Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Hamiltonian systems, symplectic flows, classical integrable systems
6
votes
To what extent can I think of a Lagrangian fibration in a symplectic manifold as T*N?
Hey Theo --- I don't think it is reasonable to expect Lagrangian fibrations to be cotangent bundles globally. Easy example: take a 2d torus, give it a symplectic form (equivalently a volume form in t …
8
votes
Accepted
Clarification of classical field theory lecture notes by P. Deligne and D. Freed
Configuration space is, by definition, the position space of your particles. Phase space, on the other hand, is the space of pairs (position, momentum). The latter has a symplectic structure; the form …
7
votes
Cotangent bundle of a submanifold
Here is an attempt.
Let $X$ be a submanifold of $Y$, and let $i : X \to Y$ be the inclusion. In general, we have the exact sequence of vector bundles $$ 0 \to N^\ast X \to i^\ast T^\ast Y \to T^\ast …
4
votes
2
answers
751
views
Convergence of quantum cohomology
For which manifolds or varieties is quantum cohomology known to converge? Are there any manifolds for which quantum cohomology is known to not converge? I seem to have the impression that quantum coho …
0
votes
Accepted
Convergence of quantum cohomology
See Dmitri's comment.
10
votes
Has anything precise been written about the Fukaya category and Lagrangian skeletons?
There are a few comments about this in the notes from Kontsevich's talk (Internet Archive) at the Arbeitstagung (Internet Archive).
I also attended the Seidel talk that people are referring to. I shou …
7
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Different definitions of Novikov ring?
Following, e.g., Wikipedia's definitions, the (small) quantum cohomology ring of $X$ is defined over a "Novikov ring" consisting of formal power series of the form $$ \sum_{\beta \in H_2(X;\mathbb{Z}) …
16
votes
Examples in mirror symmetry that can be understood.
Here is the simplest example that I can think of...
The ordinary cohomology ring of $\mathbb{CP}^n$ is given by $\mathbb{C}[a]/(a^{n+1})$. The structure of this ring can be thought of as describing t …
10
votes
5
answers
1k
views
Compact Kaehler manifolds that are isomorphic as symplectic manifolds but not as complex man...
What are some examples of compact Kaehler manifolds (or smooth complex projective varieties) that are not isomorphic as complex manifolds (or as varieties), but are isomorphic as symplectic manifolds …
15
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Where does the Givental reconstruction formula come from?
In (for example) Semisimple Frobenius structures at higher genus (section 1.2) and Gromov-Witten invariants and quantization of quadratic Hamiltonians (section 6.8), Givental gives a conjectural formu …
9
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Are Fukaya categories Calabi-Yau categories?
Let X be a compact symplectic manifold. There is an idea, I think probably originally due to Kontsevich, that we should be able to get Gromov-Witten invariants of X out of the Fukaya category of X. On …
11
votes
1
answer
2k
views
"Fourier-Mukai" functors for Fukaya categories?
I just skimmed a bit of this fresh-off-the-press paper on homological mirror symmetry for general type varieties.
One thing that intrigued me was statement (ii) of Conjecture 3.3. It suggests that, j …
14
votes
4
answers
2k
views
Negative Gromov-Witten invariants
I understand the heuristic reason why Gromov-Witten invariants can be rational; roughly it's because we're doing curve counts in some stacky sense, so each curve $C$ contributes $1/|\text{Aut}(C)|$ to …
4
votes
Is there an algebraic construction of the Quillen (determinant) Line Bundle?
I hope I'm not getting any details wrong, but I think the Narasimhan-Seshadri theorem asserts that the moduli space of $G=U(n)$ representations of $\pi_1$ is the same as the moduli space $M(n)$ of sem …
16
votes
What is the role of contact geometry in the hamiltonian mechanics?
I think the basic example is when you have a symplectic manifold $M$ with a Hamiltonian $H : M \to \mathbb{R}$. Then take a regular value $a$ of $H$, and look at the hypersurface $N := H^{-1}(a)$, whi …