Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 4231

(Co)chain complexes, abelian Categories, (pre)sheaves, (co)homology in various (possibly highly generalized) settings, spectra, derived functors, resolutions, spectral sequences, homotopy categories. Chain complexes in an abelian category form the heart of homological algebra.

3 votes

The cohomology group $H^{1}(GL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p}), M_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p}))$

There are really two questions here: (1) What is the dimension of this cohomology? (2) How do I compute it? Though it may not be strictly necessary, it's probably best to treat the cases $p=2$ and …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

Can the Jacobi-Trudi identity be understood as a BGG resolution?

Look at the short paper MR902299 (89a:17012) 17B10 (20C30) Zelevinski˘ı, A.V. [Zelevinsky, Andrei] (2-AOS-CY), Resolutions, dual pairs and character formulas. (Russian) Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
7 votes

Confusion about Subcategories of Category $\mathcal{O}$

EDIT: To compensate for my attempted answer, which mainly added further confusion, I'll substitute the following remarks. Note especially that on the algebraic side the confusion starts in the wordin …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
828 views

Is there a "correct" general setting for the principle: "tensoring any object with a projec...

Apparently this principle was first formulated for left modules over the group algebra $A=kG$ of a finite group, where $k$ is a field of characteristic $p>0$ dividing $|G|$. (See Exercise 2 on p. 426 …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
7 votes

Whitehead lemmas in Lie algebra cohomology for non-algebraically closed fields

There is no problem about the Whitehead lemmas over an arbitrary field of characteristic 0 in the context of (1) complete reducibility of finite dimensional representations of a semisimple Lie algebr …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Complexity of rational $\mathrm{GL}_{n(r)}$-modules

I don't recall seeing an explicit answer to your question in the literature, but the basic outline starts with the (restricted) Lie algebra or first Frobenius kernel: here an upper bound on the comple …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Coinduced modules in the BGG category $\mathcal O$ over complex semisimple Lie algebras

This line of questioning has been pursued in greater generality. starting in prime characteristic by Ron Irving (and myself) and then in the analogous setting of category $\mathcal{O}$ for a semisimpl …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
13 votes
4 answers
3k views

What is a "block" in an abelian category?

In the literature and in some posts here, there has been variation in the undefined use of the term "block" for a category of modules over a ring, or more abstractly an abelian category (all of which …
Jim Humphreys's user avatar