Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 317

The study of differentiable manifolds and differentiable maps. One fundamental problem is that of classifying manifolds up to diffeomorphism. Differential topology is what Poincaré understood as topology or “analysis situs”.

5 votes
Accepted

Extending diffeomorphisms between surfaces

The way you phrased this makes it sound harder than it is. Your two surfaces are diffeomorphic, so we can identify them both with a single surface $M$. Do this in a way that reflects the identificat …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
8 votes
Accepted

Linking number and intersection number

$\DeclareMathOperator\tX{\widetilde{X}}\DeclareMathOperator\tB{\widetilde{B}}\DeclareMathOperator\tD{\widetilde{D}}\DeclareMathOperator\Z{\mathbb{Z}}$ In fact, $B$ must intersect $D$ at least $|\text{ …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
3 votes

Classification of surface bundles over surfaces

About 6 years ago there was an Oberwolfach meeting on surface bundles, and most of the talks were recorded and can be seen here. If I remember correctly, Benson Farb’s overview talk was particularly …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
21 votes
Accepted

Manifolds with two coordinate charts

I'll only discuss the first question (EDIT: Actually, I address the second question at the end). As Agol pointed out in the comments, for $n \geq 5$ this is an easy consequence of Newman's 1966 proof …
C.F.G's user avatar
  • 4,195
12 votes

Conceptual proof of classification of surfaces?

The proof of Zeeman described in this note is by a substantial margin the easiest and most conceptual proof I know. To simplify the exposition I restrict to orientable surfaces in the note, but it is …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
17 votes
Accepted

Foliation of $\mathbb R^n$ by connected compact manifolds

There does not, even if you don’t require the fiber and base to be manifolds (or even connected, just that $F$ is not a single point). See Borel, Armand; Serre, Jean-Pierre, Impossibilité de fibrer …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
11 votes
Accepted

Do an unlinked trefoil and figure-eight cobound an annulus in $B^4$?

The relationship you're asking for is called concordance. Determining if knots are concordant is quite difficult: there are many concordance invariants, but no kind of global picture of what it means …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
13 votes

Fundamental groups of compact Kähler manifolds

It is still open whether or not all Kahler groups occur as the fundamental groups of smooth complex projective varieties. However, there has been some interesting work on which groups can occur as th …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
16 votes
Accepted

Who proved that two homotopic embeddings of one surface in another are isotopic?

First, for simple closed curves, this was known long before Freedman-Hass-Scott. For closed surfaces, it was first proved by Baer in Baer, R., Kurventypen auf Flächen. J. reine angew. Math., 156 (19 …
Dario's user avatar
  • 683
12 votes

Is $\mathrm{Diff}_0(S_g)$ torsion-free?

This theorem was proved by Hurwitz in the 19th century, who in fact showed the stronger theorem (also mentioned in Danny Ruberman's answer) that any finite-order diffeomorphism of a surface of genus …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
19 votes

Exotic $C^k$ manifolds

There are no such exotic manifolds. Whitney proved in Whitney, Hassler Differentiable manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 37 (1936), no. 3, 645–680. that every $C^1$-differential structure can be uniquely …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
19 votes
Accepted

When a homeomorphism is a diffeomorphism w.r.t to a suitable smooth structure?

Let me first answer your last question in the negative: there exist homeomorphisms $f:M \rightarrow M$ of smoothable manifolds $M$ such that neither $f$ nor $f^{-1}$ are smooth with respect to any smo …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
17 votes
Accepted

Existence of sections of the evaluation map for the diffeomorphism group

If a section $\sigma : M \rightarrow \text{Diff}_{+}(M)$ to $\text{Diff}_{+}(M) \rightarrow M$ exists, then $M$ must be parallelizable (i.e. the tangent bundle of $M$ must be trivial). Indeed, if $\v …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
15 votes

Extending a diffeomorphism of the sphere $S^2$ to the ball $D^3$

Smale's proof is actually pretty simple and geometric -- I highly recommend reading his paper. There's also a beautiful short proof of Smale's theorem using the measurable Riemann mapping theorem in …
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k
10 votes

Can cotangent bundles see exotic smooth structures?

The answer to your second question is yes (in some cases). See Abouzaid's paper "Framed bordism and Lagrangian embeddings of exotic spheres", available here.
Andy Putman's user avatar
  • 44.8k

15 30 50 per page