Sorry if this is too easy for MO, but I found it in a research paper, so I thought that it was worth posting here.
I was reading a paper by Rabinowitz(this one to be more precise) and I came across the following theorem:
Theorem 2.10: Suppose $H\in C^1(\mathbb{R}^{2n}, \mathbb{R})$ and satisfies
($H_1$) $H(z)\ge 0$
($H_2$) $H(z)=o(|z|^2)$ at $z=0$
($H_3$) There are constants $r>0$ and $\mu>2$ such that for all $|z|>r$, $$0<\mu H(z)\le (z, H_z(z))_{\mathbb{R}^{2n}}.$$ Then, for any $T>0$, (HS) has a nonconstant $T$ periodic solution.
What I don't understand is one of the remarks after this statement. It says that by integrating the inequality in ($H_3$) we get that there are constants $a_1, a_2>0$ such that $$H(z)\ge a_1 |z|^{\mu}-a_2$$ for all $z\in \mathbb{R}^{2n}$.
I don't understand how we actually integrate that inequality. What I am sure is that for $|z|\le r$ I just have to use the fact that $H$ is continuous on this compact set and I have a lower bound. So, the integration part is, as expected, for $|z|>r$.
I thought that maybe I should just write $z=(z_1, z_2, ..., z_{2n})$ and express the scalar product using its definition, i.e. $\displaystyle (z, H_z(z))_{\mathbb{R}^{2n}}=\sum_{j=1}^{2n} z_j \frac{\partial H}{\partial z_j}(z)$. From what I understand from the paper, $z$ is a function of time ($t$). So, I think that I should just integrate with respect to $t$ on $[r, |z|]$ and apply integration by parts, but I still don't see how this leads to the inequality in the remark.
So, I would really appreciate your help, I am sure that this is just a routine computation (I saw similar inequalities in other papers of Rabinowitz, but he always just says that they are obtained by integrating some inequality), but I haven't done this before.