Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Homotopy theory, homological algebra, algebraic treatments of manifolds.
12
votes
2
answers
773
views
Where does the term "torsor" come from?
Is there a heuristic reason why principal homogeneous spaces of a group (object) $G$ (in some categories) are called $G$-torsors? Does it have anything to do with the idea of "torsion", somehow? When …
4
votes
Why torsion is important in (co)homology ?
Not that I understand anything of this, but there is the following paper by Peter Scholze that seems to be in-topic here:
On torsion in the cohomology of locally symmetric varieties, Annals of Mathem …
80
votes
15
answers
15k
views
Why torsion is important in (co)homology ?
I've once been told that "torsion in homology and cohomology is regarded by topologists as a very deep and important phenomenon". I presume an analogous statement could be said in the context of algeb …
20
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Why do gerbes live in H^2?
Line bundles on a scheme $X$ live in $H^1(X,O_X^*)$, where $O_{X}^{*}$ is the sheaf of invertible functions. If $X$ is noetherian separated, then we can think of this $H^1$ to be Čech cohmology w.r.t …
0
votes
0
answers
178
views
Topological vs algebraic intersection forms
Let $X$ be a simply connected complex projective surface (hence a real $4$-manifold). Let $(H^2(X,\mathbb Z)/\mathrm{tors}, q_X)$, $(A^1(X)/\mathrm{tors},q_X')$ be the corresponding lattices in cohomo …
0
votes
Two homeomorphic non-diffeomorphic complex manifolds
Google tells me that there are these Horikawa surfaces (I don't know what they are) which posses infinitely many differentiable structures. The fact that the author says the Horikawa surface makes me …
5
votes
2
answers
3k
views
How to prove that $w_1(E)=w_1(\det E)$?
How to prove that the first Stiefel-Whitney class $w_1 (E)$ of a real rank $n$ vector bundle over a manifold M is equal to $w_1(\det E)$, where $\det E$ is the $n$-th wedge power of $E$?
(I want to a …
10
votes
If $X$ and $Y$ are homotopy equivalent, then are $X \times \mathbb{R}^{\infty}$ and $Y \time...
This (Brown--Cohen, A proof that simple-homotopy equivalent polyhedra are stably homeomorphic) gives a partial answer (maybe subsumed by the answer by Igor Rivin).
3
votes
Phenomena of gerbes
If $\mathscr{M}$ is the moduli stack of mathematical objects $X$ of some specified kind such that $\mathrm{Aut}(X)$ always (naturally) contains a group (object) $G\subseteq\mathrm{Aut}(X)$, then $\mat …
21
votes
2
answers
858
views
Do Betti numbers beyond the first have a "number of cuts" interpretation?
I have heard stated the following
Theorem. If $\Sigma$ is a (orientable) surface, then $\mathrm b_1(\Sigma)$ counts the maximum number of "circular cuts" (embedded circles $C_1,\ldots,C_m$) that you …
3
votes
Phenomena of gerbes
The root gerbes $${^r}\sqrt{\mathscr{L}/X}$$ associated to a line bundle on a scheme (or stack) $X$
10
votes
1
answer
775
views
Betti numbers as characteristic numbers?
Let $X$ be a compact differentiable manifold of dimension $m$ or, if you prefer, a smooth complex projective manifold of complex dimension $n=m/2$.
The Euler characteristic $\chi(X):=\Sigma_{i=0}^{m …
6
votes
Occurrences of (co)homology in other disciplines and/or nature
In (real world, for $n=3$) crystallography, given a point group $K\subseteq\mathrm{O}(n)$ and a ($K$-invariant) lattice $T\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$,
the set of possible crystallographic classes (where, …
9
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Relation between $BG$ in topology and in algebraic geometry
This could as well have been asked in the comments to this question, but I prefer to open a new one for the sake of clarity.
Say $G$ is a reductive group over the complex numbers, with compact real f …
9
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Are there 'cohomology' functors that respect all Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms except homotopy i...
What goes wrong in the axiomatic definition of a generalized (co)homology theory if one drops the axiom of homotopy invariance i.e. that homotopic maps should induce the same map in (co)homology?
Or …