Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
25 votes
3 answers
3k views

Understanding zeta function regularization

I attended a talk this morning on Ray-Singer torsion, in which Rafael Siejakowski introduced zeta function regularization in a compelling way. The goal is to define the determinant of a positive self-...
Daniel Moskovich's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
597 views

lower bound for $\Re\zeta(1+it)$

Hi is there any lower bound for $\Re\zeta(1+it)$. I did try with computer until some ordinate and I saw $\Re\zeta(1+it)>0$. If it is true, is there any reference to prove it. thanks
asd's user avatar
  • 163
16 votes
1 answer
2k views

Why is the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function equivalent to the Poisson summation formula?

We can derive from the Poisson summation formula the modularity of the Theta function, which results in the functional equation. In his book on the Riemann Zeta function, Patterson mentions also that ...
Marc Palm's user avatar
  • 11.2k
2 votes
1 answer
1k views

What is the Stirling formula for x(x+1)(x+2)...(x+n-1)?

Let x be a complex number. What is the Stirling formula for x(x+1)(x+2)...(x+n-1) when n goes to infinity?
7-adic's user avatar
  • 3,804
9 votes
2 answers
1k views

On rational functions with rational power series

Let $f(z)=\sum_{n\geq 0}a_n z^n$ be a Taylor series with rational coefficients with infinitely non-zero $a_n$ which converges in a small neighboorhood around $0$. Furthermore, assume that \begin{...
Hugo Chapdelaine's user avatar
24 votes
4 answers
8k views

What does log convexity mean?

The Bohr–Mollerup theorem characterizes the Gamma function $\Gamma(x)$ as the unique function $f(x)$ on the positive reals such that $f(1)=1$, $f(x+1)=xf(x)$, and $f$ is logarithmically convex, i.e. $\...
Stopple's user avatar
  • 11.1k
14 votes
6 answers
1k views

Consequence of equidistribution or not?

Let $\theta \not\in \mathbb{Q}$. We know that $(n\theta)_{n \geq 1}$ is equidistributed modulo 1. Let $\epsilon_n = \mathrm{sign}\bigl(\sin(n\pi \theta)\bigr)$ and $S_N= \sum_{n=1}^N \epsilon_n$. I'...
Portland's user avatar
  • 2,829
4 votes
2 answers
1k views

Product over the primes

I'm trying to estimate the product $$\prod_{p\lt q\lt r\lt s}1-\frac{24}{(pqrs)^2}$$ where $p,q,r,s$ are primes. This is for the purpose of calculating the density of Sloane's A070284 [1]. The idea ...
Charles's user avatar
  • 9,114
7 votes
2 answers
948 views

Uniform variant of Stirling's approximation

Stirling's formula is usually stated in the form $\log \Gamma(s) = (s-\frac12) \log{s} - s + \log\sqrt{2\pi} + E(s)$, where $E(s) = c_1/s + c_2/s^2 + \dots + O(s^{-K})$ for certain absolute ...
Matt Young's user avatar
  • 4,671
1 vote
1 answer
613 views

What is the value of the regularized incomplete beta function at x=0.5?

What is $I_{0.5}(a,b)$ where I is the regularized incomplete beta function?
Neil's user avatar
  • 598
7 votes
1 answer
446 views

at which rational points does the Hypergeometric function take rational values

A generic example is ${}_2 F_1(\frac{1}{3},\frac{2}{3},\frac{5}{6};\frac{27}{32})=\frac{8}{5}$. So my question: Is there any description of the set of rational points at which the hypergeometric ...
John's user avatar
  • 605
22 votes
9 answers
3k views

When does the zeta function take on integer values?

Here $\zeta(s)$ is the usual Riemann zeta function, defined as $\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s}$ for $\Re(s)>1$. Let $A_n=${$s\;:\;\zeta(s)=n$}. The behaviour of $A_0$ is basically just the Riemann ...
Thomas Bloom's user avatar
  • 7,013
18 votes
2 answers
3k views

Zeta-function regularization of determinants and traces

The short answer to my question may be a pointer to the right text. I will give all the background I know, and then ask my questions in list form. Let A be an operator (on an infinite-dimensional ...
Theo Johnson-Freyd's user avatar

1
2