Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 33505

first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.

19 votes
Accepted

Can you do math without knowing how to count?

A "philosophy of math" tag would have been a good idea. To answer your question, take a look at Hatry Field's "Science without Numbers". Also, Edward Nelson has developed a theory of "proto-integers" …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
16 votes
Accepted

Reverse mathematics of Cousin's lemma

Sam Sanders here, one of the authors of the paper you mention. Thanks for the nice words. I will answer your questions based on my personal opinion. You write: [...] would like to know if it ha …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
13 votes
Accepted

Can nonstandard analysis be used to prove results in constructive or computable analysis?

Nonstandard Analysis (NSA) can be used to prove results in computable/constructive analysis; The central notion is $\Omega$-invariance, defined as follows. [As usual, the set $N$ consists of the st …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
10 votes

Set-theoretical reverse mathematics of the reals

TL;DR: A most basic property of $\mathbb{R}$ is that it is not countable, which is surprisingly hard to prove (namely far beyond the Big Five you mention), as explored in [1, 2, 3]. The longer version …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
10 votes

Uniqueness results that follow from CH

Assuming $\textsf{CH}$, a lot of natural fourth-order functionals are computationally equivalent (Kleene's S1-S9) to $\exists^3$. These equivalences do not seem to go through without the former. ([ …
9 votes

Simpler proofs using the axiom of choice

Many examples from set theory are known, but here is a very basic (third-order) theorem from most ordinary mathematics: "A regulated$f:[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is bounded", (&) where 'regulated' m …
9 votes

What can be preserved in mathematics if all constructions are carried out in ZF?

ZF cannot prove the local equivalence between "epsilon delta" continuity and "sequential" continuity for functions on the reals. A small fragment of (countable) AC does suffice for proving the equiva …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
9 votes

Church–Turing thesis for higher order functions

Dag Normann (and myself) have written in many places that: there is no Church-Turing thesis for computability of (even just) type 2 objects. As noted here by others, John Longley has explored this the …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
9 votes

Interview of Connes, Caramello, and L. Lafforgue about topos theory

My answer to this question would be: perhaps the religious zeal of some of its followers, based on the following experience. About 12 years ago, the John Templeton Foundation organised a nice meeting …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
9 votes
Accepted

Is there a constructive version of internal set theory?

As you have proven (by a well-known construction), one cannot expect to have full Transfer in constructive NSA. For different but related reasons, full Standardisation is off the table, though its re …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
8 votes

Is there a semantics for intuitionistic logic that is meta-theoretically "self-hosting"?

Comment environment was acting funny, so I am writing an "answer". Here is a good place to start: Harry de Swart's PhD from the University of Nijmegen (the Netherlands) was about this kind of topic: …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
8 votes

How much of mathematical General Relativity depends on the Axiom of Choice?

My (attempt at an) answer goes in the direction of "2. natural restrictions". First of all, as noted in the comments, provable in ZF are restrictions of AC to the language of second-order arithmetic. …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
8 votes

Lists as a foundation of mathematics

The original question was: Can we use lists as the primary notion and build mathematics around it? My answer is that any such approach runs into trouble very quickly, as can be gleaned from the follow …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
8 votes

Did Edward Nelson accept the incompleteness theorems?

Your second question has been properly answered by Emil Jerabek, I would say. Reading some of the comments, I feel I should write the following about your first question: From talking to Ed Nelson an …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359
7 votes

Is there a completeness proof of intuitionistic predicate calculus using Heyting algebra sem...

Harry de Swart's PhD from the University of Nijmegen (the Netherlands) was (explicitly) about this kind of topic. He establishes the completeness of IPC using search trees, in an intuitionistic meta …
Sam Sanders's user avatar
  • 4,359

15 30 50 per page