Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 7206

Descriptive Set Theory is the study of definable subsets of Polish spaces, where definable is taken to mean from the Borel or projective hierarchies. Other topics include infinite games and determinacy, definable equivalence relations and Borel reductions between them, Polish groups, and effective descriptive set theory.

8 votes
1 answer
693 views

$\Delta^0_{\alpha}$ universal sets does not exist

I am taking a course in descriptive set theory, and the exam is approaching on Sunday. In the framework of proving that for an uncountable Polish space $X$ the following holds: $\Delta^0_\alpha(X)\sub …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
5 votes
Accepted

Dependent choices (DC) in ${\bf HOD}(\mathbb{R},X)$, where $X$ is a set of reals

Consider the "singular Solovay-style model" of John Truss from Truss, John, Models of set theory containing many perfect sets, Ann. Math. Logic 7, 197-219 (1974). ZBL0302.02024. In that model the fo …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
4 votes

Is it inconsistent for a model of set theory to contain its own first order theory?

Not more than having large cardinals. If $V_\kappa$ is a model of $\sf ZF$, it contains all the reals and therefore its own theory. It just doesn't know it. It's not a first order definable real the …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
5 votes

How much choice is needed to prove this statement?

Note that these are all countable sets, so what you'd have here is a sequence of countable sets of reals indexed by $\omega_1$. This is certainly inconsistent with $\sf AD$, since from such a sequence …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
10 votes
3 answers
1k views

Universal sets in metric spaces

(I am cross-posting this from math.SE as it seems to be slightly over the top for that site.) I saw in the class the theorem: Suppose $X$ is a separable metric space, and $Y$ is a polish space (metr …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
15 votes
Accepted

Can $\mathbb{R}$ be partitioned into dedekind-finite sets?

YES WE CAN! Suppose that there is an infinite Dedekind-finite set of real numbers $A$ (e.g. Cohen's first model). Simple cardinal arithmetic shows that, $$|\Bbb R|\leq|\Bbb R\times A|\leq|\Bbb{R\time …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
5 votes
Accepted

$\mathtt{PSP}$ holding only for sets of cardinality $\mathfrak{c}$

Here are the answers you're looking for: No. No. Yes, no large cardinals needed! (Which explains the previous two answers.) Look no further than John Truss' paper: Truss, John, Models of set theory …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
4 votes
1 answer
421 views

Perfect set property implies $\omega_1$ is a limit cardinal in $L$

Specker proved in 1957 that if in $V$ every set of real numbers has the perfect set property, than in $L$, $\omega_1^V$ is actually a limit cardinal. The original proof is in German, and I've been lo …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
6 votes
0 answers
401 views

General theory of the reals in Solovay-like models

Solovay's model is a famous model of $\sf ZF$ where we start in $L$ with $\kappa$ inaccessible, and we collapse all the ordinals below $\kappa$ to be countable, without collapsing $\kappa$ itself, and …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
3 votes

"Potentially club" filters on $\omega_2$

Without choice, the Levy collapse, being $\omega_1^{<\omega}$ ordered by reverse inclusion, is well-orderable so every set of ordinals has a canonical name, and the usual choice-arguments continue to …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
11 votes

Cardinal arithmetic under determinacy

Starting from $L(\Bbb R)$, we can take a symmetric extension which preserves $\sf DC$ and adds an $\omega_1$-amorphous set, just somewhere far above $\Theta$. So we cannot prove that (1) or (2) hold f …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k
14 votes
Accepted

Pathological behavior of Borel sets?

Joel speaks on the case where the real numbers are a countable union of countable sets. The Feferman-Levy model is a strange model indeed. However, I find the Truss construction to be even weirder. T …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.8k