Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
9 votes
1 answer
546 views

Showing subgroups with equal Lie algebras are equal

Let $k$ be a field. It might as well be algebraically closed, but I do not want to assume that it has characteristic $0$. I will write "group" for "affine group scheme over $k$", ...
LSpice's user avatar
  • 12.9k
6 votes
0 answers
343 views

Are all stabilizer groups of the co-adjoint action smooth?

Let $k$ be a (non-archimedean) local field of positive characteristic $p$ and $\mathfrak{n}$ be any finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra over $k$ with nilpotence length $l<p$. It is well-known ...
m07kl's user avatar
  • 1,702
4 votes
0 answers
77 views

Conjugacy of cocharacters from conjugacy of labelled diagrams

Everything to follow is over some fixed algebraically closed field $k$. Although all the definitions make sense regardless of characteristic, the meat of the question is about small positive ...
LSpice's user avatar
  • 12.9k
4 votes
0 answers
204 views

Explicit description of wonderful compactification for PGL_3

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field of positive characteristics. Let $X$ be the wonderful compactification of $PGL_3$ (see for example section 6 of "Frobenius Splitting Methods in Geometry ...
Asav's user avatar
  • 163
3 votes
1 answer
245 views

Can non-geometrically reduced reduced subschemes happen for reductive groups?

The title is meant to be punchy, but also a tongue-in-cheek acknowledgement of the prevalence of ‘reduce’-derived words in this area. (Unfortunately, I overlooked the fact that the question in the ...
LSpice's user avatar
  • 12.9k
2 votes
1 answer
176 views

Isomorphisms $S^d(S^m(V)^*) \cong \Lambda^d(S^{m+d-1}(V)^*)$

$\DeclareMathOperator\SL{SL}$Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $V$ be a 2-dimensional vector space over $K$. The group $G=\SL_2(K)$ acts naturally on $V$ by left-multiplication on column ...
Jon Elmer's user avatar
  • 185
2 votes
1 answer
185 views

Finite, normal subgroups of reductive groups in positive characteristic

Consider the following statement about a connected, reductive group $G$ over a field $k$: Every finite, normal subgroup $N$ of $G$ is central. In characteristic $0$, this is true, and the proof is ...
LSpice's user avatar
  • 12.9k
1 vote
0 answers
187 views

Unitary dual of the Heisenberg group over non-archimedean local fields of characteristic two

What is the unitary dual of the Heisenberg group over non-archimedean local fields k of characteristic two? This is well-known for the real Heisenberg group and in fact, when local fields have ...
m07kl's user avatar
  • 1,702