Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with banach-algebras
Search options not deleted
user 61771
4
votes
0
answers
84
views
Can a spectral projection fail to preserve a closed invariant subspace of its parent operator?
Let $X$ be a complex Banach space, and let $T:X\longrightarrow X$ be a bounded linear operator. Let $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ be disjoint compact subsets of $\mathbb{C}$ for which $\sigma_1\cup \sigma …
- 778
1
vote
Accepted
Function in $B(\mathbb{R})$
You may be aware of this already, but a similar (if not the same) question is addressed in Rudin's Fourier Analysis on Groups. Material on the same subject can be found in Katznelson's Harmonic analys …
- 778
1
vote
Rigorous justification for this formal solution to $f(x+1)+f(x)=g(x)$
Just to add another answer to the pile...
I suspect that the 'magic' observed here may be related to so-called local spectral theory. It is possible to do quite a lot (at least in the Banach space se …
- 778