Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options questions only not deleted user 1946

first-order and higher-order logic, model theory, set theory, proof theory, computability theory, formal languages, definability, interplay of syntax and semantics, constructive logic, intuitionism, philosophical logic, modal logic, completeness, Gödel incompleteness, decidability, undecidability, theories of truth, truth revision, consistency.

17 votes
2 answers
2k views

Do the surreal numbers enjoy the transfer principle in ZFC?

The surreal field $\newcommand\No{№}\No$ is definable in ZFC, and it is easy to see that the surreal order is $\kappa$-saturated for every cardinal $\kappa$, precisely because we fill any specified ga …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
11 votes
2 answers
1k views

An infinite hat puzzle variation—if we don't know our place, can we still be almost all corr...

An evil demon is holding uncountably many set theorists captive. He explains to us how he will presently arrange us into a well ordered sequence, with everyone facing the same direction upward in the …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
978 views

If every definable class admits a group structure, must global choice hold?

It is a remarkable fact, due to Hajnal and Kertész and explained very well in this MathOverflow answer by user Ashutosh, that the axiom of choice is equivalent to the assertion that every nonempty set …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
15 votes
2 answers
871 views

Which are the hereditarily computably enumerable sets?

My question is about sets that are computably enumerable with respect to their hereditary membership structure. Specifically, let me define that a hereditarily computably enumerable (h.c.e.) set is on …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
490 views

Normal form for terms in language with two ring structures

Suppose I have two different ring structures on the same domain $\langle R,+,\cdot,0,1\rangle$, $\langle R,\oplus,\otimes,\bar 0,\bar 1\rangle$ and I throw the structures together into a single common …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
34 votes
2 answers
2k views

What is the logical status of the sentence combining the ideas of Löb and Rosser, "this sent...

Logicians are familiar with the variety of self-referential sentences expressible in the language of arithmetic: The Gödel sentence, "this sentence is not provable", which indeed is not provable in w …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
19 votes
2 answers
1k views

Is the theory of a partial order bi-interpretable with the theory of a pre-order?

A partial order relation $\leq$ on a set $A$ is a binary relation that is reflexive, transitive, and antisymmetric. A preorder relation $\unlhd$ (also sometimes known as a quasi order or pseudo order) …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
12 votes
3 answers
881 views

Is there a simple instance of intransitivity for implicit definability?

This question continues the theme of some recent questions on implicit definability. A relation $R$ is implicitly definable in a first-order structure $M$ if there is a property $\varphi(\dot R)$, exp …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
44 votes
2 answers
4k views

Is multiplication implicitly definable from successor?

A relation $R$ is implicitly definable in a structure $M$ if there is a formula $\varphi(\dot R)$ in the first-order language of $M$ expanded to include relation $R$, such that $M\models\varphi(\dot R …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
33 votes
2 answers
3k views

Can we interpret arithmetic in set theory, with exactly PA as the ZFC provable consequences?

There are many interpretations of arithmetic in set theory. The Zermelo interpretation, for example, begins with the empty set and applies the singleton operator as successor: $$0=\{\ \}$$ $$1=\{0\}$$ …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
39 votes
3 answers
3k views

Can one show that the real field is not interpretable in the complex field without the axiom...

We all know that the complex field structure $\langle\mathbb{C},+,\cdot,0,1\rangle$ is interpretable in the real field $\langle\mathbb{R},+,\cdot,0,1\rangle$, by encoding $a+bi$ with the real-number p …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
703 views

Can we separate the almost-disjointness sunflower numbers?

This question concerns a new cardinal characteristic of the continuum that arose out of issues in my answer to the question, Sunflowers in maximal almost disjoint families. A family $\cal A$ of infini …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
771 views

Does every countable set of Turing degrees have an upper bound, without AC?

It is easy to see that every countable collection of sets $A_n\subseteq\mathbb{N}$ has an upper bound in the Turing degrees, since we can just take a copy of their disjoint sum $\oplus_n A_n=\{\langle …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
16 votes
2 answers
1k views

Are the vertical sections of the Ackermann function primitive recursive?

The Ackermann function $A(m,n)$ is a binary function on the natural numbers defined by a certain double recursion, famous for exhibiting extremely fast-growing behavior. One finds various slightly dif …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
80 votes
4 answers
9k views

Who first characterized the real numbers as the unique complete ordered field?

Nearly every mathematician nowadays is familiar with the fact that there is up to isomorphism only one complete ordered field, the real numbers. Theorem. Any two complete ordered fields are isomorphic …
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
15 30 50 per page