Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 16751

Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.

29 votes
Accepted

Higher dimensional version of the Hurwitz formula?

degree of the canonical divisor doesn't make any sense as already pointed out by Mohammed. On the other hand, by "purity of the branch locus", the branch locus, as well as the ramification locus of …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
13 votes

Hodge numbers of reduction mod $p$

As already pointed out, the Hodge numbers may go up under reduction modulo $p$. On the other hand, let me also point out that the situation can be controlled: 1.) For all $p$, where $\overline{X}_p$ …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
12 votes

Use of Hilbert Schemes in Arithmetic?

Quite generally, whenever you ``need a moduli space'', say, polarized deformations of varieties, or spaces of morphisms, you oftentimes construct it as follows: first, you construct some family in pro …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
12 votes

When does $\operatorname{Aut}(X)=\operatorname{Bir}(X)$ hold?

It also holds for minimal surfaces of Kodaira dimension $\kappa\geq0$.
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
10 votes

Generalisations of Riemann-Roch for surfaces

The adjunction formula in the form $$ \omega_C \cong \omega_X(C)|_C $$ holds whenever $C$ is a Cartier divisor on a Gorenstein scheme $X$. Taking Euler characteristics, you get an extremely general g …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
10 votes

Divisorial contraction: when is the image an algebraic space or a stack?

In order to have a contraction morphism $X\to Y$, the intersection matrix must be negative definite. Conversely, if the intersection matrix is negative definite, the contraction morphism exists in th …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
9 votes

How do non-trivial global differentials give non-trivial cohomology classes in positive char...

Although Felipe answered your question, let me come back to David's wish, and give an answer using and advocating crystalline cohomology: First, if $X$ is, say, smooth and proper over a field $k$, t …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Hodge spectral sequence for algebraic stacks

Did you have a look at Satriano's article de Rham Theory for Tame Stacks and Schemes with Linearly Reductive Singularities?
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
5 votes

Characterizations of Abelian varieties (3-folds) in positive characteristic

I don't have an answer, but a couple of comments that may be useful: The group $H^1({\cal O}_X)$ can be identified with the Zariski tangent space of ${\rm Pic}^0(X)$. Since the latter can be non-redu …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
5 votes

Simplest example of jumping of cohomology of structure sheaf in smooth families?

By the way, for Enriques this more than just an example - it reflects their classification: the moduli space of Enriques surfaces is connected in any characteristic. All such surfaces arise as desingu …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
5 votes

every involution of an Enriques surface is

Yes! However, as Rita, Torsten and Ru pointed out, my first ideas were too simple-minded. Although this makes the remarks by them somewhat unreadable, let me give the corrected answer: So, let $X$ be …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
4 votes

Quotients of rational surfaces

Just to round out the picture: if the characteristic of $k$ is positive and $G$ is a finite, but non-reduced group scheme (for example, the infinitesimal group scheme $\mu_p$ of $p$.the roots of unity …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar
2 votes

Why $\pi_1(X)\cong \pi_1(Y)$ for a double cover $\pi:X\to Y$ with a nef, smooth and big bran...

In case $B$ is ample this is Corollary 2.7 of Nori's paper: "Zariski's conjecture and related problems". I am not sure whether this result is originally due to Nori, but in this paper you will surely …
Christian Liedtke's user avatar