Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1946

For questions about the surreal numbers, which are a real-closed ordered proper-class-sized field that contains both the real numbers and the ordinal numbers. Thus they contain both infinite numbers (including the ordinals, but also infinite numbers like ω-1 and sqrt(ω)) and infinitesimal numbers (like 1/ω). They can also be identified with a subclass of two-player partisan games.

74 votes
Accepted

What's wrong with the surreals?

At a recent conference in Paris on Philosophy and Model Theory (at which I also spoke), Philip Ehrlich gave a fascinating talk on the surreal numbers and new developments, showcasing it as unifying ma …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
43 votes
4 answers
3k views

What do we know about the computable surreal numbers?

The surreal numbers are built up in a natural iterative process, by which at any ordinal stage, if one has two sets of surreal numbers $L$ and $R$, with every number $x_L$ in $L$ strictly below every …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
42 votes
Accepted

Who wins two player sudoku?

Update. I made a blog post about Infinite Sudoku and the Sudoku game, following up on ideas in this post and the comments below. I claim that the second player wins the even-sized empty Sudoku boa …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
32 votes
Accepted

Are the real numbers isomorphic to a nontrivial ultraproduct of fields?

The answer is no, because such ultrapowers are always $\aleph_1$-saturated, but $\mathbb{R}$ is not. More concretely, the ultraproduct will be an ordered field with uncountable cofinality — every cou …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
21 votes
1 answer
855 views

Is there a minimal (least?) countably saturated real-closed field?

I heard from a reputable mathematician that ZFC proves that there is a minimal countably saturated real-closed field. I have several questions about this. Is there a soft model-theoretic construction …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
19 votes
Accepted

Going beyond the surreal numbers

Relentlessly filling cuts is of course the main construction idea of the surreal numbers---at every ordinal birthday, one fills all the cuts that exist in the previously-born surreals. Your proposal i …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
18 votes
0 answers
885 views

Is the universality of the surreal number line a weak global choice principle?

I'd like to consider the principle asserting that the surreal number line is universal for all class linear orders, or in other words, that every linear order (including proper-class-sized) linear ord …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
18 votes
Accepted

In surreal numbers, what exactly is $\omega_1$?

There is nothing special about $\omega_1$ or indeed any infinite number in the surreals, and they cannot be defined purely from the field structure of the surreals. What I claim is that all infinite n …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
17 votes

What do we know about the computable surreal numbers?

Here is some partial progress. I claim that the computable surreal numbers include some noncomputable real numbers, confirming my guess in connection with question 2. For each TM program $e$ we can wr …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
17 votes
2 answers
2k views

Do the surreal numbers enjoy the transfer principle in ZFC?

The surreal field $\newcommand\No{№}\No$ is definable in ZFC, and it is easy to see that the surreal order is $\kappa$-saturated for every cardinal $\kappa$, precisely because we fill any specified ga …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Can you build the surreal numbers as a simple direct limit of ordered fields?

Here is one way to get a positive answer to the title question. Theorem. There is a definable class $\mathcal{F}$ of ordered fields, containing isomorphic copies of any given field, and a directed ord …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

Surreal Numbers, Proving $x1=x$

If you look at the Wikipedia entry for surreal multiplication, you find The recursive formula for multiplication contains arithmetic expressions involving the operands and their left and right set …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

Largest ordered "field" in NBG without axiom of global choice

There is no problem defining the surreal field without global choice. One can define it in ZFC and considerably weaker theories, for example with the hereditary birthday construction of left-sets and …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
376 views

Can one define in ZFC a directed system of embeddings on the class of all linear orders real...

Consider the surreal line $\langle\newcommand\No{\text{No}}\No,\leq\rangle$, in its order structure only. This is a proper class linear order, which is universal for all set-sized linear orders, as we …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Surreal numbers, ultrapowers of $\Bbb R$, ordinal-valued functions and the slow-growing hier...

This kind of analysis is very well understood in ultrapowers, and one often sees this kind of thinking with ultrapowers, where one performs calculations with the representing function for an object. W …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

15 30 50 per page