Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

Questions tagged [new-foundations]

New Foundations is the axiomatic set theory in Quine's 1937 article "New Foundations for Mathematical Logic"; it simplifies the theory of types of Principia Mathematica.

0
votes
0answers
230 views

Is there a known shorter axiomatization of NF than this?

Is there an already known axiomtization of $NF$ that is shorter than the following axiomatic system in first order logic with equality $``="$ and membership $``\in"$? And what is exactly meant by ...
2
votes
1answer
459 views

Is there anything against this function j being injective?

Language (first order logic with equality "$=$" and membership "$\in$", and constant symbol "$j$") Axiom: ID axioms + There exists a set $A$, such that: Field: $\forall x \in j \ \exists a \in A \ \...
1
vote
0answers
31 views

What is the proof in NFU+|Ur|>|Set| of having less sets of sets than sets of Ur-elements?

Working in $\text{NFU}$, let $Ur$ be the set of all empty objects except a specific empty object $\emptyset$ that stands as the empty set, let $Set$ be the set of all non empty objects and $\emptyset$....
4
votes
1answer
187 views

Intersection of iterated powerset in NFU

I am interested in the existence of the set $\bigcap_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \mathcal{P}^n(x)$ for any given set $x$, in the context of NFU (New Foundations with Urelements). It seems to me that the ...
5
votes
1answer
234 views

What drawbacks are there to using NF(U) for category theory?

In category theory, you often run into what is known as "size" issues. That is, you run into the issue that the categories you try to define are too "big" to be sets, and so you need to use classes or ...
19
votes
1answer
1k views

Can you have a type theory where there is type of all types?

Normally in a type theory, you can not have a type of all types, due to Girad's paradox. This is somewhat similar to how in set theory, you cannot have a set of all sets. Therefore, usually you just ...
2
votes
1answer
259 views

Anti-foundational set theory with a universal set

There are alternative set theories that allow for a universal set, e.g. NF(U), positive set theory and and topological set theory. There are also alternative set theories like ZFA that allow for the ...
4
votes
0answers
398 views

New foundation in homotopy type theory

Is there any model of NF (New Foundations) on HoTT (homotopy type theory)? Because there is a model of ZF(C) on HoTT (The HoTT book, Section 10.5) and NF on ZFC (by this Wikipedia articile), I think ...
12
votes
0answers
433 views

Large cardinals arising from alternate set theories

My question is whether there are model-theoretic large cardinal axioms associated with $NFU$ - or more generally, with set theories other than $ZFC$. Large cardinal properties generally come in one ...
3
votes
2answers
611 views

Are descriptive and ontological notions of equality equal? [closed]

‎Let ‎$‎‎a$ ‎and ‎‎$‎‎b$ ‎are ‎two "‎objects". ‎What ‎is ‎the ‎meaning ‎of‎ ‎‎$a=b‎‎$‎? This is one of the deepest problems of philosophy and logic because one needs a complete information about "...
1
vote
0answers
244 views

Is there a non-trivial consistency preserving transformation?

In ‎set ‎theory ‎"equiconsistency" (and not "consistency") ‎of ‎the ‎theories ‎is the‎ ‎main ‎part ‎of ‎researches. ‎So ‎we ‎usually ‎try ‎to ‎construct a‎ ‎new model ‎using a‎ ‎given ‎one. ‎In ‎the ‎...
13
votes
3answers
1k views

Where is the end of universe?

In some sense the empty set ($\emptyset$) and the global set of all sets ($G$) are the ends of the universe of mathematical objects. The world which $ZFC$ describes has an end from the bottom and is ...
8
votes
2answers
445 views

Definitions of ordinal besides von Neumann & Frege-Russel?

So my Google-fu didn't show any references on this. I'm studying an obscure set theory (ML, a variation on NF with proper classes) and it seems to not deal well with the standard definitions of ...
0
votes
4answers
474 views

Consistency of the concept of the collection of all collection

By Russel's paradox, we know that the concept of the set of all sets is inconsistent. Similarly, if classes have only sets as members, the concept of the class of all classes is inconsistent because ...
10
votes
2answers
553 views

Constructible models of New Foundations?

Hi all! Is there anything like Gödel's constructible universe for New Foundations? More precisely, I would like a process for taking a model $M$ of NF, and using it to build a model $L \subseteq M$ ...
17
votes
7answers
2k views

Understanding Specker's disproof of the axiom of choice in New Foundations

Hi all! I am trying to understand Specker (1953)'s proof (found here) that the axiom of choice is false in New Foundations. I am stuck on the following point. At 3.5 Specker writes: 3.5. The cardinal ...
8
votes
1answer
578 views

A question about Quine's set theory NF.

This question might not really be considered appropriate for mathoverflow.net but I'll risk asking it and apologize in advance if I have commited a booboo. It is often said that in NF one can prove ...
5
votes
1answer
384 views

In search of a set theory with specific properties

I'm in search of a set theory that satisfies the following requirements. There is a universal set $V$ such that $\forall x(x \in V)$. So for example, $V \in V$. Sets whose elements are 'large' exist. ...
3
votes
0answers
394 views

New Foundations and weaker forms of choice

New Foundations (introduced by Quine) proves that $AC$ is false. Out of curiosity, is $NF$ consistent with countable choice or dependent choice? What's the strongest consequence of choice still ...
19
votes
5answers
3k views

How much of ZFC does Quine's New Foundations prove?

Main Question: Does anyone know of a reference that can tell me which axioms of ZFC Quine's New Foundations prove, disprove, and leave undecided? Secondary Question: I've read that diagonal ...
0
votes
2answers
528 views

Limiting set theory using symmetry

[Cross-posted from here] If my understanding is correct, naive set theory needs to be restricted in order to avoid paradoxes including the Russell paradox. Typically, the restriction is expressed in ...