Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 15570

Banach spaces, function spaces, real functions, integral transforms, theory of distributions, measure theory.

0 votes
1 answer
267 views

Is there a "smooth Kantorovich-Rubinstein duality" for Wasserstein distances on smooth/Eucli...

Let $X$ be a compact metric space, and fix an arbitrary point $x_\ast \in X$. By the Kantorovich-Rubinstein duality theorem, the $1$-Wasserstein metric $W_1$ on the set of Borel probability measures o …
0 votes
0 answers
113 views

Is there a proper term for a "continuum-convex" set?

Let $X$ be a Banach space, and for any compactly supported Borel probability measure $\mathbb{P}$ on $X$, define the mean $\mu_\mathbb{P}$ by $\mu_\mathbb{P}=\int_X x \, \mathbb{P}(dx)$. I want to say …
10 votes
2 answers
551 views

Can Birkhoff's ergodic theorem for integrable functions easily be deduced from Birkhoff's er...

It seems to me that a considerably simpler proof [see below] of Birkhoff's ergodic theorem can be obtained for bounded observables than for more general $L^1$ observables. Therefore, I feel like it wo …
1 vote
0 answers
76 views

Is there a term for a linear operator on an $L^p$ space that "locally respects boundedness"?

Let $X$ be a Polish space, and $\mu$ a locally finite measure. Take any $p \in \{0\} \cup [1,\infty)$. We will say that a linear operator $T \colon L^p(\mu) \to L^p(\mu)$ has property $(\ast)$ if ever …
4 votes
0 answers
124 views

Is there a name for this slightly stronger version of Cesàro convergence which "more quickly...

Let $V$ be a normed vector space, let $l \in V$, and let $(a_n)$ be a sequence in $V$. We say that $a_n$ is Cesàro-convergent to $l$ if $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n a_i \to l$ as $n\to\infty$. Now I will …
3 votes
2 answers
337 views

How far can the domain of definition of multiplier operators be extended?

Given any $g \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$, we define the associated multiplier operator $T_g \colon L^2(\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(\mathbb{R})$ by $$ \mathcal{F}(T_g f) \ = \ g.\mathcal{F}f $$ where $\mathcal{F …
0 votes

How far can the domain of definition of multiplier operators be extended?

I think I can now prove the following (which covers the case requested in the bounty): Theorem. Let $g=P/Q$ for polynomials $P$ and $Q$ where $\mathrm{order}(P) \leq \mathrm{order}(Q)$ and $Q$ has no …
Julian Newman's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Convergence of Radon Nikodym derivatives

I'm going to assume that your space is locally compact (as well as $\sigma$-compact), so that $X$ is the union of a sequence of compact sets where each lies in the interior of the next. In this case, …
Julian Newman's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
446 views

"Strongly mutually singular" families of measures, and the set of ergodic measures

Let $(X,\Sigma)$ be a measurable space [which we can assume to be a standard Borel space if we wish]. Let $\mathcal{S}$ be a set of probability measures on $(X,\Sigma)$. [If we wish, we can assume th …
4 votes
1 answer
2k views

Are all linear transformations measurable?

Let $V$ and $W$ be topological vector spaces over $\mathbb{F}$ (with $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$), and let $T:V \to W$ be a linear transformation. It is well-known that $T$ is not necessar …