Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions on modules over rings.
20
votes
Accepted
Classification of subgroups of finitely generated abelian groups
The answer to Question 1 is no.
Let $A=\mathbb{Z}/8\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$
and let $B$ be the subgroup generated by $(2,1)$.
Since $B$ is cyclic of order $4$, if it were contained in a …
17
votes
Accepted
Tilting Objects in BGG Categories $\mathcal{O}$
$ that you describe in the first paragraph of your question, and that, in the case where the highest weight category is the module category of a finite dimensional algebra, that the direct sum of the modules … The algebraic groups/Lie algebras people were apparently not paying enough attention, and started referring to the $D(\lambda)$ as “the tilting modules”, which is wrong on possibly as many as three counts …
15
votes
Accepted
Why do we want $p$-permutation modules in splendid equivalences?
The main reason that it's important that the terms of $X$ are $p$-permutation modules is that, although it's possible to define the Brauer construction for general modules, it behaves much better for $ … The fact that $p$-permutation modules over $k$ lift to ($p$-permutation) modules over $\mathcal{O}G$, which is not true for modules in general, is needed to prove that a splendid equivalence lifts to characteristic …
14
votes
"Sums-compact" objects = f.g. objects in categories of modules?
If it's considered bad form to resurrect year-old threads, then please slap my wrist (gently, please; I'm new here!)
A fairly simple explicit example of a "sumpact" module that is not f.g. is as foll …
12
votes
A question with simple and indecomposable modules
It's not true.
Consider representations of the quiver
$$\bullet\stackrel{\alpha}{\rightarrow}\bullet\stackrel{\beta}{\leftarrow}\bullet.$$
The representation
$k \to k^2
\leftarrow k$, where the arr …
12
votes
Accepted
Inverse of the Structure Theorem for Finitely Generated Modules over PID
From Googling, not personal knowledge:
In Theorem 14 of
Kaplansky, Irving, Modules over Dedekind rings and valuation rings, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 72, 327-340 (1952). … And there's a whole Springer Lecture Notes volume by Brandal on the not-necessarily-domain case:
Brandal, Willy, Commutative rings whose finitely generated modules decompose, Lecture Notes in Mathematics …
11
votes
Accepted
Must the inclusion of an indecomposable module in the direct sum of two copies always split?
Yes, it must be split.
Since $M$ is an indecomposable module for an Artin algebra, its endomorphism ring $E$ is a local ring with nilpotent Jacobson radical $J(E)$. Say $J(E)^n=0$.
Let the monomorphis …
9
votes
The projective covers of Artinian module
Take $R=\mathbb{Z}_p$, the $p$-adic integers, and $A=\mathbb{Q}_p/\mathbb{Z}_p$. Then $A$ is an Artinian $R$-module, but doesn't have a projective cover.
[Since $R$ is local, projectives are free. I …
8
votes
Direct sum of injective modules is injective
Here's an example of a full exact embedding of the module category of a non-Noetherian ring $S$ into that of a Noetherian ring $R$, preserving all direct sums and direct products. So this gives an exa …
8
votes
Accepted
Rank versus free-rank of a module
The functor $F=\operatorname{Hom}(A,-)$ is an equivalence from the category of finite direct sums of copies of $A$ to the category of finitely generated free $E$-modules. …
8
votes
Accepted
Adjoints of scalar extension and scalar coextension
This is an isomorphism of $S$-modules, since for $x,s\in S$ and $m\in M$, $m\otimes xs\mapsto[\varphi\mapsto m\varphi(xs)$. Thus $h^*$ has left adjoint $N\mapsto N\otimes_S\text{Hom}_R(S,R)$. … Again, this is an isomorphism of $S$-modules, since for $m\in M$, $\vartheta\in\text{Hom}_R(S,R)$ and $x,s\in S$, $(\vartheta s)(x)=\vartheta(sx)$, so the isomorphism (in the reverse direction) maps $ …
8
votes
Accepted
indecomposable module over a local ring
If $M$ is allowed to be infinitely generated, then there are counterexamples even for finite dimensional local algebras.
Let $R=\mathbb{C}[x,y]/(x,y)^2$, a three-dimensional local $\mathbb{C}$-algebr …
7
votes
Accepted
Given a representation-infinite algebra, when is every AR component infinite?
If $A$ is connected and has infinite representation type, then every component of its Auslander-Reiten quiver is infinite. See, for example, Theorem 5.4 in Assem, Simson and Skowronski’s Elements of t …
6
votes
the relation between projective and quasi-projective modules
Every simple module is trivially quasi-projective, and if every simple $R$-module is projective then $R$ is semisimple. So semisimple rings are the only rings for which quasi-projective implies projec …
6
votes
Two abelian groups, each being direct factor of the other
Arturo Magidin's answer is absolutely correct, but there's an earlier counterexample than Corner's.
This question is Kaplansky's first "test problem" in his 1954 book on Infinite Abelian Groups, and …