
Remark on connections with the same geodesics:
I realize that I didn't respond to the OP's confusion about connections with the same geodesics vs. compatible with a metric $g$ but with torsion. … \quad \square
$$
Finally, we examine when two $g$-compatible connections have the same geodesics:
Lemma 3: If $g$ is a nondegenerate (pseudo-)Riemannian metric, and $\nabla$ and $\nabla^*$ are linear connections …
9
votes
Accepted
A consequence of Ambrose-Singer theorem on holonomy
Your first question is a bit ambiguous. Are you asking whether, for each $p\in U$, the matrices $S_k(p)$ span the Lie algebra of $\mathrm{Hol}^0_p(\nabla)$ or are you asking whether, after taking the …
3
votes
Accepted
Problem arising in metrizability of connections: Simultaneously skewsymmetrizing matrices
I will assume, though you didn't say, that the ground field is $\mathbb{R}$. (For all I know, the argument below might fail when the ground field is finite, etc.)
Yes, when $n>2$, it works for $m > …
7
votes
Accepted
Does $\nabla g=\omega(\cdot) g$ imply $\nabla$ is metric w.r.t a conformal rescaling of $g$?
The answer is 'no'. For example, just take $M$ to be $\mathbb{R}^n$ (for $n>1$), and $E = M\times \mathbb{R}^r$ for some $r>1$. Let $\omega$ be any $1$-form on $M$, and define a connection $\nabla$ …
7
votes
Accepted
The automorphism group of a symplectic symmetric space
The affine group of $(M,\nabla)$ is a Lie group $G$ by Kobayashi's theorem that shows that the automorphism group of any affine connection is a Lie group (see Kobayashi and Nomizu's Foundations of Dif …
6
votes
Accepted
Left invariant connections on a Lie group
Yes. Just take the Levi-Civita connection of any left-invariant Riemannian metric on the Lie group. The metric is complete, so any two points can be joined by a geodesic (Hopf-Rinow). Thus, the geo …
6
votes
Accepted
The bundle of symmetric affine connections as quotient of the second-order frame bundle
It's easy to check (in local coordinates) that this mapping from connections to sections of the given bundle has all of the desired properties. … Then, in a natural way, the space of affine connections is identified with the sections of $J^1(F^*(M))/\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})$, while the space of torsion-free affine connections is identified with …
15
votes
Accepted
Locally Riemannian Connection
(The connections $\nabla_i$ are equal outside the union of the interiors of $D_1$ and $D_2$.) Then $\nabla$ is not the Levi-Civita connection of any metric on $\mathbb{R}^2$. … Note that the above example shows that the condition of being locally Riemannian is not a closed condition on germs of torsion-free connections in the plane (since it can hold on the complement of a point …
13
votes
Riemannian vs Non-Riemannian curvature
NB: In what follows, to save typing, I will be working on a manifold $M$, but I will write $T$, $T^*$, etc. to denote the bundles $TM$, $T^*M$, etc. and let $M$ be understood.
It seems that the OP w …
7
votes
Accepted
Is there such a connection on the punctured plane?
Yes. Take the Levi-Civita connection of any conformal metric $g = e^{2u}(dx^2+dy^2)$ of positive curvature, say. Then, by (local) Gauss-Bonnet, the holonomy around any smooth closed loop $\gamma$ is …
6
votes
Accepted
How large can the cone of $\nabla$-compatible metrics be?
The $\nabla$-compatible metrics on $E$ are the positive-definite $\nabla'$-parallel sections of $S^2(E^*)$, where $\nabla'$ is the connection on $S^2(E^*)$ induced by $\nabla$. When $M$ is connected …