Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
33 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
19 votes
0 answers
703 views

The cofinality of $(\mathbb{N}^\kappa,\le)$ for uncountable $\kappa$?

For a partially ordered set $P$, a set $A\subseteq P$ is cofinal if for each element of $P$ there is a larger element in $A$. The cofinality of $P$, ${\rm cof}(P)$, is the minimal cardinality of a ...
Boaz Tsaban's user avatar
  • 3,104
17 votes
0 answers
509 views

The free complete lattice on three generators, beyond ZF

This was originally asked at MSE; although it is still under bounty it seems unlikely to be answered there. $\mathsf{ZF}$ proves that there is no free complete lattice on three generators since any ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
14 votes
0 answers
390 views

Can the axiom of choice be expressed in 4 quantifiers?

This 2007 paper presents a 5-quantifier $(\in, =)$-expression that is ZF-equivalent to the axiom of choice, but leaves open the 4-quantifier case: Thus the gap is reduced to the undecided case of a 4 ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
12 votes
0 answers
210 views

Are there times when replacement is "more natural" than collection?

There are a couple examples I'm aware of where choosing to axiomatize $\mathsf{ZF(C)}$ using collection instead of replacement results in a much nicer (or at least less surprising) picture: Let $\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
269 views

Freiling's question

(I've asked this question at Math StackExchange here but haven't gotten any response, so I decided to take a shot here as well.) In his paper "Axioms of Symmetry: Throwing Darts at the Real ...
Y.Z.'s user avatar
  • 231
12 votes
0 answers
574 views

Harvey Friedman's minimalist axioms for set theory

[This is a question on the FOM mailing list.] In 1997, Harvey Friedman introduced the following theory: Let $\in$ be a binary predicate and $U$ be a constant. Add the following axioms: Subworld ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
6 votes
0 answers
190 views

Is Vopěnka's principle inherited by Grothendieck topoi?

I call the Vopěnka's principle: Every subfunctor of an accessible functor is accessible but other formulations (which may lose equivalence in weak contexts?) are also interesting to me. If this is ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
278 views

Class theory of ZF-minus-Powerset as classical predicative system?

I've been thinking about some mathematics in weaker foundational systems a little bit, largely from a structural viewpoint, and with particular attention to classes. Some categories I've been keeping ...
David Roberts's user avatar
  • 35.5k
4 votes
0 answers
140 views

Is well-pointedness the reason that the internal/external distinction seems not to apply to $\mathbf{Set}$?

When reasoning about the category of sets, we usually don't have to worry about the internal/external distinction. For example, if $f : X \rightarrow Y$ is a morphism of sets, then $f$ is either ...
goblin GONE's user avatar
  • 3,793
4 votes
0 answers
424 views

What are the requirements of a foundational theory?

There are multiple languages to describe all of mathematics, and there are some equivalences between them, some more successful then others. My question is can we describe some requirements (in some ...
Omer Rosler's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
165 views

Suitability of formal type theory for mathematical thinking (vs. traditional set theory)

Type theory has advantages over set theory for the (computer) formalisation of mathematics, but has anybody who does mathematics with pen and paper found proof assistants or automated theorem provers, ...
Troubled Shallows's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
184 views

Can we interpret ZFC in GEM?

I have long held similar views as put forth here. As professor Hamkins points out though, $(M,\subseteq)$ is insufficient to model most of mathematics. However, this is unsatisfactory to me, as this ...
tox123's user avatar
  • 433
3 votes
0 answers
301 views

What does second order set theory give us that is new?

There is a natural analogy between the theories PA and ZFC. See the linked question by Gro-Tsen here. Peano arithmetic (PA) is a first order approximation to the natural numbers. As is well known, ...
Pace Nielsen's user avatar
  • 18.7k
2 votes
0 answers
220 views

Which is richer Set or Graph Theory?

This theory about structures, defined as abstractions over isomorphic graphs, can interpret Set Theory in a rather creepy manner. Though the theory is largely technical, yet it is not far from being ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
133 views

Higher-order oracle computation of reals and axiom of constructibility

Certain real numbers can be approximated arbitrarily well by computable functions. If we introduce halting oracles, then more real numbers can be "computed", like Chaitin's constant or the ...
GChromodynamics's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
159 views

Why not replace reflection by bounded reflection in Muller's approach?

Bounded Reflection: If $\phi$ is a formula in the language of set theory [i.e.; $\small \sf FOL(=,\in)$], in which all and only symbols $``x,x_1,..,x_n"$ occur free, and $\phi^V$ is the formula ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
305 views

Does this axiomatic system satisfy requirements for founding mathematics?

