All Questions
15 questions
2
votes
0
answers
92
views
Existence of ergodic subgroup invariant to a product measure
Let $X=\{0, 1\}^{\mathbb{N}}$ and $G$ be the group of permutations, each of which only permutes finitely many coordinates of $X$. Fix a sequence $(\lambda_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}} \subseteq (0, 1]$ and ...
- 307
4
votes
1
answer
446
views
Birkhoff ergodic theorem for ergodic Markov processes
This question was previously posted on MSE.
This question might be easy but I am really stuck on it.
Let $M$ be compact metric space and $\mathcal B(M)$ the Borel $\sigma$-algebra of M. Consider the ...
CommunityBot
- 1
0
votes
0
answers
107
views
How to show that the map $ R $ here is measure-preserving
Assume that $ (X,\mathcal{B},m,T) $ is a measure-preserving dynamical system, where $ (X,\mathcal{B},m) $ is a probability space, $ \mathcal{B} $ denotes all the measurable sets in $ X $, $ m $ is the ...
- 575
25
votes
6
answers
6k
views
Proof of Krylov-Bogoliubov theorem
Where can I find a proof (in English) of the Krylov-Bogoliubov theorem, which states if $X$ is a compact metric space and $T\colon X \to X$ is continuous, then there is a $T$-invariant Borel ...
- 4,713
1
vote
0
answers
177
views
Building random homeomorphisms of the torus $\mathbb T^2$
In https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3423, a family of random homeomorphisms of the circle is constructed. Main Question: Can the construction be generalized to higher space dimensions, e.g. to $\mathbb T^2$?...
- 101
0
votes
0
answers
118
views
A measure on the group of homeomorphisms of $\mathbb T^2$
Let us consider the group of measure-preserving homeomorphisms of $\mathbb T^2$ (with transformations identified if they agree almost
everywhere) called $G[\mathbb T^2, \mathcal L^2]$. We shall ...
- 101
1
vote
0
answers
96
views
Building random homeomorphisms of the circle
Given a positive Borel measure without atoms $\tau$ on the circle $\mathbb T =\mathbb R /\mathbb Z =[0,1)$ , in https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3423 a homeomorphism $h:[0,1)\to [0,1)$ is defined as
\...
- 101
7
votes
1
answer
253
views
Are all quasi-regular points on Polish spaces generic points?
Let $X$ be a Polish space and $T\colon X\to X$ be a continuous map. We say that a point $x\in X$ is quasi-regular if for every bounded continous function $\varphi\colon X\to\mathbb{R}$ the sequence $...
- 1,074
3
votes
1
answer
233
views
A subadditive maximal ergodic theorem
Let $(\Omega,\mathcal A,\operatorname P)$ be a probability space, $\tau:\Omega\to\Omega$ be a measurable map on $(\Omega,\mathcal A)$ with $\operatorname P\circ\:\tau^{-1}=\operatorname P$, $Y_n:\...
- 2,090
3
votes
1
answer
372
views
Attractors in random dynamics
Let $\Delta$ be the interval $[-1,1]$, then we can consider the probability space $(\Delta , \mathcal{B}(\Delta),\nu)$, where $\mathcal{B}(\Delta)$ is the Borel $\sigma$-algebra and $\nu$ is equal ...
- 63.9k
2
votes
1
answer
119
views
time delay ergodic theorem
given dynamic system $(X, \mathcal{B}, F, \mu), \mu \circ F^{-1}=\mu, F $ is mixing, $ A \in \mathcal{B}, s.t. \mu(A) >0 $.
consider dynamic system $(X\times X, \mathcal{B}\otimes \mathcal{B}, ...
- 23.2k
2
votes
1
answer
200
views
Measurable isomorphism between two non-totally ergodic systems
Suppose $(X,\mathcal A,\mu,T)$ is a finite measure-preserving system. Then we define a new measure system $(X^{(K)},\mathcal A^{(K)},\mu^{(K)},T^{(K)})$ defined by $X^{(K)}=X\times \{1,2,...,K\}$ for ...
- 3,911
2
votes
2
answers
557
views
trivial map on $\sigma-$algebra $\mod{}0$ is trivial
Hi everyone!
I am currently studying the basic theory of measurable actions and need the following result, which I am not able to prove myself. It is stated without a proof, so probably it should not ...
- 41.1k
9
votes
2
answers
586
views
Fixed objects of the M endofunctor on category Meas
Consider the category $\operatorname{Meas}$ of measurable spaces: its objects are sets equipped with $\sigma$-algebras, and its morphisms are measurable functions between spaces.
As Gerald Edgar &...
CommunityBot
- 1
2
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Given a probability \mu, can we always find a transformation T s.t. \mu is T-invariant?
It is true that, under some conditions, given a measure-preserving transformation $T$, we can always construct a $T$-invariant probability. I am wondering whether we can do a converse. See Parry's ...
- 31.5k