Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
35 views

Operator-form correspondence without lower semiboundedness

When dealing with a normal unbounded operator $A$, it is often useful to frame questions about the operator in terms of questions about the associated form $\omega,$ which has domain $D(|A|^{1/2})$ ...
user_35's user avatar
  • 109
3 votes
1 answer
332 views

Takesaki II Lemma 1.13: stuck in proof

Consider the following fragment from Takesaki's book "Theory of operator algebras II" (Lemma 1.13 on p8, in chapter VI "Left Hilbert algebras"): Here, we associate with an ...
Andromeda's user avatar
  • 175
-1 votes
1 answer
164 views

Closure of the point spectrum of an unbounded diagonalizable operator

Given a (separable) Hilbert space H and an unbounded densely defined linear operator $T:{\cal D}(T) \to $H such that ${\cal D}$ is diagonalizable (it means $\exists$ an O.N.B. of H such that all basis ...
Dave Shulman's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
138 views

Antilinear unbounded operator has closed graph

Let $H$ and $K$ be Hilbert spaces and $D(T)$ a vector subspace of $H$. Let $T: D(T) \to K$ be a densely defined antilinear operator. Its adjoint $T^*: D(T^*)\to K$ is defined by the relation $$\langle ...
Andromeda's user avatar
  • 175
2 votes
1 answer
335 views

When the adjoint of an unbounded operator on a Hilbert space coincides with the formal adjoint on its natural domain?

This is almost a copy of https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3931318/when-the-adjoint-of-an-unbounded-operator-on-a-hilbert-space-coincides-with-the I am trying to work with infinite matrices in ...
apyshkin's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
916 views

Characterising closed range self-adjoint operators

Let $T:\mathrm{dom}(T) \subseteq H \to H$ be a densely defined, self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert spaces $𝐻$. In general the range of $T$ is not guaranteed to be closed. What tools are available to ...
Dave Shulman's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
113 views

An adjoint characterization of (unbounded) Fredholm operators

Let $\mathcal{H}_i$, for $i=1,2$, be Hilbert spaces, and $T:{\frak Dom}(T) \subseteq \mathcal{H}_1 \to \mathcal{H}_2$ a densely-defined closed operator. If the kernel of $T$, and the kernel of its ...
Max Schattman's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
277 views

Adjoint for a non-densely defined unbounded operator on a Hilbert space

Let $\mathbf{H}$ be a Hilbert space, and $D$ an unbounded densely-defined operator on $\mathbf{H}$. As is well-known, every such operator admits an adjoint, with domain possibly different from that ...
Max Schattman's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
465 views

Spectrum equals eigenvalues for unbounded operator

Let $D$ be an unbounded densely defined operator on a separable Hilbert space $H$. If $D$ is diagonalisable with all eigenvalues having finite multiplicity and growing towards infinity, does it follow ...
Bas Winkelman's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
214 views

Non-point spectrum for diagonalisable self-adjoint unbounded operator

Given a (separable) Hilbert space H and an unbounded densely defined linear operator $T:{\cal D}(T) \to $H such that ${\cal D}$ is diagonalizable (it means $\exists$ an O.N.B. of H such that all basis ...
Dave Shulman's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
1k views

Unbounded version of continuous functional calculus

For a normal operator $T$ on a Hilbert space ${\cal H}$, it is well known that for any continuous complex valued function $f$ on the spectrum of $T$, we have a well-defined operator $f(T) \in B({\cal ...
Dave Shulman's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
228 views

Symmetric diagonalizable operators and self-adjointness

Given a densely defined symmetric operator $L$ on a Hilbert space $H$, which is also assumed to be diagonalizable, will there always exist a unique extension of $L$ to a self-adjoint operator?
Milan Bernolak's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
926 views

Eigenvalues and Compact Resolvent

For $A$ an unbounded (densely defined) operator on a separable Hilbert space, what conditions on its eigenvalues will show that, for $\lambda \notin $spec$(A)$, we have that $(A-\lambda)^{-1}$ is a ...
Juan Corrida's user avatar