In this article, the author, F.A.Muller, suggests criteria for a founding theory of mathematics (pp:14-16). The author proposes $ARC$ Class Theory to embody these requirements. The motivation is ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
92 views

Constructing the Von Neuman Hierarchy at ω+ω in a structural set theory

I'm working in SEAR which is a relatively new structural set theory, and I am trying to prove the existence of big sets. SEAR has the collection axiom which is, loosely speaking, that for every ...
Kile Kasmir Asmussen's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
150 views

Is there equality between sets in structural set theory?

In material set theory, the axiom of extensionality defines equality between sets: two sets are equal iff they have the same elements. In structural set theory, one cannot formulate this. But however,...
user105099's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
264 views

About the limitation by size

This could be a big post, so I'll try to summarize my thoughts and divide them into several questions. When working in category theory, I used to choose the following definition. A category $C$ is ...
C. Dubussy's user avatar
  • 1,017
2 votes
0 answers
167 views

Multitype approaches to choice?

I wonder if anyone has developed a set theory which approaches the issue of the non-emptiness of products of non-empty sets via a hierarchy of types (comparable to how Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set ...
David Feldman's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
81 views

How strong is separation + reflection without transitivity?

Consider a theory $T$ with a binary relation $\in$ and the following axiom schemas: $\exists u \forall x (x \in u \leftrightarrow x \in a \land \phi)$ where $u$ is not free in $\phi$. This is the ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
1 vote
0 answers
57 views

What is the consistency strength of this addition on simple type-set theory?

Language: multi-sorted first order logic with equality and membership, where for each natural $n$ there is a set $x^n$ of sort $n$. Equality "$=$" only occurs between variables of the same ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
123 views

Is $\sf \Gamma_0$ the proof theoretic ordinal of this kind of predicative class theory?

Adopting the approach of Mono-sorted $\sf NBG$, define sets as elements of classes, then axiomatize: Extensionality, Predicative Class comprehension, emptyset, in the usual manner along mono-sorted $\...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
127 views

What is the proof theoretic ordinal of this kind of predicative type-set theory?

The following is a kind of Predicative Type Set Theory. The question is about what is exactly the proof theoretic ordinal of this theory? Is it lower than the one expected for predicative theories, i....
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
117 views

Can this type theory interpret second order arithmetic?

Language: multi-sorted first order logic with equality and membership, where for each natural $t$ there is a set $x^t$ of sort $t$. Equality "$=$" only occurs between variables of the same ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
94 views

Is definability in $V$ in $\sf Ack+MK$ expressible in its language?

Recall Ackermann set theory. If we extend Ackermann's set theory by adding all axioms of $\sf MK$ to it. We shall denote the universe of all elements by $W$, while $V$ is the primitive constant symbol ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
204 views

Can Frege set extensions of second order unary predicates serve as a foundation for mathematics?

To second order logic, add a primitive partial one place function symbol "$\epsilon$" from unary predicate symbols [upper cases] to object symbols [lower cases]. Define: $ x=y \equiv_{df} \...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
192 views

Does foundationless Ackermann set theory prove replacement?

From Ackermann's set theory equals ZF (1970) by William N. Reinhardt: Let A be the theory determined by the following axioms: Extensionality: $\forall z (z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \to x = y$ ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
1 vote
0 answers
278 views

A countable set theory providing choice?

Instead of Zermelo set theory $Z$ take $Y$ = $Z$ minus the power set axiom plus Enumerability: $\forall x(x\neq \emptyset \to\exists f[f:\mathbb{N}\overset{onto}{\frown}x ])$ $\imath$ is the ...
Frode Alfson Bjørdal's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
223 views

What should one know about abstract sets and structural foundations?

Recently I came by accident across the book sets for mathematics by Lawvere. It says: First we deplete the object of nearly all content. We could think of an idealized computer memory bank that ...
SetFoundations's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
257 views

Is there a non-trivial consistency preserving transformation?

In ‎set ‎theory ‎"equiconsistency" (and not "consistency") ‎of ‎the ‎theories ‎is the‎ ‎main ‎part ‎of ‎researches. ‎So ‎we ‎usually ‎try ‎to ‎construct a‎ ‎new model ‎using a‎ ‎given ‎one. ‎In ‎the ‎...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
78 views

'Maximising interpretative power entails maximising consistency strength'?

I'm hoping there is a clear mathematical answer to this question (hence asking it here) rather than anything more exegetical (in which case it's presumably not appropriate for this site). In his paper ...
aidangallagher4's user avatar