Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

Questions about abstract measure and Lebesgue integral theory. Also concerns such properties as measurability of maps and sets.

9 votes

Every function on reals a sum of two surjective real functions?

The answer is yes. Theorem. Every function $f:\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}\R\to\R$ is the sum of two surjective functions, $f=g+h$. Indeed, we can find such $g$ and $h$ that are surjective on every nontr …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
27 votes
Accepted

Writing a function on $\mathbb{R}$ as a sum of two injections

The answer is yes. Every function on the reals is the sum of two injective functions, and this can be done in a highly effective manner, constructing the two functions $g,h$ from $f$ without any need …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
7 votes

Is "the purely probabilistic version of Freiling's axiom of symmetry" disprovable in ZFC?

This is not a full answer, but let me just point out that the statement is relatively consistent both with CH and also with $\neg$CH. CH implies the statement, since we can take $S$ to be the (convers …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
92 votes
3 answers
14k views

Is every sigma-algebra the Borel algebra of a topology?

This question arises from the excellent question posed on math.SE by Salvo Tringali, namely, Correspondence between Borel algebras and topology. Since the question was not answered there after some ti …
3 votes
Accepted

What is the measure of two sets which partition the reals into subsets of positive measure?

We can make those limits be any two positive numbers that add to $1$, or we can make them nonconvergent. The reason is that in any interval, we can construct $A$ and $B$ on that interval by using the …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Definable collections of non measurable sets of reals

(Edit.) With a closer reading of your question, I see that you asked for a very specific notion of definability. If you allow the family to have size larger than continuum, there is a trivial Yes answ …
C7X's user avatar
  • 2,031
8 votes
Accepted

Is it known that there is any function $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ at all, whose graph has p...

The answer is yes. We construct $f$ by transfinite recursion using a well ordering of the reals. (So this may not be explicit enough for you.) In fact, we can make the function $f$ bijective, with the …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

How to prove that the Lebesgue $\sigma$-Algebra is not countably generated?

Let me mount the kind of cardinality argument to which you allude. You had asked for a proof that the $\sigma$-algebra of Lebesgue measurable sets is not countably generated. But in fact, a much stron …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
23 votes
Accepted

Within ZFC, is $2^{\aleph_0}<2^{\aleph_1}$ provable/independent?

The assertion that $2^{\aleph_0}=2^{\aleph_1}$ is known as Luzin's hypothesis, and was presented by Luzin as an alternative to Cantor's continuum hypothesis. This is now known to be independent of ZFC …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Why surreal numbers cannot be extended further in this way using measure approach?

Such an approach will violate the Cantor-Hume principle, which asserts that "the number of elements" of a set $A$ should be invariant under equinumorsity. That is, if $A$ and $B$ can be placed into on …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
25 votes

Axiom of choice and non-measurable set

No, the existence of a non-Lebesgue measurable set does not imply the axiom of choice. If ZF is consistent, then set-theorists can construct models of ZF having a non-Lebesgue measurable set, but stil …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
10 votes

Is there a measure theory for proper classes?

One might hope to handle proper classes as objects by working in one of the standard second-order set theories. For example, there is Gödel–Bernays set theory GBC, which has classes as objects, and in …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
9 votes
Accepted

Supremum of infimum of measure of members of a free ultrafilter

The answer is: zero. The reason is that every ultrafilter has zero as the infimum of the upper density of its members. To see this, observe that if a set $U$ is in the ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$, with …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
18 votes
Accepted

Existence of probability measure defined on all subsets

The existence of such a measure is equiconsistent to the existence of a measurable cardinal, one of the large cardinal notions, and if ZFC is consistent, cannot be proved in ZFC. (See the notion of re …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Ordered measurable spaces

This can fail, even if you assume that the lower cones of the order are measurable with respect to the algebra $\Sigma$. For example, consider the real numbers $X=\mathbb{R}$ and let $\Sigma$ be the u …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
15 30 50 per page