Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 22131

Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.

73 votes
Accepted

Why did Voevodsky consider categories "posets in the next dimension", and groupoids the corr...

First, there is indeed nothing mathematically very deep in this observation, and I agree that the word "breakthrough" might be exaggerated. But on the other hand lots of very deep ideas look trivial o …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
47 votes
2 answers
5k views

The two ways Feynman diagrams appear in mathematics

I've heard about two ways mathematicians describe Feynman diagrams: They can be seen as "string diagrams" describing various type of arrows (and/or compositions operations on them) in a monoidal clo …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
38 votes
Accepted

Could groups be used instead of sets as a foundation of mathematics?

The answer is yes, in fact one has a lot better than bi-interpretability, as shown by the corollary at the end. It follows by mixing the comments by Martin Brandenburg and mine (and a few additional d …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
36 votes
Accepted

Current status of Grothendieck's homotopy hypothesis and Whitehead's algebraic homotopy prog...

The problem is that the question is highly dependent on the definition of $n$-groupoids. The notion of strict $n$-groupoid is very clear and precise but we know very well (and Grothendieck knew that) …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
33 votes
1 answer
777 views

Proof assistant for working in weaker foundations?

In some of my works I need to prove some results within the internal logic of categories with not much structures (like pretoposes or even just categories with finite limits). The kind of things I wan …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
29 votes

Why is the bicategory viewpoint useful?

You believe the 1-category is interesting but somehow not the bicategory, yet one could say the exact same thing one dimension below: Why is this category even interesing while you could just consider …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
27 votes

How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?

I just realized that my comment actually answer completely the case of a Cartesian closed category with finite coproducts, and not just extensive categories. So I'm posting it as an answer. The short …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
26 votes
Accepted

The formal p-adic numbers

Yes there is: the formal locale of p-adic integer is simply defined as the projective limit of the $\mathbb{Z}/p^k\mathbb{Z}$ (as a pro-finite locale). So internally in any topos a continuous function …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
26 votes
Accepted

Why do we care about small sets?

First, it is important to distinguish between the problem related to the foundation you are using from the problems that are inherent to category theory. For example, the distinction between $\mathbb{ …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
25 votes
0 answers
1k views

$\infty$-topos and localic $\infty$-groupoids?

It's known that every classical (Grothendieck) topos is equivalent to the topos of sheaves on a localic groupoid (a groupoid in the category of locales). For the record, this is proved by, starting fo …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
25 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is the opposite category of commutative von Neumann algebras a topos?

By the "category of commutative von Neumann algebras" I mean the category of all commutative von Neumann algebras with normal unital $*$-homomorphisms between them (I don't want to restrict to separab …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
24 votes
3 answers
2k views

Dualizable object in the category of locally presentable categories

The bicategory of locally presentable categoires, and left adjoint functor between them, is monoidal closed for the Kelly tensor product. My question is what are the dualizable objects for this monoid …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
23 votes
Accepted

Locales as geometric objects

First, if you haven't already you should have a look at this introductory paper by P.T. Johnstone The Art of pointless thinking which gives a lot of insight on how locale theory works. Here are some o …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
22 votes
Accepted

Why is the theory of small categories not algebraic?

This follows from two Facts: 1) A category monadic over Set/S is always an exact category. That is it has quotient by equivalence relation that are effective and universal. It is in particular a regu …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
22 votes
Accepted

Why are operads sometimes better than algebraic theories?

First - yes, for symmetric set-operads this functor is "injective", though it is not fully faithful. It is faithful on general maps and fully faithful on isomorphisms. Its image can easily be characte …
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k

1
2 3 4 5
17
15 30 50 per page