All Questions
18 questions
45
votes
8
answers
14k
views
How should one think about sheafification and the difference between a sheaf and a presheaf
The first time I got in touch with the abstract notion of a sheaf on a topological space $X$, I thought of it as something which assigns to an open set $U$ of $X$ something like the ring of continuous ...
16
votes
1
answer
448
views
Zorn's lemma for Grothendieck sites
In every treatment of Grothendieck sites I can find, flasque sheaves are not defined in the way one would naïvely expect from ordinary sheaf cohomology; namely instead of saying that "restriction ...
14
votes
2
answers
904
views
What's the easiest example of a morphism of topoi that is not from that of a site?
A topos is defined to be a category that's equivalent to the category of sheaves on a site. Morphisms between topoi is defined by a pair of adjoint functors that behave like pull-back/push-forward of ...
10
votes
1
answer
495
views
Properties of the petit Zariski topos
What are some (intrinsically formulated) properties of the locally ringed topos $(\mathbf{Sh}(X),\mathcal{O}_X)$ for some scheme $X$, which do not hold for arbitrary locally ringed toposes?
Is there, ...
9
votes
1
answer
804
views
Is the analytification functor part of a geometric morphism of topoi?
Let $Sh(\mathsf{\mathbb{C}-fAlg}^{op})$ be the topos of zariski sheaves on finitely genertaed $\mathbb{C}$-algebras.
A complex analytic space for our purpose is a locally ringed space locally ...
9
votes
0
answers
378
views
Is there any notion of "smoothification" from $\mathbb{R}$-schemes to generalized smooth spaces?
I will write $\operatorname{Diff}$ to denote a category of generalized smooth spaces e.g. $Sh(\mathsf{CartSp})$. Is there a version of $\operatorname{Diff}$ for which there exists a functor $\mathcal{...
8
votes
1
answer
319
views
How are the left and the right group of a bitorsor related?
This question arose from my answer to To what extent does a torsor determine a group: it turns out that I do not know one thing about it.
Let $G$, $G'$ be groups in some nice enough category (you may ...
8
votes
1
answer
562
views
Category of copresheaves over commutative monoids
Let C be a symmetric monoidal category. Let Comm(C) be the category of commutative monoids in C. Consider the topos X = CoPSh(Comm(C)) of covariant functors from Comm(C) to the category Set of sets.
...
7
votes
1
answer
291
views
Direct and inverse image terminology
Let $f\colon X\to Y$ be a continuous map. Then $f$ induces a geometric morphism $f^\ast\dashv f_\ast\colon \mathrm{Sh}(X)\leftrightarrows\mathrm{Sh}(Y)$, whose left adjoint is called inverse image and ...
7
votes
1
answer
255
views
Subobject classifier for sheaves on large sites with WISC
Let $\mathsf{C}$ be a possibly large category with a Grothendieck topology satisfying the Weakly Initial Set of Covers condition: there is for each $X$ a set (not a proper class) of covering families ...
6
votes
1
answer
239
views
What does an ideal correspond to in the internal language of sheaves?
Suppose I have a sheaf $\mathcal F$ in some topos $\mathrm{Sh}(\mathcal C)$. Then this becomes the sheaf of rings from algebraic geometry when described as a ring in the internal language of the topos....
3
votes
0
answers
215
views
How to read the definition of Grothendieck Pretopology in SGA4?
In SGA4, the first axiom of a Grothendieck pretopology is given as:
PT0: Pour tout objet $X$ de $C$, les morphismes des familles de morphismes de $Cov(𝑋)$
sont quarrables. (Rappelons qu’un morphisme ...
3
votes
0
answers
530
views
Flasque sheaves on a site
This is a cross-post from MathStackexchange.
We define a flasque sheaf on a site as one whose first Čech cohomology vanishes for every covering of every object of the site. I know this definition is ...
3
votes
0
answers
285
views
What is the logical progression in algebraic tools for studying spaces (varieties -> schemes, sheaves, topos etc.)?
Some algebraists (Cartier, Weil, Atiyah, etc.) sometimes speak of geometry as a long history of essentially asking the same question—"what is space, and how would one describe a space uniquely". ...
3
votes
0
answers
307
views
Locality in Grothendieck Topologies
Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category and $\mathcal{J}$ be a Grothendieck topology on it (i.e., $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{J})$ is a site). Then what is a good notion of locality in it?
I came up with the ...
2
votes
0
answers
361
views
epimorphism of fppf sheaves is an fppf morphism
I asked this question on math.stackexchange (https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2693471/epimorphism-of-fppf-sheaves-is-an-fppf-morphism) but didn't get an answer. Maybe someone here can help.
...
2
votes
0
answers
266
views
Relationship between coherent toposes/coherent logic and coherent sheaves
I've heard it claimed that the adjective "coherent" in logic/topos theory (i.e. coherent logic, coherent toposes, coherent categories) was adopted to fit in with the terminology of coherent sheaves in ...
1
vote
0
answers
82
views
Do the covariant maps of a sheaf with transfer automatically satisfy a dual gluing axiom?
I'm interested in describing a notion of equivariant sheaves that uses Mackey functors on topoi. We can describe a genuine G-spectrum as a spectral Mackey functor on the topos of finite G-sets. If we ...