Skip to main content

All Questions

9 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
10 votes
0 answers
226 views

Third homology of simply connected Chevalley–Demazure group schemes

I’ve been studying the group of $\mathbb{Z}$-points of the simply connected Chevalley–Demazure group scheme of type $E_7$, denoted $G_{\text{sc}}(E_7,\mathbb{Z})$; see Vavilov and Plotkin - Chevalley ...
Noah B's user avatar
  • 545
7 votes
0 answers
472 views

subgroups of higher rank lattices

This is related to the question $G=\langle a\rangle H$ for subgroup $H$ raised a few days ago. Suppose $\Gamma $ is a higher rank lattice (for example, $SL_3({\mathbb Z})$). As Misha says in his ...
Venkataramana's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
150 views

Lattices of minimal covolume in $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R}) \times \operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})$

What are the (uniform/non-uniform) irreducible lattices of minimal (or even small) covolume in $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R}) \times \operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})$? Context: Such a lattice will ...
Stefan Witzel's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
75 views

Equivalence of Lie theoretic definitions of an arithmetic lattice

In Margulis' book, there are actually two definitions of arithmetic lattices: If $\mathbf{G}$ is a connected semisimple algebraic $\mathbb{R}$-group, then a lattice $\Gamma \subset \mathbf{G}(\mathbb{...
WernerWald's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
151 views

On the existence of non-arithmetic lattices in algebraic groups over $\mathbb{Q}$

$\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}}\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}\DeclareMathOperator\PU{PU}$Let $G$ be a simple algebraic group over $\Q$ such that $G(\R) \simeq \prod_i G_i$, with each $G_i$ being the Lie ...
naf's user avatar
  • 10.5k
1 vote
0 answers
154 views

Definition of arithmetic subgroups of Lie groups

In Maclachlan-Reid we can read Let $G$ be a connected semisimple Lie group with trivial centre and no compact factor. Let $\Gamma\subset G$ be a discrete subgroup of finite covolume. Then $\Gamma$ is ...
Jacques's user avatar
  • 563
1 vote
0 answers
95 views

Small pants in arithmetic hyperbolic surfaces of high degree

Does the following statement hold: Statement: For any $\epsilon > 0$, there exist a number field $k$ of degree $d_{\epsilon}$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ and an arithmetic hyperbolic surface  $\Gamma$ ...
shurtados's user avatar
  • 1,101
0 votes
0 answers
121 views

Commensurability of arithmetic, irreducible, nonuniform lattices

Let $n \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 2}$ be arbitrary. Let $r_1$ and $r_2$ be arbitrary elements of $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$ that satisfy $r_1 + r_2 > 0.$ Let $G := {\rm SL}_n(\mathbb{R})^{r_1} \times {\rm SL}...
Mishel Skenderi's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
267 views

Definition of reducible lattice

I am reading Raghunathan's book on discrete subgroups of Lie groups. In particular I am stuck on Corollary 5.19 which gives several equivalent conditions for a lattice in a semisimple Lie group to be ...
user551642's user avatar