Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result.
11
votes
Dehn's solution to Hilbert's 3rd: 1901 or 1902?
Another point to consider is whether "Über den Rauminhalt"
is in fact Dehn's first solution to Hilbert's 3rd Problem. I
believe his first solution was in the paper "Über raumgleiche
Polyeder" in the N …
7
votes
Accepted
Reference request for two-generator subgroups of a free group
By Nielsen-Schreier, the subgroup $F$ of $F_2$ generated by $x$ and $y$ is free.
Since $x$ and $y$ do not commute, $F$ is not the free group of rank 1, so it must
contain a free group of rank 2
7
votes
Do there exist groups with word problems in arbitrary P-degrees?
I think the question is also answered positively by the main result in a paper of
mine -- Efficient computation in groups and simplicial complexes.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 276 (1983), no. 2, 715–727 …
18
votes
4
answers
5k
views
The only great book that Bourbaki ever wrote?
OK, the title is opinionated and contentious, but I have a definite
question. I know that the title refers to the Bourbaki volume
Groupes et Algèbres de Lie (Chapters 4-6), published in 1968, but
…
5
votes
Good books on theory of distributions
For a really gentle introduction I would recommend
Kolmogorov and Fomin's Introductory Real Analysis,
available as a Dover paperback. They have a nice
introduction to distributions as "generalized fu …
6
votes
Comprehensive reference for synthetic euclidean geometry
As Andrew L has mentioned, Hartshorne's book Geometry: Euclid and Beyond
is very good. If you really want a comprehensive book (for yourself, not for the children you teach) then Hartshorne is as com …
15
votes
Fermat numbers and the infinitude of primes
It's interesting that the coprimality of Fermat numbers was already known in
Goldbach's time. The reason for attributing the proof to Polya is presumably
that such a proof is indicated as an exercise …
2
votes
Book recommendations on cellular automata?
I can't improve on the list in Joseph O'Rourke's answer, but I'd like to mention that
Winning Ways gets on the list because of its discussion of Conway's "Life" cellular
automaton. In particular Winni …
23
votes
Autobiographies of mathematicians
Here are a few:
Girolamo Cardano: The Book of My Life.
(trans. by Jean Stoner. New York: New York Review of Books, 2002)
Norbert Wiener's two volumes
Ex-Prodigy: My Childhood and Youth. (MIT Press 195 …
7
votes
Who first used the cross-ratio to describe shapes in hyperbolic geometry?
I've hesitated to attempt an answer to this question because
I do not know about shape parameters. However, in the hope that
what is really wanted is a history of the cross-ratio, here goes.
The cro …
8
votes
solvable word problem without algorithm
The technique for constructing groups with unsolvable word problems
applies more generally to construct groups that "simulate'' Turing
machines. So, if a Turing machine halts for a recursive set of in …
44
votes
Fundamental groups of noncompact surfaces
I'm reluctant to advertise, but since no one else has answered yet,
I'll mention the proof on pp. 142--144 of my book Classical Topology
and Combinatorial Group Theory.
18
votes
Math History books
I'm pleased to hear that some MOers like my book, but I have to say that
I think it has too much math for a class of non-science majors. At best,
you might mine it for some homework problems because o …
12
votes
Has there ever been a weaker Church-like thesis?
I think it unlikely that anyone ever proposed a weaker Church's thesis,
because, as Tim Chow points out, diagonalization was known (and known to be
constructive) before anyone ever contemplated a def …