The surreal-analysis tag has no usage guidance.

**10**

votes

**1**answer

225 views

### Theory of C* algebras over other fields than the complex numbers

How much of the theory of C*-algebras holds when the complex numbers are replaced by different (algebraically closed) field (possibly with a distinguished ordered subfield that satisfies the same ...

**3**

votes

**0**answers

296 views

### More information on Kruskal's treatment of Surreal numbers as an asymptotic behavior of a real valued function

The only way that I could think about Surreal numbers is how Conway defined them inductively, with the two axioms and so on. I can't find any information about Kruskal's point of view and would very ...

**14**

votes

**2**answers

781 views

### Is it possible to generalize functions like $x^y, \ln x, \sin x, \arctan x$ to surreal numbers or surcomplex numbers?

Is it possible to generalize functions like $x^y, \ln x, \sin x, \arctan x$ to surreal numbers or surcomplex numbers? Which of their properties and relations (e.g. usual trig identities) will still ...

**12**

votes

**1**answer

1k views

### Surreal numbers vs. non-standard analysis

What is the relationship between the surreal numbers and non-standard analysis?
In particular, is there a transfer principle for surreal numbers they way there is for NSA?
A specific situation in ...

**9**

votes

**0**answers

604 views

### Characterizing the surcomplex numbers

Conway showed that the Field of surreal numbers ("${\bf No}$")
is the maximal totally ordered Field.
Later Jacob Lurie showed that the Group of all partizan games ${\bf Pg}$ is
the universally ...