Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

Philosophical aspects of logic and set theory; truth status of mathematical axioms; Philosophy of Mathematics; philosophical aspects of mathematics in general; relation of mathematics to philosophy; etc. Consider also posting at http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/, where philosophy-of-mathematics is one of the most popular tags.

13 votes

Essential reads in the philosophy of mathematics and set theory

Last fall I taught a course in the Philosophy of Set Theory at NYU and you can find the reading list available on my web page. This course was more narrowly focused on the question of realism and plur …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
24 votes

Is platonism regarding arithmetic consistent with the multiverse view in set theory?

The view you are suggesting is something close to what is held by Solomon Feferman, who holds that the objects and truths of arithmetic have a definite nature that is not shared when one moves up to h …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
19 votes
Accepted

What governs our "perception?" about the platonic realm of sets?

The recent developments on the consistency of NF bring welcome closure to the longstanding open question about whether NF was consistent. And this is naturally a very important matter for those who fi …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Concept of bedrock and mantle in the multiverse view in the philosophy of mathematics

The confusion seems to arise from your statement "the mantle of $V$ which is the smallest ground for $V$." But this not quite right. In a bottomless model of ZFC, the mantle is not a ground. It is the …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
11 votes

Silver's approach to the inconsistency of $\mathrm{ZFC}$

When I was a graduate student at Berkeley in the early 90s, I had heard that Silver's approach to refuting ZFC involved the idea that somehow we make a mistake in our thinking about ZFC by conflating …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
43 votes
Accepted

Why hasn't mereology succeeded as an alternative to set theory?

I have long found this question interesting, and in some recent joint work with Makoto Kikuchi, now available, we consider various aspects of the question of whether a set-theoretic version of mereolo …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
148 votes
Accepted

Nontrivial theorems with trivial proofs

Bertrand Russell proved that the general set-formation principle known as the Comprehension Principle, which asserts that for any property $\varphi$ one may form the set $\lbrace\ x \mid \varphi(x)\ \ …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
72 votes

Nontrivial theorems with trivial proofs

Cantor proved that the set of real numbers is uncountable---it cannot be put in bijective correspondence with the natural numbers---but the proof is a simple diagonalization: if the real numbers could …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
8 votes

Mathematical analysis of Lewisian concepts, esp. natural properties

I have engaged with the Lewis-style set-theoretic mereology in a few papers, undertaken jointly with Makoto Kikuchi. My interest in this topic was inspired originally by a MathOverflow question, Why h …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
23 votes
Accepted

Are the categories of sets, abelian groups, and commutative rings unique?

Introduction to pluralism A version of this question lies at the heart of the ongoing dispute on pluralism in the philosophy of mathematics. Is there at bottom just one mathematical reality? Does ever …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
241 votes
Accepted

Is the analysis as taught in universities in fact the analysis of definable numbers?

The concept of definable real number, although seemingly easy to reason with at first, is actually laden with subtle metamathematical dangers to which both your question and the Wikipedia article to w …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
2 votes

Quantification over uncountable sets

There are several things one can say. The theory of ZFC without powerset is often denoted by $\newcommand\ZFCm{\text{ZFC}^-}\ZFCm$. One has to be a little careful with what it means, since collection …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
12 votes

Abstract thought vs calculation

Arguments by mathematical induction seem to provide an entire class of examples of the phenomenon, where computation is replaced by a higher level of reasoning. With induction, one uses a comparativel …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
14 votes

Physics and Church–Turing Thesis

There is a body of literature on the topic of supertasks, which are computational tasks involving infinitely many steps. A large part of this work involves a purely mathematical analysis and developme …
David Roberts's user avatar
  • 35.5k
21 votes

Siegel zeros and other "illusory worlds": building theories around hypotheses believed to be...

I believe that there are many instances of this phenomenon in set theory, where an elaborate theory is developed over a period of years by many people, even though the theory is not viewed ultimately …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

15 30 50 per page