Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Hamiltonian systems, symplectic flows, classical integrable systems
15
votes
Accepted
Understanding moment maps and Lie brackets
This question is (at least as I read it) about the Poisson bracket; the Poisson bracket is a Lie bracket structure on the functions on a symplectic manifold.
So how should one think about Poisson b …
14
votes
Is there a physical intuition for Darboux's theorem?
Obviously, this is a question that could be interpreted in different ways. For me, Darboux's theorem is the symplectic analogue of the theorem that a flat Riemannian manifold (i.e. one where Riemann' …
12
votes
When is a symplectic manifold equivalent to a cotangent bundle?
Since the earlier (very nice) answers didn't actually say it, let me mention: lots of exact symplectic manifolds are not cotangent bundles. The hypersurface $xy=f(z)$ for $f$ a monic polynomial with …
12
votes
What is a Lagrangian submanifold intuitively?
A more general form of Francesco's answer is that coisotropic submanifolds are those locally defined as the zero set of some Poisson commuting functions, and Lagrangians are those where the number of …
9
votes
Accepted
Do there exist closed symplectic manifolds with Euler characteristic zero?
Yes. $T^2 \times T^2$ with the sum of the volume forms on each factor.
9
votes
Accepted
Understanding "Decategorified" symplectic Khovanov homology
One thing you didn't mention is the manifold in which this calculation happens: the Slodowy slice to a nilpotent of type $(n,n)$. This manifold is the key to everything, since it is a geometric avatar …
7
votes
Why can we define the moment map in this way (i.e. why is this form exact)?
One thing that seems to be confusing you is that there is no "the moment map." There often several different moment maps for the same action, and as Jose says, sometimes none.
On the other hand, you …
7
votes
Accepted
What is the "symplectic duality" between holomorphic symplectic manifolds? Where can I read ...
Nowhere. The paper is still in preparation, and looks to be for a few more months at least. Probably the best document at the moment is this (extremely long) set of talk slides of mine.
I should no …
6
votes
How can I tell whether a Poisson structure is symplectic "algebraically"?
The moral answer is "Yes. A Poisson structure is symplectic if and only if the algebra has no interesting Poisson ideals."
The idea is this: a Poisson ideal is one which is closed under the operatio …
5
votes
When a Morse function is also a Moment map...
In this case, if you pick a $S^1$-invariant metric, the Morse flow will commute with the $S^1$ action, and so you can think of them together as an action of $\mathbb{C}^*$ where the unit circle acts b …
4
votes
Irreducibility of holomorphic symplectic quotients
Work of Gan and Ginzburg (https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409262v7.pdf) shows that one of our favorite examples, $M=T^*(\mathfrak{gl}_n\oplus \mathbb C^n)$ and $G=GL(n)$, has a 0 level of the moment map w …
4
votes
Accepted
Compact Kaehler manifolds that are isomorphic as symplectic manifolds but not as complex man...
Well, there are stupid examples like the fact that $\mathbb{P}^n$ has Kähler structures where any rational multiple of the hyperplane class is the Kähler class which are compatible with the standard …
2
votes
Reduction along an Orbit for C.-M. systems
I believe you should interpret $dX\wedge dY$ as follows: $X$ is a matrix valued function on the space of pairs of matrices (which just takes the first one); its entries are honest functions $x_{i,j}$. …
2
votes
Accepted
Hamiltonian Reduction and Affine quotient
We can assume that $G$ is affine, since an abelian variety must act trivially on any affine variety. The closed points of $X$ are exactly the closed $G$-orbits on $\mu^{-1}(0)$. On an affine variety, …
2
votes
Does the preimage of the Slodowy slice in $T^*G/P$ have a name?
In my paper "Singular blocks of parabolic category O and finite W-algebras", these are called "S3-varieties." S3 is for "Slodowy-Springer-Spaltenstein."