2
$\begingroup$

Let $s_1,s_2: \mathbb{R}^{2\times 2} \mapsto \mathbb{R}_+$, $s_{1}\left(\cdot\right)\ge s_{2}\left(\cdot\right)\ge 0$, be the singular values of a $2\times2$ matrix. Is it true that $$\left|s_{1}\left(M+N\right)-s_{1}\left(N\right)\right|+\left|s_{2}\left(M+N\right)-s_{2}\left(N\right)\right|\leq s_{1}\left(M\right)+s_{2}\left(M\right)$$ for any two $2\times2$ real matrices $M$ and $N$?

Thanks in advance for any helpful answers.

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Here is a more general result.

Let $A$ and $B$ be arbitrary $n \times n$ complex matrices. Then, we have the weak-majorization:

$$ |s(A) - s(B)|\quad \prec_w\quad s(A-B)$$

This result implies your alleged inequality as a special case.

The above result follows from a famous theorem of Lidskii, which states that for Hermitian matrices $A$ and $B$,

$$ \lambda^\downarrow(A) - \lambda^\downarrow(B) \prec \lambda(A-B),$$ where $\lambda^\downarrow(A)$ lists eigenvalues of $A$ is decreasing order (notice that here the majorization is strict)

For more details, see for example, Exercise IV.3.1 in Matrix Analysis by R. Bhatia.

Alternatively, you can have a look (for the singular value majorization result) at Theorem 3.4.5 in Topics in Matrix Analysis by Horn and Johnson.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Watch out, though, for the fact that Bhatia and Horn & Johnson use opposite conventions in the definiton of majorization. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2011 at 13:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Mark: Really? Seems like Def. 3.2.8 in HJ is the same as condition (II.2) in Bhatia's book (considering only weak majorization). $\endgroup$
    – Suvrit
    Commented Oct 6, 2011 at 13:57
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, I was thinking of Matrix Analysis by Horn and Johnson. It looks like they switched conventions between volumes. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2011 at 21:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .