Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 47391

Riemannian Geometry is a subfield of Differential Geometry, which specifically studies "Riemannian Manifolds", manifolds with "Riemannian Metrics", which means that they are equipped with continuous inner products.

8 votes
0 answers
824 views

(First) Bianchi Identities

I'm looking at a paper of J. A. Thorpe ("Some Remarks on the Gauss-Bonnet Integral"). In the paper he defines "higher-order" notions of curvature. One thinks of the usual curvature tensor as $R\in \La …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
432 views

The Yamabe problem and $\phi^4$ scalar field theory?

The other day I happened to be browsing this page on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_gap In the middle of the page is the equation $$\square\phi+\lambda\phi^3=0$$ where $\square$ is the …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
143 views

A Certain First-Order Differential Equation for a Closed 2-Form

Suppose we have a Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ and a fixed vector field $X$. Consider the following equations for a 2-form $F$: $$dF=0$$ $$(\delta-\iota_X) F=0$$ Here, $\delta$ is the codifferential i …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
513 views

Hamilton's Proof of the Tensor Maximum Principle

My questions come from Richard Hamilton's Three-Manifolds with Positive Ricci Curvature paper. I'm trying to work through parts of the paper so I can better understand the Ricci Flow for my research. …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
488 views

"Elliptic" proof that Compact Ricci Solitons are Gradient Ricci Solitons

I'm concerned with the following Proposition: If a compact manifold $M$ satisfies $$Rc + \textstyle\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{L}_Xg = \lambda g $$ where $\lambda$ is a constant (i.e. $M$ is a compact Ricci …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
472 views

Index of Modified Dirac Operator

Let's say we have an oriented compact 4-d Riemannian spin manifold $(M,g)$. Everybody who's anybody has heard about the index of the Dirac operator $D: S^+\rightarrow S-$; it's the $\hat{A}$-genus, wh …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
507 views

What does positivity of the first Pontryagin number of a vector bundle tell us?

Some context: In the theory of compact, oriented Riemannian Einstein 4-manifolds, there is a a fundamental topological constraint that is implied by the Einstein equations. To wit, if $\chi$ and $\t …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
376 views

Parallel Transport on Hypersurface Spinor Bundle

So this has been driving me up a wall. I'm trying to digest parts of the Parker & Taubes paper, "On Witten's Proof of the Positive Energy Theorem." Here's a link: https://projecteuclid.org/download/p …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
1 vote

Parallel Transport on Hypersurface Spinor Bundle

I now believe that the statement in question (from the paper), "... the Riemannian connection $\bar\nabla$ of $M$... is compatible with $<\,,\,>$ but not with $(\,,\,)$" is false. It seems that both p …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
188 views

k-th Pontryagin class of $\Lambda^{2k}_{\pm}$ on an oriented $4k$-manifold

If $M^{4k}$ is an oriented Riemannian $4k$-manifold, then the star-operator splits the bundle $\Lambda^{2k}$ into $\pm 1$-eigenspace bundles denoted $\Lambda^{2k}_{\pm}$. I'm curious if anyone has e …
Brian Klatt's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
325 views

Converse to Lichnerowicz Vanishing Theorem?

The Lichnerowicz vanishing theorem says that if on a compact 4-dimensional spin manifold there exists a metric whose scalar curvature $R>0$, then there are no harmonic spinors; $$D\psi=0 \implies \psi …
Brian Klatt's user avatar