Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 3272

History and philosophy of mathematics, biographies of mathematicians, mathematics education, recreational mathematics, communication of mathematics.

13 votes

Dirichlet and the prime number theorem

The second paper is Sur l'usage des séries infinies dans la théorie des nombres Crelle $\mathbf{18}$ (1838), 259--274. The quote in Crelle is near the end, at the top of p. 272. After it he says he …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
27 votes

Historical question in analytic number theory

To extend on Matt's comment about Euler, here is something I wrote up some years ago about Euler's discovery of the functional equation only at integral points. I hope there are no typos. Although Eul …
LSpice's user avatar
  • 12.9k
12 votes
Accepted

Discovery of Hilbert polynomial

In the 1st chapter of Eisenbud's book that you had mentioned, he discusses four fundamental theorems of Hilbert that appeared in 1890 and 1893 (see p. 26): the basis theorem, the Nullstellensatz, the …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
17 votes
Accepted

Question on a crucial lemma in Euler's approach to Fermat's Last Theorem for $n=3$

Euler's attack on the lemma was flawed precisely because of the (implicit) assumption regarding the veracity of a third powers product principle in $\mathbf Z[\sqrt{-3}]$. A close reading of Euler's …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
11 votes

Who first proved that algebraic numbers form an algebraically closed field?

In 1882, Dedekind and Weber developed the theory of Riemann surfaces purely algebraically, by taking as their primary object of study not Riemann surfaces, but instead function fields $K$ over $\mathb …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
80 votes

In "splendid isolation"

Cormack and Hounsfield received the 1979 Nobel prize in medicine for their work on CT scans. Cormack, a physicist, published his mathematical work on this in 1963, to essentially no response. Hounsfie …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
53 votes

Do you read the masters?

In algebraic number theory, the existence of a Frobenius element at any prime $p$ in a Galois extension $K/{\mathbf Q}$ is crucial. That is, for any prime ideal $\mathfrak p$ lying over $p$ in $K$ th …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
7 votes

Priming for the primes

Here is a characterization of entropy functions due to Faddeev in 1956 (see pp. 229-231 of Faddeev's paper here if you read Russian or Chapter 1 of A. Feinstein's 1958 book Foundations of information …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
27 votes

Swimming against the tide in the past century: remarkable achievements that arose in contras...

In the first decades of the 20th century, $p$-adic analysis (or valuation theory more generally) was regarded by many as rather exotic. After Hensel's work there was a steady development by Strassmann …
Greg Martin's user avatar
  • 12.8k
23 votes

Modern results that are widely known, yet which at the time were ignored, not accepted or cr...

Does acceptance of conjectures before they became theorems count? Example 1. The Artin reciprocity law. When Artin went around to other people describing what he was trying to show, nobody else belie …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
21 votes

Widely accepted mathematical results that were later shown to be wrong?

Any rational function field over a finite field has genus $0$ and class number $1$, where the class number of a function field over a finite field is the number of degree-zero elements of the divisor …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
227 votes

Widely accepted mathematical results that were later shown to be wrong?

Mathematicians used to hold plenty of false, but intuitively reasonable, ideas in analysis that were backed up with proofs of one kind or another (understood in the context of those times). Coming to …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
33 votes
Accepted

history of quaternion algebras

In the early 1900s, Dickson introduced what he called generalized quaternion algebras over any field $K$ of characteristic not 2. These are exactly what we'd call quaternion algebras over $K$. His def …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
17 votes

History of the Frobenius Endomorphism?

Since you reach back to Euler, who proved Fermat's little theorem in the form $a^p \equiv a \bmod p$ by using induction on $a$ and the binomial theorem, I think your "Frobenius endomorphism" is the $p …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k
19 votes

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

I think the Busemann-Petty problem is an example like what you're asking, although changes in opinion would be due to progress (positive and negative) rather than any heuristic analysis. A great de …
KConrad's user avatar
  • 50.6k

15 30 50 per page