Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Diophantine equations, rational points, abelian varieties, Arakelov theory, Iwasawa theory.
1
vote
Changing the weight space for an eigenvariety
I think this question is based on a misconception. “Being an eigenvariety” isn’t a rigorously defined property of a space (or map of spaces) which you could prove to hold or to not hold. It’s more lik …
6
votes
Accepted
Evidence for the equivariant BSD conjecture with higher multiplicity
You might want to study the work of Darmon--Lauder--Rotger, notably this paper: https://web.mat.upc.edu/victor.rotger/docs/DLR1.pdf
They study cases of the equivariant BSD conjecture where $\rho$ is a …
5
votes
Accepted
Bounding $H^4_{\text{ėt}}$ of a surface
Are you absolutely sure you want to compute $p$-adic etale cohomology for a smooth proper $\mathbb{Z}[1/S]$-scheme with $p \notin S$, so $p$ is not invertible on $X$? This will be painful, and I stron …
2
votes
Kernel of restriction in étale cohomology of curves over number fields
Even for 0-dimensional varieties over number fields, the statement of Poitou–Tate duality is much more subtle than this: it's not enough just to compare the kernels of base-extension to $\overline{K}$ …
7
votes
How is Taylor-Wiles patching "horizontal Iwasawa theory"?
I think your question already contains its own answer.
In classical, "vertical" Iwasawa theory one studies class groups, or other arithetic widgets like elliptic curve Selmer groups, in a limit over $ …
2
votes
Accepted
Variants of the classical Satake classfication
(1) Borel's article in the Corvallis proceedings does this slightly differently: he chooses a specific Frobenius element $\sigma$, and then looks at the subset $\widehat{G} \times \{\sigma\}$ of ${}^L …
6
votes
Accepted
Cohomology of Shimura varieties before and after completion at some prime
Yes, this is true. It works with arbitrary algebraic varieties, no need to be specific to Shimura varieties.
Let $X \to^{\pi} Spec(K)$ be an algebraic variety, $\mathcal{F}$ an etale sheaf on $X$, and …
5
votes
p-adic L functions from Selmer groups - how canonical are they?
All of your questions are undermined by the same fundamental issue: you cannot talk about "the" p-adic $L$-function in this generality, because there is no sensible definition of what a $p$-adic $L$-f …
18
votes
Are some congruence subgroups better than others?
This question already has multiple nice answers, but I am going to add one more thing which isn't quite covered by the existing posts.
One distinctive advantage of the $\Gamma_0(N)$ and $\Gamma_1(N)$ …
10
votes
Accepted
Definition of modular curve associated to $\Gamma(N)$
This is a subtle issue (which has come up before on this site several times, see e.g. is the modular curve X(N) defined over Q? for a related question).
Your $S(N)$ is naturally a scheme over $\mathbb …
13
votes
Accepted
Definition of locally symmetric space of reductive groups
There is a very natural, intrinsic definition of a "symmetric space", as a manifold (Riemannian or Hermitian) with an extra symmetry of a certain prescribed type. It is then a theorem, not a definitio …
13
votes
Accepted
Do people prefer working on $\mathrm{GSp}$ and $\mathrm{GU}$ rather than $\mathrm{Sp}$ and $...
Symplectic case: Here are two reasons (not necessarily the only ones) why $\operatorname{GSp}_{2n}$ is more convenient to work with than $\operatorname{Sp}_{2n}$.
Firstly: there is no Shimura datum w …
3
votes
Accepted
Upper bound of the analytic rank of the modular Jacobian varieties $J_1(N)$
I remember discussing this with Emmanuel Kowalski not long ago. The short answer is that generalising the result to $J_1(N)$ is an open problem, and seems to be very difficult.
2
votes
Accepted
Why does $[I](P)=0$ ($P\in E$) imply $[\psi(I)](P)=0$ ? ($\psi$ is Hecke character of ellipt...
This is essentially the same as your other recent CM-theory question, in a mild disguise; for both questions the point is that $\psi(I)$ is a generator of $I$. This follows easily from the fact that $ …
12
votes
Simple motivation to study arithmetic geometry
Let $n$ be a prime number which has remainder 5 or 7 on division by 8. Then there exists a right-angled triangle with integer side lengths whose area is $n$ times a square.
This is a theorem of Paul M …