Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
14 votes
0 answers
574 views

Reference for a proof of the fiberwise Stokes theorem

The fiberwise Stokes theorem says that given a differential form on a smooth fiber bundle whose fibers have boundary, the difference between the fiberwise integral of the differential and the ...
Dmitri Pavlov's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
291 views

Strange problem about triplets of differential forms

Suppose we have the following map: $$(\Omega^1(\mathbb{R}^n))^3\longrightarrow(\Omega^2(\mathbb{R}^n))^3$$ $$(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)\longmapsto(\mathrm{d}\alpha+\beta\wedge\gamma,\mathrm{d}\beta+\...
Jjm's user avatar
  • 2,091
6 votes
1 answer
163 views

Restriction of "Spin(7) 4-form" to $\mathbb{R}_+\times S^7$

I asked this question on stackexchange (https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2212226/restriction-of-spin7-4-form-to-mathbbr-times-s7) but was advised to ask again here: I'm currently reading ...
Martin van Beek's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
82 views

Interpolating from a Hard Lefschetz class to a Kaehler class

Let $X$ be a compact smooth manifold that admits symplectic and Kaehler structures. There is a paper by Ugarte, Rudyak, Tralle, and Ibanez, showing how the Lefschetz rank can vary along a path of ...
Sinister Cutlass's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
137 views

Heat-Flow on continuous differential forms and the Feller peroperty

Let (M,g) be a complete Riemannian manifold. It is well known that the Laplace operator is essentially self-adjoint on $C^\infty_c(M)$. This extends to the (de Rahm) Laplace operator on forms. Thus in ...
Nathanael Schilling's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
675 views

$\infty$-forms and $\infty$-plectic geometry

Can you have $\infty$-forms on infinite-dimensional manifolds or elsewhere and what are they used for?
user17731's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
239 views

Can every De Rham cohomology class be represented by a closed form $\alpha$ with $L_X \alpha=0$

Assume that $M$ is a manifold and $X$ is a vector field on $M$. Is it true to say that every closed form is De Rham-cohomologue to a closed form $\alpha$ with $L_X \alpha =0$?
Ali Taghavi's user avatar