All Questions
7 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
7
votes
0
answers
507
views
Explicit formula for the Levi-Civita connection on a non-compact Riemannian symmetric space
Let $G/K$ be a non-compact Riemannian symmetric space, endowed with the Riemannian metric coming from the Killing form on the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of the semi-simple Lie group $G$. Here $K$ is ...
7
votes
0
answers
138
views
Symmetric pairs of holomorphic type
Let $G$ be a real simple Lie group of Hermitian type; that is, $G/K$ carries a structure of a Hermitian symmetric space where $K$ is a maximal compact subgroup of $G$. Equivalently, the center $Z(\...
4
votes
0
answers
464
views
Isometry groups of symmetric spaces
Let $M=G/K$ be a symmetric space where $G=\mathrm{Isom}(M)$ and $K$ is the isotropy at some point $o\in M$. Moreover, let $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\mathfrak{p}$ be the Cartan decomposition of $\...
3
votes
0
answers
142
views
Conjugacy classes of Cartan subspaces in parahermitian symmetric spaces
Are there any good tables of the numbers of conjugacy classes of Cartan subspaces in pseudo-Riemannian symmetric spaces? Or a good method to count them? In particular, I am interested in the ...
2
votes
0
answers
158
views
Kernel of the Weil homomorphism for compact symmetric spaces
Let $X = G/K$ be a Riemannian symmetric space of compact type and consider the "Weil homomorphism" $$w^\bullet: H^\bullet(BK; \mathbb R) \to H^\bullet(X; \mathbb R),$$ i.e. the map in cohomology ...
2
votes
0
answers
339
views
volume form in a symmetric space of real rank one
I want to compare the two canonical volume forms on a noncompact symmetric space fo real rank one.
The first one is the volume form induced by the Riemannian structure given by the Killing form ...
1
vote
0
answers
235
views
Connectedness of symmetric subgroup of simply connected Lie group
Let $G$ be a connected real simple Lie group, and $\tau$ be an involutive automorphism of $G$. Then $\tau$ defines a symmetric subgroup $G^\tau$ of $G$. In general, $G^\tau$ is not necessarily ...