Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with absolute-galois-group
Search options not deleted
user 35575
11
votes
Accepted
Maximal extension almost everywhere unramified and totally split at one place
Nope.
I'm lacking a reference in front of me at the moment (see NSW's Cohomology of Number Fields, or Gras's Class Field Theory -- I'll update with a precise reference later), but there are remarka …
- 8,467
7
votes
On what kind of objects do the Galois groups act?
This is not exactly an incarnation of the question you asked, in the sense that is not so much an action of a Galois group but rather an action whose existence is governed by a Galois group of number- …
- 8,467